Why do we study Psychology?
To appreciate modern psychology
To avoid repetition of mistakes
The importance of rediscovery
What is science?
The ability to directly observe something in nature followed by an explanation of what has been observed
What is rationalism? (LOGIC)
knowledge comes from reason and logic
What is empiricism? (SENSE/EXPERIENCE)
knowledge comes from sensory and experiences
Theories
To organize empirical observations and guide future observation
MUST BE TESTABLE
2 Classes of scientific laws
Correlational law (shows a connection, not a cause)
Casual laws (a cause, has control)
it is rare that a case only has one cause
Karl Popper
Popper disagreed with traditional views of science and instead believed that scientific activity began with a problem which determines what observations are needed. He believed that ALL scientific theories will eventually be proven false and replaced with better theories.
Principles of Falsifiability
Scientific theory must be refutable
(For a theory to be valid according to falsification, it must produce hypotheses that have the potential to be proven incorrect by observable evidence or experimental results.)
Ex: the hypothesis that “all swans are white” can be falsified by observing a black swan
Risky Predications
For a theory to be scientific it must run the risk of being incorrect
Mind & Body
Monism
a view that there is only one kind of ultimate substance
Materialist (matter)
Everything is physics and chemistry: matter is the only reality
Idealist (consciousness)
Even physical reality is a result of perception/ideas
Dualism
Belief that there are both physical and mental events
Interactionism (Mind & Body interact)
mind influences the body and vice versa
Emergentist (Mental state emerge from physical brain state)
One version of this is epiphenomenalism
i. The brain causes mental events, but mental events cannot cause behavior
ii. Mental events are just biproducts of brain processes
Psychophysical Parallelism
Environmental experience causes BOTH mental events and bodily
responses simultaneously but the two are independent of one another
Mind and body do not interact but also cannot be separated
Nativism vs. Empiricism (Nature v. Nurture)
Nativism: Emphasizes role of inheritance
Empiricism: Emphasizes role of experience
Rationalism vs. Irrationalism
Rationalism: Human behavior is guided by logic & intelligence and is thought out and specific
Irrationalism: Human behavior is largely unconscious, and the true causes of behavior cannot always be identified/ explained (emphasizes emotions)
Many see the combination of the two as superior
Origin of human knowledge
Radical Empiricist
All knowledge is derived from sensory experience
Passive mind
Rationalist
Sensory experience is often the first step in attaining knowledge, but
the mind must then actively transform this information in some way before
knowledge is attained
Active mind
Nativists
Some knowledge is innate
Chess example
if two people look at a chess board mid game but one of them is a master and the other doesn’t know how to play at all, are they looking at the same board?
empiricist: yes, because it is the same object
rationalist: no, one sees moves to be made and the other just sees figures that are scattered across a checkered table
Free will vs. Determinism
Free Will - The idea that people have the ability to make their own choices and are not controlled by external factors
Determinism - The idea that all events are caused by previous events, and that people are controlled by external factor
Animism
The belief that inanimate objects have human feelings and intentions
Anthropomorphism
Giving animals human characteristics
Thales (625-547 B.C.)
Seen as the first philosopher
Emphasized natural explanations and minimized supernatural ones
Physis - water
The single substance of the world is water
Developed navigation methods based on stars & planets
Applied geometric principles to measure large things (ex.
buildings)
Anaximander (610-547 B.C.)
Studied with Thales
Proposed a very basic theory of evolution
Physis – the “boundless” or the “indefinite
Argued even water was a compound of smaller material
He believed that the world and all natural phenomena originated from this indefinite substance, rather than from a specific element like water or air
fish theory: earth + water = Fish
Heraclitus (540-480 B.C.)
Physis – fire
Heraclitus identified fire as the primary substance (arche) of the cosmos
Nothing “is”; everything is “becoming”
Famous statement – “it is impossible to step twice into the same river”
Epistemological question: how can something be known if it is constantly changing?
Pythagoras (580-500 B.C.)
