humanistic
AO1
emphasises the importance of subjective experience and each person’s capacity for self determination, that every human has free will
due to this, scientific models are rejected, as humans are too unique to make general laws about
maslow’s hierarchy of needs
outlines the criteria necessary to be met before a person is able to achieve the primary goal of humans: self actualisation
physiological needs need to be met - hunger
safety and security
love and belongingness
self esteem
self actualisation - desire to grow psychologically and fulfil one’s potential (only 1% of the population actually achieve this)
rogers - idea of congruence
where ideal self is too stark in contrast to the individual’s concept of self
self actualisation not possible due to negative feelings of self worth
rogers developed client centred therapy to help bridge the gap between the concept of self and the ideal self - either by making the ideal self seem unreachable or boosting one’s own self concept
noticed that many psychological issues stem from childhoods with parents who gave conditional love so therapists should give unconditional positive regard to individuals who lacked it as children
AO3
one strength of this approach is that it is holistic
holism refers to the idea that behaviour can only be understood in the context of the whole person
this means that the humanistic approach does not oversimplify human behaviour and understands that the context of that person’s behaviour can result in unique behaviour
this approach acknowledges individual differences and rejects general laws because they clash with these differences
therefore, this approach may have more validity than other approaches
however, a limitation could be that it lacks RWA
it takes on a very idiographic approach, believing all humans are unique and approaching behaviour on a person-centred basis but this means it cannot help groups of people on a larger scale. nomothetic approaches hold a strength in that, by establishing general laws, they can help larger numbers of people (ie SSRIs to treat depression)
by contrast, the humanistic approach’s main applicability is through counselling which for many, may be inaccessible or inconvenient
this means that the humanistic is not the ideal method of treatment or help for many people
a further limitation is that it suffers from cultural bias, specifically beta bias
it minimises the differences between cultures because self actualisation may be accepted in western, individualist cultures like the US but in non-western, collectivist cultures there may be a stronger emphasis on interdependence. they may instead view it as self indulgent
therefore, maslow’s hierarchy of needs lacks validity because not every culture may strive for self actualisation. this weakens the central assumption of the approach