Credentialing & Billing Operations – Weekly Sync Notes

Meeting Context & Objectives
  • Weekly cross-functional credentialing/billing huddle (participants: Michelle, Jay, Amir, Joanna, Martha, Stephanie, Ferris, etc.)
  • Core goals:
    • Track credentialing progress for every state, entity, payer and individual NP/MD.
    • Decide which payers can be billed under RTM (Remote Therapeutic Monitoring) vs. RPM (Remote Physiologic Monitoring) vs. standard E/M.
    • Re-prioritise P-levels (P0 > P1 > P2) after two facility churns and multiple new installs.
    • Identify where billing must be held (to avoid denials) and where back-billing is allowed.
    • Hand off all data wrangling/dashboard work to Jay to free up clinical-ops staff.
Tools, Data & Access
  • “Preset” = current BI tool, but UI is disliked; Jay to evaluate alternatives or augment with Google Sheets.
  • Monday.com boards:
    • Master Credentialing board (insurance rows, P-level, status columns).
    • IPVB column toggles when visits can start.
  • PracticeSuite: source of detailed claim/encounter data; payer IDs stored here.
  • Shared Drive/Google Drive contains IPD money notes; Jay still lacks permissions—temporary screen-cast solution.
  • Slack used for ad-hoc requests; several relevant messages dated 10 July.
  • Key linkage work Jay will build:
    \text{Preset Insurer}\leftrightarrow\text{Monday Insurer}\leftrightarrow\text{Facility}\leftrightarrow\text{Live\/Churned}
  • Need a mapping table for inconsistent payer names (e.g., “Medicaid”, “Medicaid CT”, “800 Medicaid”).
Credentialing Fundamentals
  • Each entity and each individual clinician (NP/MD) must be credentialed with every payer seen.
  • Historic issue: company originally billed almost everyone out-of-network ⇒ mass denials.
  • Medicare is relatively easy and back-dates to effective date; Medicaid does not back-date.
  • Billing logic summary:
    • If credentialed → bill immediately.
    • If Medicare pending → can hold & back-bill after approval.
    • If Medicaid pending → visits before approval = unrecoverable .
  • Ongoing decision tree RTM vs RPM vs E/M driven by payer policy:
    • Example: Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) MI does not cover RTM, so team switched to RPM and now expects 150perCPTper CPT90905vspreviousvs previous59.
    • Need to verify actual collections post-switch.
Priority (P0 / P1 / P2) Logic & Rebuild
  • Original priority spreadsheet used data window Feb 2024 → current.
  • Two top-volume facilities recently uninstalled ⇒ previous P-levels now inaccurate.
  • Jay will automate priority logic inside the sheet:
    \text{If Submitted Claims} > 1000 \Rightarrow P0
    500 \le \text{Claims} \le 999 \Rightarrow P1
    \text{else} \Rightarrow P2
  • Additional column to capture date range of volume snapshot to avoid future confusion.
State-by-State Status & Key Holds

California (largest pain-point)

  • Medi-Cal addresses mismatched; applications had to be withdrawn because virtual lease flagged ⇒ resubmit once physical addresses in Inland Empire & Sonoma found.
  • Kaiser split required: NorCal ≠ SoCal. NorCal still RTM; SoCal moving to RPM.
  • LA Care, Inland Empire Health Plan, Health Plan of San Mateo et al. are Medi-Cal managed plans → apps submitted; waiting.
  • VA Community Care: submitted May, follow-up July; 30–60 day wait.
  • Medicare: Martha (SoCal) still pending; Stephanie (NorCal) hold; Shah signature outstanding.
  • Billing hold list: Humana, IAT, Medi-Cal managed plans, Kaiser (until split), any IPA requiring onsite service address.

Tennessee

  • All NPs approved for Medicare.
  • Medicaid status acceptable; no current holds.

New York

  • Only Lawrence MD pending (Medicare) because Dr Nagawala has not signed; visits may occur but billing must hold until signature.

Michigan

  • Dr Barry credentialing in progress as “backup” (no facilities yet) ⇒ low urgency.
  • BCBS RPM switch date needs to be tagged for analysis.

