Vocabulary Flashcards: History and Structure of U.S. Health Care (Video Notes)
Introduction
Knowledge of the history of health care is essential for understanding today’s medical delivery system.
Historical foundations explain why the U.S. did not adopt a government-run national health care system as in Canada or Great Britain.
The United States has predominantly a private health care industry with substantial government financing.
Historical forces shaping U.S. health care delivery:
Cultural beliefs and values: Self-reliance; Welfare assistance for the needy.
Social makeup: Demographic shifts; Immigration; Health status; Urbanization.
Technological advances: Scientific research; New treatments; Training of health professionals; Facilities and equipment; Information technology.
Economic constraints: Health care costs; Private and public health insurance; Family incomes.
Political opportunism: President’s agenda; Political party ideology; Political maneuvers; Power of interest groups; Laws and regulations.
Ecological forces: New diseases; Drug-resistant infections; Global travel and transport.
The agents of change interact in complex ways (example): President Obama’s political agenda helped enact the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 via ideological and political maneuvering, despite economic constraints.
American beliefs (capitalism, self-reliance, limited government) have shielded the system from a full government takeover; compromises produced Medicare/Medicaid and other public programs for defined groups.
Advancements in science and technology increased specialization in medicine, with primary care given secondary importance.
This chapter traces evolution through four historical periods, each marking a major structural change:
Preindustrial era (mid-18th century to late 19th century)
Postindustrial era (late 19th century)
Corporate era (started ~1970s, continuing into the 21st century)
Era of health care reform (politically motivated reforms like the ACA; ongoing debates about repeal/replace)
Four Historical Periods of U.S. Health Care Delivery
Preindustrial era: mid-18th century to late 19th century
Postindustrial era: late 19th century onward
Corporate era: developments starting around 1970 and continuing into the 21st century
Era of health care reform: politically motivated reforms (e.g., ACA); ongoing uncertainty about future direction
Medical Services in Preindustrial America
From colonial times to the late 1800s, U.S. medical education and practice lagged behind Britain, France, and Germany.
Medicine had a domestic, not professional, character; procedures were primitive.
Few hospitals; no health insurance (private or public); care paid out of pocket; free market in delivery of services.
Main characteristics (Exhibit 3.2):
Medical training not grounded in science; primitive procedures; intense competition because almost anyone could practice medicine.
People relied on family, neighbors, and publications for remedies; physicians’ fees paid out of personal funds; health care delivered in a free market.
Hospitals few, in big cities; poor sanitation; unskilled staff; almshouses served destitute and disruptive elements; pesthouses quarantined contagious diseases.
Dispensaries provided outpatient charity care.
Medical training (until ~1870): apprenticeship with practicing physicians; few medical schools; many schools formed by small groups of physicians.
42 such schools in operation in 1850.
MD degree often conferred without high school prerequisites; curriculum low in science; laboratories non-existent; clinical observation limited.
Medical practice: viewed as a trade rather than a profession; no rigorous training, residency, licensing, or board exams; primitive therapies (bleeding, emetics, purgatives, enemas).
Mental illness treated with inhumane methods; Dr. Benjamin Rush advocated bleeding, purging, hot/cold baths, mercury.
Surgery limited (no anesthesia or antisepsis); stethoscope, X-ray, clinical thermometer not yet available; diagnosis based on senses and experience.
Clergy and tradesmen (barbers, tailors, etc.) often provided medical services; free entry led to intense competition and lower physician status.
Rural self-reliance: families used folk remedies; paying for care out of pocket limited access; long travel times to reach physicians.
Medical Institutions in Preindustrial America
Before the 1880s, the U.S. had only a few isolated hospitals in major cities; general hospital expansion occurred earlier in Europe.
U.S. hospitals: deplorable sanitary conditions; nurses unskilled; care often riskier in hospital than at home; hospitals seen as places of last resort.
Almshouses (poorhouses) were the forerunners of hospitals and nursing homes; provided food, shelter, and basic nursing care for the destitute and disruptive.
Asylums (lunatic asylums) were for untreatable, chronic mental illness; early psychiatric care included physical and psychological techniques (e.g., tranquilizer chair, spinning gyrator).
Pesthouses isolated contagious diseases to contain spread.
