Interview Practicum: Tips and Suggestions

Interview Practicum: Tips and Suggestions

General Tips
  • Be Interested, Not Interesting: Be genuinely curious about the interviewee's views and experiences.
    • Engaging a person requires a clear and simple topic introduction.
    • Disclose hypotheses later in the conversation for better engagement.
  • Start with Basic Questions:
    • Begin with WHAT questions to ease into the conversation using personal experiences.
    • Gradually lead towards HOW and WHY questions for depth.
  • Maintain Flow: Avoid abrupt transitions during the conversation; aim for smooth elaborations based on responses.
  • Limit Topics: Focus on fewer main topics to ensure thorough exploration.
    • Always consider asking about alternative hypotheses or explanations from the interviewee.
  • Resources: Utilize textbooks like Neuman and Robson for further guidance.
Formulating the Right Questions
  • Focus on Individual Beliefs: Ask interviewees about their personal beliefs rather than general opinions about others.
    • Ensure questions reflect their personal insight rather than expert analysis.
  • Prioritize Big Questions: Start with significant inquiries, e.g.,
    • “Why did you intend to vote?” followed by
    • “Would you vote more if your polling location was closer?”
  • Avoid Overgeneralization:
    • Understand that a small number of interviews may not represent larger groups effectively.
    • Prefer specific control groups (e.g., three young individuals vs. diverse groups) to ensure the validity of comparisons.
Hypothesis Development
  • Falsifiability of Hypothesis: Ensure that your hypothesis can be challenged and adjusted based on interview findings.
  • Dynamic Adjustments: Be open to modifying your hypothesis as responses dictate; this may lead to valuable insights even if it diverges from original plans.
Approach to Interviews
  • Flexibility:
    • Adapt during the interview rather than strictly adhering to a scripted format.
    • Avoid questions that simply ask for self-rankings without follow-up inquiries.
  • Exploring Similarities and Differences:
    • When there are apparent differences, investigate for similarities, and vice versa.
  • Seek Deeper Understanding: Focus on the How and Why for more impactful insights.
    • Example of inquiry: “What influences your thoughts on whether Canada is a meritocracy?”
  • Encourage Reflection: Allow interview subjects to reconsider their initial responses and develop nuanced viewpoints.
Goals of Practicum Exercise
  • Skill Development:
    • Practice various interviewing techniques and get constructive feedback.
  • Question Sequencing:
    • Evaluate the flow of questions to ensure comprehensive exploration of topics.
  • Learning from Peers:
    • Observe examples of effective questioning and avoid common pitfalls.
Practicum Plan
  • Pair Interviews:
    • Conduct 25-30 minute interviews where each participant gets an opportunity to interview and critique one another.
    • Begin with positive feedback, followed by constructive criticism.
  • Revisit and Adjust:
    • After interviews, reflect on the guide and make necessary changes based on experiences.
Future Reading Assignment: Hart and Rogers Articles
  • Hart's Assertions:
    • Challenges common portrayals of youth as disengaged; focus on interviews to illustrate their community engagement.
    • Illustrates diversity and belonging as key themes for empowering youth.
  • Using Quotations in Research:
    • Hart employs brief quotations to support larger points, often drawing comparisons to other comments.
  • Rogers on Identity:
    • Explains how qualitative research can unravel the influence of identity on attitudes and behaviors.
    • Explore whether identities serve as variables or constants affecting perspectives.
Examples of Identity as a Factor
  • Identity Connection:
    • Investigate whether individuals feel a strong connection to their identity group.
    • Responses can illustrate how shared experiences influence personal perspectives (e.g., business owners considering tax implications).
  • Judgment Based on Group Treatment:
    • Analyze whether people's views are shaped by the treatment of their identity group within society, affecting their sense of collective responsibility.