The nature of law
The Australian legal system
Common law legal system
Australian court hierarchy
Sources of law
Doctrine of precedent
Recognising cases and legislation
A system of rules (legal rules)
Enforceable by courts
Regulate, control, influence behaviour
Set standards of conduct
Resolve conflict: Hear and settle disputes
Provide security
A body of principles established by:
Parliament (i.e. elected representatives), and
Courts (i.e. judges)
A set of rules to determine the rights, duties, and obligations of people who are engaged in commercial activities.
Common law system as a system of law
Main feature: Judges’ decisions in pending cases are informed by the decisions of previously settled cases
Developed in the United Kingdom
Distinct from civil law systems
Australia was a British colony
Enacted law: made by parliaments
Also known as:
Statute law
Legislation
Act of Parliament
Unenacted law: made by the courts
Also known as:
Common law
Case law
Precedent
Each Act has a name e.g. Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
The name of the Act
The year of enactment
The enacting legislature
After a case is decided, a written ‘law report’ is published
Each case has its own citation, e.g. L Shaddock & Partners Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (1981) 150 CLR 225
The name of the case
The year of the law report
The law report series
Where disputes between two parties are heard and resolved
Courts are ranked in a hierarchy from the lowest to the highest level of authority in the legal system
The court hierarchy has three significant purposes:
Allows different forms of hearing according to the seriousness of the case Administrative convenience & economy of operation
Provides a system of appeals
Instrumental in building up precedent
High Court of Australia
State/Territory Courts
Supreme Court
Intermediate Courts (County/District Courts)
Lower Courts (Local/Magistrates Court)
Commonwealth Courts
Federal Court
Family Court
Federal Magistrates Court
Rules of the Doctrine of Precedent
Lower courts in a judicial hierarchy are bound by earlier decisions of courts higher up in the same judicial hierarchy
A decision of a court in a different hierarchy or lower in the same hierarchy may be persuasive but will not be binding
Generally, a court is not bound by its own decisions
Promote certainty, consistency and predictability
Binding precedent
Decisions of a previous case of a higher court in the same judicial hierarchy that the lower court is obliged to follow
Persuasive precedent
Decisions of a superior court in a different/same level of hierarchy have persuasive value
Seriously considered; may or may not be followed
Ratio decidendi
‘The reason for the decision’
Binding
Obiter dicta
‘Remarks in passing’
Not binding; may be persuasive
Each court is bound by decisions of courts higher in its hierarchy
A decision of a court in a different hierarchy or lower in the same hierarchy may be persuasive but will not be binding
Generally, a court is not bound by its own decisions
A case came before the Supreme Court of Victoria which handed down a decision. The impact this decision has on later decisions by:
a) the Victorian District Court is Binding.
b) the Supreme Court of NSW is Persuasive.
c) the High Court of Australia is Persuasive.