Physis – numbers
Math can be used to predict & explain nature
Transmigration of souls
when we die, our souls move on
Progressive for the time
First to talk about mind & body (dualism)
Believed mind to be more important
Empedocles (490 -430 B.C.)
Physis – 4 elements (water, fire, earth, air)
Humans consist of these elements:
Earth = solid part of the body
Water = liquids in the body
Air = breath of life
Fire = ability to reason
Eidola- the first theory of perception (tiny participles going through our pores)
eidola were thin films or images emitted by objects that traveled through the air and entered the eyes, thus enabling vision. According to this theory, these images were composed of tiny particles and retained the form of the object from which they originated.
Hippocrates (Father of medicine)
Balance of 4 humors
Blood: Linked to being cheerful and energetic.
Phlegm: Linked to being calm and dependable.
Yellow Bile: Linked to being ambitious and sometimes angry.
Black Bile: Linked to being thoughtful and sometimes sad.
The idea was that a balance of these fluids meant good health, and an imbalance could lead to illness or changes in personality.
The Hippocratic oath is “to do no harm”
Galen
First theory of personality
4 humors associated with 4 temperaments
more blood = joyful
Socrates (470-399 B.C.)
Know thyself”
Wanted people to question
Wanted people to question/challenge him
Search for knowledge
Always in a position to learn
Socratic questioning: asking questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presumptions. (Why this? Why that?)
Plato (427-347 B.C)
Allegory of the cave
Imagine a group of people who have lived chained inside a dark cave all their lives. They are facing the cave wall and can't see the entrance. Behind them is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway. People outside the cave pass along this walkway, casting shadows on the wall of the cave.
The prisoners watch these shadows and believe them to be the only reality, as they have never seen anything else. One day, a prisoner is freed and exposed to the outside world. At first, the light is blinding, and it takes time for the prisoner to adjust. Slowly, the prisoner realizes that the shadows on the wall were merely reflections of real objects in the outside world.
When the prisoner returns to the cave to tell the others, they don't believe him and prefer the shadows, which are familiar to them.
Reminiscence theory of knowledge: All knowledge is innate and can be attained only through introspection
Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
First philosopher to extensively attend to many topics that later became part of psychology
Technology: everything has a cause
Entelechy: belief that everyone and everything starts out with purpose/function
Cause and purpose come from “unmoved mover” (God?)
a force that causes the change but itself is not changed
Laws of association
law of contiguity
ideas or experiences that occur together in time or space are linked in memory
ex. if you always hear a bell right before dinner, you may start associating the sound of the bell with the feeling of hunger.
law of similarity
similar ideas or experiences are connected in the mind
ex. seeing a picture of a cat may remind you of your own pet cat because they share similar features
law of contrast
opposite ideas or experiences are associated with each other
ex. thinking about a cold winter day might make you think of a hot summer day due to their contrasting characteristics.
law of frequency
the more often two ideas are paired, the stronger the association becomes
ex. hearing a song repeatedly, specific memories come up
Renaissance
4 themes
Individualism: People began to focus on personal achievements and self-expression
Personal Religion: People sought to understand their faith individually rather than relying solely on the Church.
Interest in the past: They studied ancient texts, art, and architecture, which influenced their own work.
Anti Aristotle: People began to emphasize individual potential and achievements, which sometimes clashed with Aristotle's more rigid views on society and human nature // The period also saw a movement towards personal religion and a questioning of the authority of the Church. This broader trend of questioning established authority extended to Aristotle's ideas as well.
Martin Luther
views on Catholicism
disgusted” by Christianity at the time, especially opposed to Catholicism
Luther believed that the Pope had too much power over the Church and politics. He argued that the Bible, not the Pope, should be the ultimate authority on religious matters
Didn’t want people to abandon the church, just started a new sect of
Christianity
Protestant: The term "Protestant" originally referred to those who "protested" against certain practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church.
Denial of Free Will
Everything is in God’s plan
Geocentric Theory
the belief that the Earth is the center of the universe
Heliocentric Theory
the belief that the Sun is the center of the universe
Copernicus (1473-1543)
• First to challenge theory that Earth is the center of the universe
• Said sun was center and backed this with math (heliocentric)
Galileo
he made a telescope (1609)
why wouldn’t people look?
it went against the beliefs of the church
Why was he hated by the church?
