Week 2 -- Chp 5 -- p. 78-83 -- Latin America in Colonial Times -- Matthew Restall, Kris Lane -- Second edition, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2018 -- Cambridge University Press

Part Two: The Long Conquest

Tlaxcala and Its Resilience

  • Tlaxcala was never conquered by the Mexica (Aztecs) but remained vigilant against their aggression.

  • Inhabitants lived under constant fear of being subject to the Mexica's tributary system.

  • Resentment towards Aztec aggression eventually contributed to the Spanish invasion's success.

Other States Resisting Mexica Domination

  • Besides Tlaxcala, other kingdoms like the Tarascan kingdom also resisted Mexica control.

  • Tarascan capital: Tzintzuntzan.

  • These states demonstrate that the Mexica Empire was not invincible despite its expansion.

Rise of Aztec Power

  • The Aztecs’ dominance in highland Mexico grew through the efforts of five emperors following Itzcoatl.

  • Moctezuma Ilhuicamina (1440) succeeded his uncle Itzcoatl. Important successors included:

    • Axayåcatl

    • Tizoc

    • Ahuitzotl

  • Ahuitzotl's coronation (1486) showcased the vast extent of Mexica power and influence, instilling terror in visiting rulers.

Last Independent Aztec Emperor

  • Moctezuma Xocoyotl consolidated Aztec power from 1502 until his murder in 1520 by Spanish forces.

  • His leadership included numerous victories but later was criticized for the empire's response to Spanish threats.

  • He became a symbol of ineptitude regarding the empire's collapse following the Spanish arrival in 1519.

Inca Empire's Parallel Developments

  • In 1438, Cusi Yupanqui, later known as Pachacuti, became the first true Inca emperor after overthrowing his father.

  • Established a mythological history that justified Inca expansion as a civilizing mission over the Andean people.

  • Unlike the Aztecs, the Incas did not have knowledge of each other’s existence during their rise.

Size and Structure of the Empires

  • The Inca Empire covered approximately 2,600 miles, from Ecuador to Chile, much larger than the Aztec Empire at its peak.

  • Tawantinsuyu: The Inca name for their empire, meaning "Union of the Four Quarters".

  • While the Aztecs relied on market systems and regional traders, the Incas exercised centralized control over trade.

Inca Administration and Labor Systems

  • Mit'a system: Mandated labor in lieu of tribute gathered from subject populations.

  • This labor included agricultural work on state-owned lands and service in the Inca military.

  • The Inca road system (14,000 miles long) facilitated communication and transport across the empire, critical for governance and military operations.

  • Seasonal migration was common, promoting Inca administration across various territories.

Administrative Practices and Quipu

  • Incas used quipu (knotted cords) as a primary method for recording information, contrary to the diverse writing systems of other Mesoamerican cultures.

  • The centralized trade system facilitated effective imperial governance, allowing for redistributive economics and suppressing free market activities.

The Impact of European Diseases

  • Epidemics such as smallpox struck the Inca Empire around 1525, significantly impacting its population and governance before Spanish entry.

  • The death of Huayna Capac (possibly from smallpox) led to a succession crisis between two heirs, causing internal strife and weakening the Inca Empire.

Spanish Conquest of the Incas

  • The internal division and disease facilitated the conquest led by Francisco Pizarro in 1532.

The Maya Encounter with Cortés

  • In 1525, Hernando Cortés and his expedition encountered the Chontal Maya and Itzá Maya kingdoms offering hospitality.

  • Acalan and Noh Petén were capital cities with modest territorial claims.

  • Both kingdoms had populations around 30,000, showcasing sedentary life and cultural continuity despite being smaller compared to historic giants like Tikal.

  • The Maya were part of a thriving network of Mesoamerican civilization, retaining their complete writing system and cultural practices at the time of Spanish encounters.

Conclusion

  • The complexities of both the Inca and Aztec empires underscore diverse responses to external pressures and internal dynamics, shaping their legacies in the face of European conquest.