123-129

Chapter 14: The Bauhaus - The Evolution of an Idea (1919-32)

14.1 Formation and Ideological Background

  • The Bauhaus emerged in 1919 from a conflict between craft and fine art education.

  • Founded by Walter Gropius, it combined the Academy of Art and the School of Arts and Crafts.

  • Influenced by earlier attempts to reform applied art education in Germany through figures like Bruno Taut, Karl Schmidt, and Henry van de Velde.

  • Aimed to unify different disciplines (architecture, sculpture, painting) into a cohesive art form for the future.

14.2 Early Vision and Influences

  • The term "Bauhaus" recalled medieval masons' lodges, suggesting collaboration and craftsmanship.

  • Oskar Itten’s arrival in 1919 brought an emphasis on individual creativity based on progressive educational theories.

  • Itten pioneered a Vorkurs (preliminary course) to enhance creativity and skill among students.

  • Tensions arose from differing visions of art education, particularly between Gropius's ideas and Itten’s more anarchic stance.

14.3 Key Personalities and Conflicts

  • The Bauhaus saw the emergence of figures like Theo van Doesburg and Wassily Kandinsky, who contributed contrasting artistic philosophies.

  • Gropius began to shift the Bauhaus towards a more industrial approach, moving away from Itten's focus on the spiritual and mystical.

  • The factionalism within the Bauhaus culminated in Itten's resignation and the entrance of László Moholy-Nagy, who advocated for a pragmatic direction in design and education.

14.4 Transformation Under Moholy-Nagy

  • Moholy-Nagy introduced a more structured curriculum focused on preparing students for mass production.

  • Emphasized the relationship between art and industry, culminating in the creation of functional objects aligned with modern needs.

  • This transitional period saw practical assignments in materials such as wood and metal, reinforcing the Bauhaus's connection to industry.

14.5 Architectural Developments and Philosophy

  • Gropius's designs shifted towards mass production concepts, reflected in the development of serial housing and modern architectural styles.

  • Emphasis on furnishings and fixtures designed to be efficient and economically produced.

  • Progressive ideas began to face backlash from socio-political forces, as the Bauhaus adapted to changing economic conditions.

14.6 Decline and Closure of the Bauhaus

  • As political tensions grew, the Bauhaus was increasingly pressured to conform to nationalist ideologies, impacting its direction.

  • Gropius resigned, leading to Hannes Meyer’s leadership, which further curtailed the artistic aspects for a more utilitarian focus.

  • The shift towards social responsibility marked the final stages before the Bauhaus's closure in 1932, following intense political opposition.