Dispensaries functioned as outpatient clinics offering free basic care and drugs to ambulatory patients; staffed by young physicians/students for clinical experience; later evolved into today’s free/charitable clinics (approx. 1,400 nationwide).
Medical Training (Expanded)
Apprenticeship dominated until ~1870; many preceptors themselves poorly trained.
1850: ~42 medical schools; low-cost operation; profitable; often affiliated with local colleges to confer degrees.
MD program: 2 years of study; 3–4 months per year during first year, then largely repeating the same content in second year.
Fees paid per course; low standards to attract students; limited scientific curriculum; no laboratories or research focus.
Medical Practice (Expanded)
Early practice resembled a trade; lacks clinical standards, licensing, or formal residency.
Therapeutics: bleeding, emetics, purgatives; mental illness misinterpreted as aberrant behavior; humane care limited.
Surgery: limited by lack of anesthesia and antiseptic techniques; diagnostic tools scarce (no stethoscope, X-ray, microscope).
Physicians relied on lay networks; many professions and tradesmen offered medical remedies; authority fragmented.
Hospitals and Health Care Institutions (Expanded)
Almshouses: urban centers to care for the destitute; often housed various roles (infirmary, old-age facility, mental asylum, homeless shelter, orphanage).
Asylums: state-run for chronic mental illness; used coercive techniques; aim to restore rational thinking.
Pesthouses: quarantine contagious diseases to protect cities.
Dispensaries: outpatient care for those who could not pay; staffed by young physicians/students; forerunners of modern free clinics.
Postindustrial America: Key Developments (Overview)
Growth of medical profession aided by urbanization, scientific advances, and reforms in medical education.
Private practice became dominant; physicians organized into a cohesive profession, moved toward specialization, gained power/prestige.
Hospitals emerged as repositories for high-tech facilities and equipment; private and public health insurance began to take root.
Notable developments (Exhibit 3.3):
Urbanization
Scientific discoveries and medical applications: advanced science-based treatments
Medical education reform
Rising health care costs; imbalance between specialists and generalists
Organized medicine: control over medical training; licensing laws; opposition to national health insurance; private entrepreneurship in practice
Hospitals becoming true medical care institutions; reform of mental health care; growth of private health insurance; creation of Medicare and Medicaid
Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries (Exhibit 3.4)
Anesthesia and its impact on surgery: nitrous oxide used around 1846; ether and chloroform followed; surgeons valued for speed and capability.
Handwashing and aseptic technique: Ignaz Semmelweis (~1847) linked to puerperal fever; practice of handwashing reduced mortality.
Germ theory and microbiology: Louis Pasteur (1860s) demonstrated sterilization and air exposure controls.
Antiseptic surgery: Joseph Lister (1865) popularized antisepsis with carbolic acid.
X-rays and radiology: discovered by Wilhelm Roentgen (1895); radiology became a medical specialty.
Penicillin: Alexander Fleming (1929) discovered antibacterial properties.
Postindustrial Era: Benefits and Dilemmas
Benefits: science-driven practice; increased specialization and availability of advanced technologies.
Undesirable effects: overemphasis on technology and specialization; higher costs without proportional health status gains; underemphasis on primary care and continuity of care.
Other nations’ emphasis on primary care (continuous care by PCPs and nurses) contrasted with the U.S. focus on specialization.
The American Medical Association (AMA)
The AMA galvanized the medical profession and protected physicians’ interests; organized medicine united physicians against uncoordinated practice.
Founded in 1847; strength grew by delegating power to county/state societies; controlled medical education; supported licensing laws; opposed national health insurance.
In the postindustrial era, private practice remained dominant; employment by hospitals/insurance companies was discouraged to preserve physician independence.
AMA’s influence helped raise physician incomes and consolidate professional power; laws restricted drug access to prescriptions by physicians.
Educational Reform (1870–Early 1900s)
Reform began around 1870 as medical schools affiliated with universities.
Harvard Medical School (1871): extended academic year (4 → 9 months); length of education (2 → 3 years); introduced lab instruction and clinical courses (chemistry, physiology, anatomy, pathology).
Johns Hopkins University (1893): graduate-based medical education requiring college degree; residency training in teaching hospital; model for other schools.
Flexner Report (1910): critical evaluation of medical schools; standardization, accreditation, and closure of substandard schools; AMA Council on Medical Education promoted licensing standards.