New Jersey

  • Horizon BCBS is commercial, not Medicaid; separate “800 Medicaid” managed plan exists.
  • 800-page paper packet mailed; waiting response.

Connecticut (Coming Next Month)

  • Two new NPs start Friday; avoid touching CT claims until rostered.
  • Need payer ID cross-check (Anthem BCBS CT vs Anthem national) to know if grouping required.
Payer / Plan Highlights & Edge Cases
  • UHC often fronts for AARP; UHC data must include AARP alias.
  • Scan Medicare Advantage appears in data as “IPA BT”; Jay to trace.
  • ING Insurance: appears as “physician group” rather than standard plan; likely direct facility contract.
  • Medicare SCAN, Medicare Advantage and VA plans may reimburse RPM even if not credentialed for IPV—requires case-by-case confirmation.
  • Example cost–benefit guidance: if extra 9 San Mateo patients unlocked but payer unlikely to reimburse, added visits only increase clinician cost. Use formula
    \text{Net Gain} = \text{Reimb per visit} \times N_{visits} - \text{Clinician Cost per visit}
    and proceed only if \text{Net Gain} > 0.
Data & Analysis Requests for Jay
  1. Build “Revenue Before vs After IPV” dashboard
    • Filter by insurer, state and clinician.
    • Needs “Date of First IPV” field (month-granularity acceptable) manually populated for now.
  2. Auto-flag high-volume churned insurers so Monday priorities drop automatically.
  3. Map all payer name variants to a unique ID (PracticeSuite payer ID ideal key).
  4. Provide weekly export summarising:
    \begin{aligned}
    &\text{Total Submitted Claims},\
    &\text{Total Collected},\
    &\text{Avg Days to Payment},\
    &\text{Top 10 Denied Reasons}
    \end{aligned}
  5. Chase Michael for PracticeSuite extracts; ingest to same G-Sheet if preset import too slow.
Operational Challenges & Decisions Captured
  • Access: Jay still blocked from Drive → temp screen-share.
  • Credentialing lags reduce attainable visits; Ferris demand of 2{,}500 visits may be unrealistic if Humana, Kaiser SoCal, etc., excluded.
  • Facility churn complicates existing analysis; any new dashboard must reference live facilities only.
  • Manual holds create complexity for Michael (billing lead): must know exact dates & payers to suppress.
  • Multiple 1-hour payer helplines (e.g., Anthem) drain ops time; could be off-loaded to junior staff.
  • Ethical/financial caution: do not conduct visits solely to hit volume if payer won’t reimburse—company pays NP but loses revenue.
Immediate Action Items
  • [ ] Grant Jay G-Drive access or move IPD money notes into shared folder.
  • [ ] Populate “Date Initial RPM/IPV” column for each insurer (Michelle + team; tag team).
  • [ ] Split Kaiser entry into “Kaiser NorCal” & “Kaiser SoCal” on Monday board.
  • [ ] Re-calculate P-levels using updated claims; add “Snapshot Date Range” column.
  • [ ] Stephanie (NorCal) + Martha (SoCal) Medicare → HOLD billing until approved; notify Michael.
  • [ ] Withdraw current Medi-Cal apps; resubmit once physical addresses secured.
  • [ ] Jay to produce first pass “Before vs After IPV” revenue chart by next meeting.
  • [ ] Remind Michael: continue to hold all Medi-Cal claims; Medicare can be back-billed.
  • [ ] Confirm if Anthem BCBS national and BCBS CT share same payer ID (PracticeSuite lookup).
Key Numbers & References
  • RTM typical BCBS reimbursement: \$59 per claim.
  • RPM (CPT 90905)reportedreimbursement:) reported reimbursement:\$150.
  • Sample extra volume: +9 San Mateo patients; +3 VA; +33 Medicare SoCal.
  • Target visits: 2{,}500 per month (Ferris’ target).
  • VA response SLA: 3060 days.
  • Slack note with KCC whitelist credentials sent 10$$ July.

(End of prepared study notes.)