Case Study: Disgust and Phobia of Buttons

BACKGROUND: CLASSICAL CONDITIONING

  • Classical Conditioning: A learning procedure in which associations are made between two stimuli.

    • Neutral Stimulus (NS): Initially does not elicit a response.

    • Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS): Elicits a predictable response without training.

    • Unconditioned Response (UCR): Automatic or natural reaction to a stimulus without training.

    • Conditioned Stimulus (CS): Elicits a response due to being paired with an UCS.

    • Conditioned Response (CR): The learned reaction to a CS.

BACKGROUND: EXPECTANCY LEARNING

  • Expectancy Learning: Presentation of a previously neutral object/event associated with a negative outcome increases fear of that object/event.

    • Example: Fear of exams leads to anxiety during classes.

BACKGROUND: EVALUATIVE LEARNING

  • Evaluative Learning: Individuals come to evaluate a neutral object negatively without being aware of the association with negative outcomes.

    • Results in feelings of Disgust.

    • Example: Feeling above lowly tasks, such as exam-taking.

DISGUST AND PHOBIA

  • Disgust is a distinct emotion from fear and can lead to the evaluation of stimuli as repulsive.

  • Conditioned experiences can result in irrational phobias combining disgust with fear.

  • Examples:

    • Arachibutyrophobia: Fear of peanut butter sticking to the roof of the mouth.

    • Arithmophobia: Fear of numbers.

    • Koumpounophobia: Fear of buttons.

TREATING DISGUST

  • Research by Hepburn and Page (1999): Affirmed addressing disgust can aid in curing hemophobia (fear of blood).

  • Study by De Jong et al. (1997): Suggested reduction in disgust could ease fear of spiders.

PHOBIA IN DSM-5

  • Phobias classified under Anxiety Disorders in DSM-5.

  • Defined as persistent fear or anxiety that is excessively out of proportion to actual danger posed.

  • Types of phobias:

    • Specific Phobias: Fear of a specific object or situation.

    • Social Phobia: Fear of social situations.

    • Agoraphobia: Fear of being in situations where escape might be difficult.

CAUSES OF PHOBIA

  • Many phobias may be rooted in evolution, supporting the nature argument in the nature/nurture debate.

    • Example: Acrophobia (fear of heights) may relate to dangers faced by ancestors.

KOUMPOUNOPHOBIA

  • Koumpounophobia: Fear and aversion to buttons.

  • Notable case: Steve Jobs' aversion influenced the rise of touch-screen phones and fashion sense.

  • Symptoms:

    • Aversion to sight, sound, or texture of buttons; some unable to tolerate certain button types.

STUDY AIM

  • Aim: Investigate classical conditioning's role in fear and avoidance of buttons, comparing:

    1. Positive reinforcement therapy

    2. Imagery exposure therapy

RESEARCH METHOD AND SAMPLE

  • Clinical Case Study:

    • Focused on one 9-year-old Hispanic-American boy who experiences koumpounophobia since age 5.

    • Data collected through self-reports at Child Anxiety and Phobia program at Florida International University.

    • Symptoms measured using a 9-point scale called “Feelings Thermometer.”

INTERVENTION PROCESS

  • Phobia: Severely impacted daily functioning; boy unable to dress himself.

  • A hierarchy of feared stimuli was developed through discussions with the boy and mother.

1ST INTERVENTION: POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT
  • Approach: Awarded for showing less fear; rewards assigned post successful handling of buttons.

  • Sessions: 4, lasting 20-30 minutes each.

    • Objective data: Number of buttons touched + self-report distress ratings were measured.

    • Hierarchy of fear respected, beginning with less feared buttons.

2ND INTERVENTION: IMAGERY EXPOSURE
  • Sessions 5-11 focused on visualization techniques rather than real buttons.

  • Included disgust-related exposures and coping strategies.

    • Exercises involved imagining buttons falling on him and discussing feelings about these images.

RESULTS OF THERAPIES

Positive Reinforcement Results
  • Initial success in increasing button handling numbers; however, overall feelings of disgust increased with each session.

Imagery Exposure Results
  • Effective in addressing disgust; showed long-term reduction in distress levels associated with buttons.

  • From initial distress rating of 8 for button imagery falling on him, ratings decreased to 3 by the end of therapy.

  • Follow-ups at 6 and 12 months indicated minimal distress; no longer classified as phobic.

CONCLUSIONS

  • Treatment was deemed successful; cognitive and emotional aspects of disgust crucial for forming new associations with phobias.

  • Imagery exposure proved beneficial for long-lasting distress reduction.

EVALUATION OF THE STUDY

  • Assess strengths and weaknesses including:

    • Generalizability

    • Reliability

    • Application to Everyday Life

    • Validity

    • Ethics

    • Quantitative vs. Qualitative Data

    • Standardization

    • Experimenter Bias

    • Demand Characteristics