Other milestones: Howard University School of Medicine (1869) and Meharry Medical College (1876) established to train Black physicians post-Civil War.
Development of Hospitals and Mental Health Reform
Hospitals: centralization of expensive technology; hospitals became core centers for diagnosis, treatment, and education of personnel.
Sanitation improvements and professionalization of nursing contributed to better patient outcomes.
Physicians largely dictated hospital affairs; hospital employment of physicians remained relatively limited historically (hospitalists as a modern phenomenon).
Mental health reform: federal policy promoted psychiatry education/research; by the 1960s, community mental health and deinstitutionalization emerged, aided by new drug therapies.
Olmstead v. L.C. (1999): required states to provide community-based services where appropriate for people with mental illness; today mental health care emphasizes community-based services except for severe cases.
History of Health Insurance: Private Roots and Public Programs
Early private insurance emerged during the industrialization era; private voluntary health insurance expanded as care costs rose.
Kerr-Mills Act (1960): federal grants to states to extend welfare health services to low-income elderly; faced implementation challenges and stigma concerns; deemed ineffective after 3 years.
Medicare/Medicaid birth: Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society (1964) led to three-part system in 1965: Medicare Part A (hospital/nursing home), Part B (physician/outpatient), Medicaid (means-tested; state-administered with federal matching funds).
Emergence of private insurance: Blue Cross/Blue Shield (hospital coverage via nonprofit plans) and Blue Shield (physician services) emerged during/after the Great Depression; AMA initially endorsed hospital plans but opposed physician-only plans; the private system evolved with hospital-based and physician-based coverage.
Blue Cross (1929 Baylor University Hospital plan) and Blue Shield (1939 California Medical Association plan) laid the groundwork for employer-based coverage and a larger insurance market.
1940–1950: dramatic rise in hospital insurance coverage (from about 9% to 57% of the population) as employers offered insurance as a fringe benefit during wage controls and tax policies.
1974: Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans began merging; today they function as joint entities or closely aligned organizations.
Employment-Based Health Insurance
Three key factors behind employer-based coverage:
World War II wage freezes pushed firms to offer health insurance to attract/retain workers.
1948 Supreme Court ruling made employee benefits a legitimate part of union-management negotiations.
1954 Internal Revenue Code amendment made employer-paid health coverage tax-exempt, making it an attractive fringe benefit.
Over time, employment-based coverage became the primary vehicle for health care financing in the U.S.
Failure of National Health Insurance in the United States (Exhibit 3.5)
Key reasons for failure:
Labor and political stability differences: Europe had more labor unrest; the U.S. decentralized system provided less federal control.
Decentralization limited direct federal regulation of social policy.
The German system was condemned during World War I; the term socialized medicine became a pejorative label for national health insurance.
AMA opposition and political lobbying opposed broad government involvement; other groups also resisted.
Middle-class American beliefs in capitalism, self-determination, and distrust of big government.
Tax concerns: willingness to support tax-funded universal coverage was lacking.
Medicare and Medicaid: Creation and Differences (Exhibit 3.6)
Before 1965: private insurance dominant; the elderly, unemployed, and poor relied on scarce public programs or charity.
Forand Bill (1957) initiated momentum to include hospital and nursing home care with Social Security; Kerr-Mills Act provided federal grants to extend services but implementation lagged; deemed ineffective.
1964–1965 Great Society enacted Medicare and Medicaid:
Medicare: Part A (hospital insurance) and Part B (physician/ outpatient); no means test; uniform nationwide program attached to Social Security.
Medicaid: means-tested, state-administered with federal matching funds; varies by state; stigma of public welfare.
Part C (managed care) and Part D (prescription drugs) added later (Medicare 1997 Part C; 2003 Part D).
Key distinctions:
Medicare: nationwide, federal program; eligibility is elderly or certain disabled/ ESRD individuals; funded by payroll tax, general revenues, and premiums.
Medicaid: state-run with federal funding; eligibility based on income; supports low-income individuals.
Medicare and Medicaid: Expansion and Impact
Soon after inception, Medicare/Medicaid coverage expanded rapidly:
By 1970: roughly of Americans on Medicare and on Medicaid.
Costs and regulation:
Expansion increased government regulation of health care delivery and reimbursement; the regulatory reach of federal programs grew over time.