God did not intend for humans to have this type of vision. Otherwise, humans would’ve been able be see it with the naked eye.
When was he cleared by the church? 1992
Newton
law of gravitation
Deism: God created the universe and then “let it be” and does not actively intervene in the events of the world
Bacon
No theories, only observations
If you start with a theory, you start with a bias
4 Sources of error (experimenter bias)
idol of the cave
These errors come from personal experiences and education. Each person's unique upbringing and cultural background can distort their perception of reality
idol of the tribe
These are errors that arise from human nature itself. People tend to see patterns and order even where none exist, and they project human characteristics onto the natural world
idol of the marketplace
These are errors that arise from the use of language and communication. Misunderstandings and imprecise use of words can lead to confusion and false beliefs.
idol of the theater
These are errors that come from adherence to philosophical dogmas and theories. People often accept these ideas uncritically, much like an audience passively watching a play.
Descartes
only thing for certain: he was doubting
“I think, therefor I am”
invented analytic geometry because of a fly
Some ideas are innate and put in by nature/God
• Ex: unity, infinity, perfection, geometry, and God
Since God would not deceive us, we can trust our senses
• But we need to analyze sensory information rationally
Mechanistic view of human & animal behavior
• Nerves – hollow tubes -> cavities in the brain -> animal spirits
• Reflex
Mind/Body Interaction (dualist)
• Only humans possessed a mind that was conscious and allowed for freedom of choice and rationality
• Mind can influence the body
• Mind exerts influence in the brain
• Psychology = Science
Hobbes
politics- monarchy
Humans can be viewed as machines & understood through geometry
Physical monist
Only the body is important
Hedonist
Motivated by our appetites
Determinist
Choice is just a verbal label
Locke
One of the most influential political philosophers
Government: By the people, for the people
Dualist
Rejected Hobbes’s physical monism
Opposed innate ideas
Tabula Rasa (blank slate)
Ideas come from experience (nurture)
simple ideas- basic sensory experiences from direct interaction with the external world
complex ideas- combing simple ideas through processes like association, memory, and imagination
Mind can neither create nor destroy ideas
Berkeley
External reality: only our perceptions
If a tree falls...
o with experience we can accurately perceive
o Distance perception
o Milestone: How complex perception is
to be is to be perceived
Bain
first psychologist
founded “mind”, first psychological journal
mind 3 components: feelings, will, and intellect
Voluntary behavior- self-initiated actions guided by past experiences
Reflexive: involuntary automatic response to stimuli
ex. Pulling your hand away from a hot stove.
Spontaneous: involuntary automatic behavior that occurs without a direct stimulus and can lead to learning
ex. a baby might randomly make a sound (spontaneous behavior) and then learn to repeat it because it gets attention from parents.
Precursor to operant conditioning
Von Leibniz
law of continuity- no native gaps in nature
Petite Perceptions- tiny, unconscious, sensory experiences that accumulate to form, conscious awareness but one individual too small to be noticed.
(These are subtle, often unnoticed impressions or feelings that can influence our thoughts and behaviors without us being fully aware of them.)
Apperception- becoming consciously aware of accumulated petite perception leading to higher thought and self-awareness
Faculty Psychology
theory that the mind is made up of different mental faculties (think of phrenology) (the touching head thing)
Kant
was a faculty psychologist
categorical imperative
Always treat others as ends in themselves
• Each individual is free to act on it or not
• Against it – guilt
• Free will
Psych could not become an experimental science b/c
The mind cannot be objectively studied
Herbart
Psychic mechanics- ideas contain a force of their own
Apperceptive Mass
A perception- tiny ideas helps you become conscious
Compatible ideas that form a group in consciousness
Prevent incompatible ideas from entering
Repression: force used to keep incompatible ideas in unconscious
Enough incompatible ideas – form a group
Become another apperceptive mass in consciousness