CHEM211-Ch.18
Organic Chemistry Principles and Mechanisms
Chapter 18: Nucleophilic Addition to Polar π Bonds
General Mechanism: Addition of Strong Nucleophiles
A nucleophile tends to form a bond with the atom at the positive end of a polar π bond.
Definition: A nucleophile is a species that donates an electron pair to form a chemical bond.
Characteristics:
Electron-rich nature: Nucleophiles possess a lot of electrons.
Electron-poor target: The atom at the positive end of a polar π bond is electron deficient.
The addition under basic conditions differs from low pH conditions.
General Mechanism Continued: Addition of Strong Nucleophiles
To avoid exceeding the octet for the atom attacked by the nucleophile, the π bond is broken.
The electrons from the π bond become a lone pair on the more electronegative atom of the π bond.
Compounds with Polar p Bonds
In compounds where the C atom of the polar π bond has a leaving group, the leaving group facilitates nucleophilic addition–elimination reactions.
Certain leaving groups are more effective than others based on their leaving group ability:
Factors include:
Stability of the leaving group after departure.
Resonance effects or inductive stabilization can enhance leaving group ability.
Relative Reactivity of Ketones and Aldehydes
Ketones and aldehydes exhibit similar behaviors due to structural similarities.
Differences arise in thermodynamics and kinetics of nucleophilic addition, influenced by:
Sterics: The spatial arrangement of groups around the carbonyl affects nucleophilic attack.
Electronics: The electronic properties can stabilize or destabilize intermediates.
Hydration Rate and Equilibrium Constants
Table 17-1 presents reaction rates and hydration equilibrium for carbonyl compounds (ketones and aldehydes):
Example data:
For a specific ketone, the reaction rate constant is given as 5 imes 10^5 resulting in over 99.9% hydration.
In contrast, another ketone has a hydration rate constant of 2 imes 10^3 with a hydration percentage of 57%.
Another example indicates a rate constant of 1 with less than 1% hydration.
Ketones
Steric repulsion from two alkyl groups on the carbonyl carbon complicates nucleophilic attack, thus destabilizing the hydrate formation.
Aldehydes
Aldehydes have only one alkyl group, reducing steric effects, thus facilitating easier nucleophilic attack.
Electronics: Inductive Effects
Increasing positive charge concentration at the carbonyl carbon enhances susceptibility to nucleophile attack.
Visual Representation:
The pictorial contrast shows different intensities of positive charge at the carbonyl carbon based on alkyl substitution.
Notably, ketones are more stabilized than aldehydes by inductive effects.
Hydride Reducing Agents: LiAlH4 and NaBH4
The hydride anion is represented as H:-, indicating a hydrogen atom with an extra electron, commonly abbreviated as H-.
Common hydride sources:
Sodium Borohydride (NaBH4)
Lithium Aluminum Hydride (LiAlH4) (LAH)
These agents are essential for reduction reactions of polar π bond containing compounds.
Reduction of the Ketone: Example 1
In the presence of a ketone, both NaBH4 and LiAlH4 effectively act as reducing agents, leading to the conversion of butan-2-one to butan-2-ol:
Methodology:
LiAlH4 is used in ether and reflux conditions.
Example yields racemic butan-2-ol at 83% and 80% using different procedures.
Simplified Mechanism
A proton transfer converts the alkoxide anion into the final alcohol product, acknowledging the instability of free H-.
NaBH4 vs. LiAlH4 Reactivity with Proton Sources
NaBH4 can reduce in water (weak acid), allowing simultaneous protonation and reduction, making it more convenient than LiAlH4, which requires two reaction steps:
Treatment with LiAlH4 in ether.
Acid workup with aqueous acid.
LiAlH4 Reactivity with Proton Source
Reacts quickly deprotonating weakly acidic protons from water/alcohols, producing hydrogen gas, which is exothermic and can lead to explosive reactions.
NaBH4 Reactivity with Proton Source
Deprotonation occurs slowly for NaBH4, especially at slightly basic pH, thus being more user-friendly for reductions in protic solvents.
Other Functional Groups and Hydride Agents
Functional groups with polar π bonds (excluding carbonyls) exhibit hydride reactions similarly, such as imines (Schiff bases) in biochemistry.
LiAlH4 Reducing Nitriles
LiAlH4 can reduce nitriles to primary amines.
Introduced through appropriate functional group transformations.
Sodium Hydride (NaH)
Sodium hydride is a strong base but poor nucleophile.
Typically generates carbon nucleophiles via proton transfer processes.