Administrative structure:
Health Care Financing Administration (now Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) created in 1977 to manage Medicare/Medicaid separately from SSA.
Economic impact (1965–1970): GDP growth per year, while health care expenditures grew at much higher rates: federal , state/local (relative to GDP growth).
Health Care in the Corporate Era
Late 20th century to early 21st century: rise of large corporations, rapid advances in communications/transport/trade; globalization affected health care delivery.
Corporatization of health care delivery:
Managed care becomes primary source of insurance and delivery; huge purchasing power enables cost containment with discounts and care-controls.
Providers consolidated into larger integrated delivery systems (IDSs) to offer full service arrays: inpatient, outpatient, primary care, multispecialty outpatient, home health, long-term care, rehabilitation.
Hospitals and physician groups consolidate; physicians often become employees of hospitals/large corporations; physicians’ autonomy challenged by corporate structures.
Information revolution:
Telemedicine and e-health transform care delivery; distant examinations, telesurgery, online access to information and services.
Patients gain more decision-making power via Internet access to information.
Globalization:
Cross-border trade in health services includes four modes (Mutchnick et al., 2005):
Cross-country telemedicine and outsourcing of certain services (e.g., teleradiology) with US-licensed radiologists overseas.
Medical tourism: patients travel abroad (e.g., India, Thailand) for procedures at lower costs.
Foreign direct investment in health services: U.S. providers and equipment/services operate internationally (e.g., Chindex in China; Johns Hopkins Medicine International; Cleveland Clinic; Duke Global Health).
Health professionals migrate to higher-demand economies, improving access in some places but creating shortages in others.
Consequences: increased complexity and consolidation; tension between corporate interests and professional autonomy; global interdependence in health care provision.
Era of Health Care Reform (ACA and Beyond)
ACA (2010) marked a major reform aimed at expanding health insurance to the uninsured; politically contentious and widely litigated.
Political dynamics:
ACA had broad support within the Democratic coalition; the AMA supported the legislation, though the AMA’s influence has waned since its heyday.
Supreme Court decisions shaped ACA implementation: 2012 upheld individual mandate as a tax; 2012/2013 decisions limited federal coercion over state Medicaid expansion.
Religious liberty issues and contraceptive mandate:
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014): for closely held corporations with religious objections, ACA contraceptive mandate violated Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
2017 exemptions to contraceptive mandate expanded for certain entities with religious/moral objections; challenged by states; Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania (2020) upheld the exemptions.
Repeal/replace attempts and litigation:
2017 executive order to suspend individual mandate penalties; 2019 repeal of the individual mandate penalty under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; Texas v. United States and California v. Texas addressed constitutionality; 2021 California v. Texas (SCOTUS) dismissed challenges while preserving ACA provisions.
Ongoing efforts and innovations:
Association health plans (AHPs) expansion efforts; short-term health plans sourced to bypass some ACA requirements; court rulings in 2019 affected AHP rules; some states limited plans to 3 months.
Health Care Reform in Flux
ACA led to a substantial reduction in the uninsured, especially among low-income individuals who gained Medicaid expansion and private tax credits.
Despite gains, millions remain uninsured; long-term policy direction uncertain.
Post-ACA era saw renewed debates about expanded coverage versus cost containment; political dynamics continued to shape reform prospects.
COVID-19 (starting 2020) imposed new public health priorities and highlighted gaps in coverage and access; ongoing policy considerations focus on expansion, costs, and system resilience.
Conclusion
Over a little more than a century, U.S. health care transformed from a primitive, family-based craft to a technology-driven industry and the largest sector in the economy.
Private and public insurance mechanisms evolved, yet eligibility criteria constrain access for many.
Medicare, Medicaid, and other public programs cover only those who meet criteria; attempts to create universal national health insurance repeatedly failed.
The late 20th and early 21st centuries are characterized by a corporatized health care landscape: large managed care and integrated delivery organizations, with a growing information revolution enabling telecommunication-powered care.
Globalization introduced cross-border care, outsourcing, foreign direct investment, and professional migration, adding both opportunities and ethical questions about resource distribution and equity.
The ACA inaugurated a new era of health care reform, but political, legal, and financial challenges persist; the future direction of U.S. health care remains uncertain and is likely to be shaped by ongoing reforms, technological advances, and evolving values about health care as a social good.