Expert Witnesses & Trial
Role of Expert Witnesses
Purpose of Being Called to Court:
As a witness (lay or expert) for a trial, hearings, or motions.
As a consultant for private entities, where testimony may not be required, but assistance to the client is provided.
Fundamental Principles:
Must always be OBJECTIVE.
Must always have INTEGRITY.
Phases of Trial Proceedings
Phase 1: "Voir Dire"
Definition: A crucial part of the trial process involving jury selection or deselection.
Traditional Trial: Forensic scientists assist their legal team in identifying jury members who are most likely to understand and be receptive to their side's evidence and arguments.
Bench Trial: In cases decided by a judge (without a jury), forensic scientists may not need to provide services as the judge is presumed to possess relevant knowledge.
Phase 2: Opening Statements
Purpose: To provide a persuasive roadmap for the jury, outlining how the case will proceed.
Order of Presentation:
The side initiating the case presents first (the plaintiff in civil cases or the prosecution in public criminal cases).
Opportunity to inform the jury about the forthcoming evidence.
The opposing side then delivers their opening statement.
Role of Forensic Scientist:
Explain the meaning and significance of the evidence to the attorney.
Assist the attorney in incorporating this information into their opening statement to build a compelling narrative.
Phase 3: Evidence Presentation
Probative Information: Information that makes a material fact more or less likely to occur.
Goal: To assist the trier of fact (typically by educating the jury).
Discovery: The process where all information for building a case's story is gathered.
Evidence: What is formally introduced to the jury.
Examples: Documents, physical evidence, testimonial evidence, etc.
All types of evidence hold equal weight to the jury.
Role of Forensic Scientist:
Prosecution/Plaintiff: Primarily involved in working for this side, presenting evidence.
Defense: Commonly serves as a consultant.
Called upon to defend against evidence already presented by the moving party.
Asked to explain complex evidence.
May be required to check the work and findings of the state's expert witness (e.g., prosecution's expert).
Phase 4: Closing Statements
Purpose: To connect the law to the presented evidence persuasively.
Advocacy: An opportunity for attorneys to advocate for a specific position (e.g., why the defendant should be found guilty or not guilty).
Interpretation: The attorney interprets the facts from the presented evidence in light of the law, aiming for the jury to believe their side of the story.
Presentation: Both sides deliver closing statements.
Phase 5: Decision (Guilty or Not Guilty)
Jury Deliberation: Exclusively involves the jury, who carefully consider the evidence.
Advice and explanations provided by experts (including forensic scientists) are intended to aid the jury in their decision-making.
Verdict Rendered: The jury delivers its verdict.
Guilty: The evidence presented sufficiently supports the prosecution's narrative.
Not Guilty: The evidence presented does not adequately support the prosecution's narrative, meaning they failed to meet the legal burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is important to note that a