Organometallic Compounds
Strong nucleophiles and bases: Organolithium and Grignard reagents react quickly with water, resulting in exothermic proton transfers.
R⁻ Donors
Free R⁻ does not normally exist but behaves as R⁻ donors in reaction scenarios.
Organolithium Reaction and Its Mechanism
Example:
Reaction with CH3(CH2)3-Li/ether at -65 °C for 3 hours.
Followed by H3O for acid workup producing a new C-C bond and giving a yield of 74%.
Grignard Reaction and Mechanism
Procedure:
Nucleophilic addition via R–MgBr at reflux for 5 hours followed by proton transfer using CH3OH.
Example results in formation of new C-C bonds with a 70% yield through acid workup.
Grignard Reactions and Synthesis of Carboxylic Acids
Highlighting the environmentally friendly synthesis method using greenhouse gasses as electrophiles.
Wittig Reagents and the Wittig Reaction: Synthesis of Alkenes
Defined as compounds characterized by a C-P bond where the C has a ˗1 formal charge, and P holds a +1 formal charge.
Wittig Reaction Mechanism
Step 1: Nucleophilic attack leading to a betaine formation.
Step 2: Coordination step leading to the formation of oxaphosphetane.
Advantages include generation from common alkyl halide precursors.
Mechanism for Generating Wittig Reagents
Step 1: SN2 reaction (nucleophile is Ph3P, leaving group is halide).
Step 2: Deprotonation by alkyllithium species - conditions suitable for such reactions (why alkyllithium as a base?).
Alkyl halide must have at least one H at the C atom bonded to the leaving group.
Sulfonium Ylides: Formation of Epoxides
Similar to phosphonium ylides, characterized by opposite charges on adjacent atoms, with sulfur being positively charged.
Epoxide Formation Using Sulfonium Ylides
Reaction of sulfonium ylides with carbonyls results in epoxide formation via nucleophilic addition followed by an internal SN2 reaction.
Direct Addition vs. Conjugate Addition
In compounds with C=C double bonds conjugated to polar π bonds, two electrophilic sites exist:
Carbonyl carbon (1st electrophilic site)
Alpha carbon (2nd electrophilic site)
Direct 1,2-Addition Mechanism
Nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl carbon results in direct 1,2-addition. After protonation, adjacent atoms show addition in 1,2-positioning.
Conjugate 1,4-Addition Mechanism
Attack at the beta carbon leading to conjugate 1,4-addition.
1,2 vs. 1,4 Addition
Dominance of addition type depends on whether the nucleophile adds reversibly or irreversibly.
Weak nucleophiles typically yield 1,4-addition while strong nucleophiles yield 1,2-addition.
Reversible vs. Irreversible Nucleophilic Addition
Addition type dictates whether products are thermodynamically or kinetically controlled.
Observations
Nucleophiles adding reversibly yield conjugate products as major, while nucleophiles that irreversibly add yield direct products as major.
Examples of each type to be explored.
Trends in Reversibility
Weak or resonance-stabilized nucleophiles (e.g., amide bases, enolates) prefer 1,4-addition. - Enolate 1,4-addition is termed Michael Addition.
Irreversible vs. Reversible Examples
Major products illustrate distinct addition mechanisms influenced by solvent and nucleophile strength.
Thermodynamic vs. Kinetic Control
Control types can affect the product distribution based on reaction conditions, analogous to HBr addition to 1,3-butadiene.
Thermodynamic or Kinetic Products and Free Energy
The conjugate product is more stable, while the direct product forms more rapidly due to stabilization dynamics in the transition state.
Lithium Dialkyl Cuprates
Organocuprates (e.g., R2CuLi) show less reactivity than alkyllithium or Grignard reagents and primarily undergo conjugate addition.
Example Reaction
When treated with a,β-unsaturated carbonyls, R groups add at the beta carbon via conjugate addition.
Alkyllithium vs. Grignard Reagents
Alkyllithium reagents demonstrate a higher selectivity for direct 1,2-addition compared to Grignard reagents.
Organic Synthesis Overview
Notable reaction: Carbonyl compound (ketone/aldehyde) reacts with Grignard/alkyllithium.
Williamson ether synthesis is shown as a multistep route incorporating Grignard attacks.
Further Transformations
Alcohol to alkyl halide via PBr3 followed by reaction with alkoxide salt.
Synthesizing Alkenes: Wittig Reactions Advantage
Wittig reactions generally provide better syntheses of alkenes compared to elimination reactions due to selectivity and product formation.
Retrosynthetic Analysis
Assessing possible synthetical pathways and precursor suitability in organic synthesis problems.