Intelligence
PSY 111 Intelligence Lecture Outline
Key Topics Covered:
Defining "Intelligence"
IQ Testing & Cultural Validity
Heredity, Intelligence & the Extremes
Approaches to Intelligence
Defining Intelligence
Definition of Intelligence:
An inferred characteristic of an individual.
Generally defined as the ability to:
Profit from experience.
Acquire knowledge.
Think abstractly.
Act purposefully.
Adapt to changes in the environment.
Intelligence(s)
Multiple Definitions of Intelligence:
Expressed in different domains.
Example: The absent-minded professor.
Intelligence is functional and directed at solving problems.
Intelligence is defined and shaped by culture.
Approaches to Intelligence
Psychometric Approach:
Utilizes statistical techniques to define intellectual skills and abilities.
Intelligence Testing
Psychometric Approach in Testing:
Utilizes devised tests to measure a person's cognitive level relative to others in a population.
First popularized by Francis Galton.
Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon devised a test to measure intellectual development in children.
Introduced the “Mental Age” concept:
MA = ext{average age at which children achieve an actual score}
Tests measure memory, vocabulary, and perceptual discrimination.
Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
Definition:
A measure to allow for comparison of test scores among individuals, devised by L. Terman.
IQ formula:
IQ = rac{MA}{CA} imes 100
(where MA = mental age, CA = chronological age)
Applied Intelligence Testing
Wechsler Scales:
WAIS-III (for adults)
WISC-IV (for children aged 6-16)
IQ is calculated relative to norms rather than chronological age.
Indices Evaluated:
Working Memory
Processing Speed
Perceptual Organization
Verbal Comprehension
Frequency Distribution of IQ Scores
IQ scores are distributed “normally.”
Statistics:
68% of people have IQ between 85-115.
99.7% fall between 55-145.
Validity Issues for IQ Tests
Valid Uses of IQ Test Scores:
Predict ability to succeed in school.
Criticisms of IQ Tests:
Minimal theoretical basis; lack of underlying construct or theory during development of tests.
Cultural bias evident in test results:
Scores dependent on language and cultural experiences.
Historical cases: immigrants from Europe labeled as mentally defective due to language barriers mentioned in tests administered in English.
Continues today with minority populations in the US scoring lower than white populations.
Culture and IQ Testing
Can IQ Tests be “Culture Free”?
Attempts to develop culture-free IQ tests have not been successful.
Cultural values and experiences affect:
Attitudes toward exams
Comfort levels during testing
Motivation levels
Rapport with test provider
Overall competitiveness
Ease of independent problem solving
Testing Approaches:
Efforts to eliminate language in tests by using demonstrations and pictures have been made.
Acknowledgment that culture-free tests are unfeasible leads to designing culture-fair tests, which draw on experiences common across cultures.
Expectations, Stereotypes, and IQ Scores
Impact of Stereotypes on Performance:
Expectations shaped by cultural stereotypes affect test scores.
Stereotype Threat:
Definition: The burden of doubt regarding performance induced by negative stereotypes about one’s group.
Significant effects have been observed on various groups:
African-Americans
Latinos
Low-income and elderly individuals
Women
Alaska Natives
Brain Size, Intelligence, and Mental Retardation (MR)
Correlation:
No significant correlation found between brain size and intelligence.
In certain cases, an enlarged brain size could lead to deficits (e.g., Autism: failure of normal cell death in development).
Causes of Intellectual Disability/Mental Retardation
Causes Include:
Genetic Disorders (e.g., Down Syndrome – characterized by an extra 21st chromosome)
Environmental Factors
Damage incurred during birth
Head injuries
Diseases during pregnancy
Most common cause is in-utero exposure to alcohol or drugs.
Nature-Nurture in Intelligence
Influencing Factors on Individual Intelligence:
Environmental Factors:
e.g. parental education, mental status, nutrition
Genetic Factors:
Suggestion that intelligence has heritable components.
Research Strategies:
Twin Studies:
Compare IQ scores in Monozygotic (MZ) and Dizygotic (DZ) twins.
Adoption Studies:
Compare IQ scores of adopted children within their adoptive families versus biological families.
Findings:
Data suggests a strong influence of genetics on individual intelligence.
Emotional Intelligence
Definition:
Emotional intelligence is the ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions.
Considered part of social intelligence.
Characteristics of Emotionally Intelligent People:
Tend to avoid being overwhelmed by emotions.
Perform better in work settings.
Show capability to delay gratification for longer-term rewards.
Often succeed in areas where those who are academically smarter, but emotionally less intelligent, fail.
Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Gardner)
Concept Overview:
Proposes that mental abilities are independent of one another.
Different intelligences are associated with different brain regions.
Focuses on how a person is intelligent rather than the degree of their intelligence.
Key terms
Cultural Bias in IQ Testing
Critiques:
Minimal theoretical basis; lack of underlying construct or theory during tests' development.
Cultural bias evident in test results, particularly regarding language and cultural experiences.
Historical instances where non-native English speakers faced misinterpretation in tests, impacting scores.
Ongoing disparities observed, especially among minority populations in the US.
Emotional Intelligence
Definition:
The ability to perceive, understand, manage, and utilize emotions effectively.
Considered part of social intelligence.
Characteristics of Emotionally Intelligent People:
Tend to avoid being overwhelmed by emotions.
Perform better in work settings and have robust interpersonal skills.
Capability to delay gratification for longer-term rewards.
Often succeed in areas where academically smarter individuals may struggle due to lower emotional intelligence.
Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
Descriptive Characteristics:
A measure devised to compare test scores among individuals, introduced by L. Terman.
Original Formula:
IQ = \frac{MA}{CA} \times 100 (where MA = mental age, CA = chronological age)
Current Indices Evaluated:
Working Memory
Processing Speed
Perceptual Organization
Verbal Comprehension
Intelligence Testing
Origins and History:
First popularized by Francis Galton and later expanded by Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon.
Developed methods to measure cognitive levels relative to the population, focusing on children's intellectual development.
Types of Testing:
Standardized tests such as Wechsler Scales (WAIS-III for adults, WISC-IV for children aged 6-16) focusing on comparative norms.
Multiple Intelligences (Gardner)
Concept Overview:
Proposes that mental abilities are independent of one another; different intelligences correspond to various brain regions.
Emphasizes diverse ways of being intelligent over a standardized measure.
Nature vs Nurture in Intelligence
Influencing Factors:
Environmental Factors include parental education, mental health, and nutrition.
Genetic Factors suggest intelligence has heritable components.
Research Strategies:
Twin Studies: Compare IQ scores in Monozygotic (MZ) versus Dizygotic (DZ) twins.
Adoption Studies: Compare adopted children’s IQ within their adoptive families against biological families.
Psychometric Approach
Overview:
Utilizes statistical techniques to define intellectual skills and abilities, focusing on measurable cognitive functions.
Testing Approaches:
Employs devised tests to measure a person's cognitive level against others. The psychometric approach is essential in understanding intelligence.
Stereotype Threat
Definition:
The burden of doubt regarding performance induced by negative stereotypes about one’s group.
Impact:
Significant effects on various groups have been documented, including African-Americans, Latinos, low-income/elderly individuals, women, and Alaska Natives, highlighting the problem of social expectations and biases in performance evaluations.