Neg
Article Information
Title: Determination of Aflatoxin M1 in whey powder by HPLC and ELISA methods
Authors: Mahboubeh Shaneshin, Hoda Noursalehi, Zahra Mousavi, Zeinab Pourjabbara, Mannan Hajimahmoodi
Affiliations:
Drug and Food Control Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Food and Drug Administration, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pharmacology & Toxicology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Journal: J Food Safe & Hyg
Publication Date: Winter & Spring 2018
Keywords: Aflatoxins; HPLC; ELISA; Whey powder
Abstract
Whey powder is widely used in the food industry and must be free from toxins such as Aflatoxin M1 to ensure consumer health.
Study aimed to determine Aflatoxin M1 levels in whey powder from two domestic factories.
Methodology:
Samples collected over 8 months (Dec 2014 - July 2015).
44 samples assessed using ELISA; 26 samples analyzed via HPLC-FLD.
Results:
44 samples (52.4%) were below the safety limit (1000 ppt).
40 samples (47.6%) exceeded the maximum tolerance limit.
Average concentration was 1100.2 ± 734.8 ppt; range 200 - 7000 ppt.
No significant seasonal impact on Aflatoxin M1 levels was observed.
Conclusion: Contamination of whey powder with Aflatoxin M1 poses health risks.
Introduction
Aflatoxins:
Fungal toxins produced by Aspergillus species under favorable conditions (moisture, heat).
Found in agricultural products like peanuts and grains.
Types: Eighteen known types, including Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and its metabolite Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1).
AFM1 is stable and resistant to degradation during pasteurization.
Health Risks:
AFM1 is classified as a carcinogen by IARC and WHO.
Commonly detected in milk from cattle fed contaminated fodder.
Methods
2.1. Samples
84 whey powder samples from two Iranian factories analyzed (Dec 2014 - July 2015).
26 samples were further analyzed using HPLC.
2.2. Chemicals and Reagents
ELISA conducted using Ridascreen AFM1 kit; HPLC using HPLC-grade acetonitrile and dehydrated water.
2.3. ELISA Procedure
Samples prepared by dissolving 10g in 100ml water, followed by heating and centrifugation.
AFM1 measured using ELISA by following manufacturer's protocol.
Standard curve prepared to calculate concentration using various concentrations of AFM1.
2.4. HPLC Procedure
2.4.1. Sample Preparation
5g whey powder mixed with water, then centrifuged to separate oil and prepare for purification.
Samples treated with immunoaffinity chromatography for AFM1 purification.
2.4.2. Apparatus
HPLC setup included Agilent 1200 series; column ZORBAX Eclipse-XDB C18.
2.5. Method Validation
Linearity assessed with correlation coefficients and limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) calculated.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Data analyzed using t-test and ANOVA; significance at p < 0.05.
Results
Calibration curves generated for AFM1 using both ELISA and HPLC methods.
Contamination Levels:
84 samples: 44 (52.4%) less than 1000 ppt, 40 (47.6%) exceeded the limit.
HPLC confirmed findings; no significant difference between ELISA and HPLC results.
Discussion
AFM1 presents serious health risks; thorough evaluation of milk quality is essential.
No seasonal impact observed; this study aligns with similar research findings.
Identified contamination in products requires ongoing monitoring.
Conclusion
AFM1 detected in whey powders indicates potential health risks to consumers.
Recommendations include using high-quality milk to mitigate contamination.
Acknowledgements
Supported by a grant from the Drug and Food Control Dept., Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
References
Comprehensive list of studies related to AFM1 contamination, methodology, and health implications.