Structural Violence and cultural violence(1) (2)

Structural Violence

  • Definition: Physical and psychological harm resulting from exploitative and unjust social, political, and economic systems.

    • Not necessarily carried out by individuals but is embedded within structures that restrict individual potential.

  • Historical Significance: Introduced by Johan Galtung in 1969; remains a vital theory in understanding violence today.

  • Galtung’s Violence Triangle:

    • Explains the relationship between direct, structural, and cultural violence.

    • Rejects the need for a universal definition, emphasizing important dimensions for research and activism.

Conceptual Foundations

  • Galtung (1969) states that violence is evident when individuals' actual states fall short of their potential states.

    • Illustrations include suffering from diseases like tuberculosis, HIV, and COVID-19 due to systemic failures.

    • Distinction:

      • Indirect Violence (Structural Violence): No specific perpetrator; results from oppressive structures.

      • Direct Violence: Deliberate acts, such as destruction of resources.

  • Example Cases:

    • Institutional racism identified within the Metropolitan Police following the murder of Stephen Lawrence as a form of structural violence.

Social Injustice and Structural Violence

  • Inequalities manifest in resource distribution, education, food security, income, and healthcare.

  • Legislative Dilemma:

    • Accountability in a capitalist structure raises questions about justice and guilt among bystanders.

    • Discussion of if and how the criminal justice system contributes to structural violence.

Upholding Inequality

  • Galtung’s model scrutinizes the interplay of actors (like nations) in preserving structural violence.

    • Different levels of actors exist (territories, organizations, associations).

    • Value exchanges in interactions determine distributions of power and resources, maintaining inequalities.

Mechanisms of Structural Violence

  • Structural conditions can lead to extreme deprivation for lower-ranking actors:

    • Resulting in morbidity, lack of voting power, and bargaining power.

  • Direct violence against these groups becomes justified through structural conditions.

    • Notable historical incidents include the responses to the murders of Stephen Lawrence, Rodney King, and Emmett Till.

Preservation of the Status Quo

  • Those benefiting from structural violence work to maintain existing structures when threatened:

    • Observable behaviors include calling on police or military to suppress disturbances without confronting the structural issues openly.

Towards Social Justice

  • Galtung asserts that peace equals the absence of violence and equates social justice with an egalitarian distribution of power and resources.

Impact of COVID-19 on Structural Violence

  • Wealth disparity highlighted during the pandemic:

    • The ten richest men's wealth soared, starkly contrasting with widespread poverty.

    • Women disproportionately affected in vulnerable sectors and unpaid care, reflecting systemic inequalities.

  • Solutions proposed:

    • Fairer taxation, investments in public services, and ensuring fair wages to reduce inequality.

Violence by Omission

  • Inaction can also constitute an act of violence:

    • Moral implications reflect on responsibility for harm caused by omission.

  • Distinctions in types of inactions:

    • Omitted vs. Omitting.

    • Negative causation vs. negative action.

    • General accountability in violence by omission debated.

Moral Perspectives on Omission

  • Various authors discuss the moral weights of omissions versus actions:

    • Foot: Omissions have moral weight, less serious than acts.

    • Glover: Failure to act can be considered less severe than negative acts.

    • Harris: No moral difference between omissions and actions with identical consequences.

    • Honderich: Ordinary omissions carry significant moral weight.

Group Discussion Points for Criminal Justice System

  • Classification of police, courts, and prisons as actors or structures; exploring their interactions and distributions of power.

  • Examination of who benefits or suffers from existing systems, facilitating social justice or injustice.

Galtung’s Triangle Framework

  • Direct violence, structural violence, and cultural violence each play roles in normalizing aggression:

    • Direct violence is an event response to needs deprivation.

    • Cultural violence legitimizes inevitable structures of oppression.

Cultural Domains of Violence

  • Six domains legitimizing violence:

    • Religion, Ideology, Language, Art, Empirical Science, and Formal Science.

The Continuing Cycle of Violence

  • Cultural violence leads to structural violence, which can elicit direct violence, presenting a vicious cycle.

    • Historical context illustrated through the slave trade's evolution of violence over time.

Final Notes

  • The narrative of violence in society requires constant analysis of underlying structures, cultural norms, and the implications of action versus inaction.