Study Notes on Anti-Oppressive Practice With Communities

Anti-Oppressive Practice With Communities

Key Terminology

  • Community Practice: Refers to the work at the community level, with synonymous terms including community intervention, community organization, and community organizing.

  • Community Organizing vs. Community Organization: Community organizing often seen as a sub-category of community organization within social work, though some community organizers dissociate from social work influences (DeFillipis et al., 2010).

  • Community Intervention/Practice: Preferred term in the context of social work to describe interventions at the community level. This practice lies between micro-level work with individuals/families and macro-level work in movements and policy.

Concept of Community

  • Complex Concept: Community can be perceived in a multitude of ways; often categorized by geography (place) or by interest/identity.

  • Intersectionality: Communities defined by geographic boundaries may also share identity ties. Conversely, identity-based communities may be geographically diverse.

  • Importance of Community: Communities influence daily life, labor markets, and political involvement. They are vital in delivering social services and housing (DeFillipis et al., 2010).

Theoretical Foundations of Community

  • Ferdinand Tönnies: Introduced key terms:

    • Gemeinschaft: Refers to informal, mutual relationships typically found in agrarian societies.

    • Gesellschaft: Concerns formal, bureaucratic relationships seen in industrial societies. These concepts align with Hegel's notions of family-society and civic-society (Weil, 2005a).

  • Historical Shift: Tönnies suggested a societal transition from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft correlating with the shift from agrarian to modern industrial societies.

Community Intervention Models

Rothman's Three Modes of Community Intervention (1968)
  1. Locality Development: Focuses on collective action for community well-being.

    • UN Definition of Community Development: A process for economic and social progress with active community participation.

    • Critique: Locality development may face slow change and co-optation by conservative interests prioritizing privatization.

  2. Social Planning/Policy: Technical in nature, prioritizing detailed assessments for service organization, while less focused on community involvement.

    • Distinction: Social planning involves local efforts, while social policy often has broader implications.

  3. Social Action: Emphasizes structural change and redistributing power/resources for marginalized groups through advocacy tactics.

    • Methods: Includes demonstrations, civil disobedience, and disruptive actions.

Overlapping Models
  • Community practices may incorporate elements from multiple intervention modes.

  • Example: The United Farm Workers combine advocacy with community development practices.

Historical Development of Community Practice

Progressive Era (1900-1920)
  • Features:

    • Focus on social conditions impacting poverty.

    • Integrated approach, serving community and fostering cross-class solidarity.

    • Advocacy for social and political justice.

  • Lugenia Burns Hope and the Atlanta Neighborhood Union: Advocated for community needs through surveys and health services.

Depression Era (1930-1946)
  • Increased radicalism in organizing due to economic failures; pivotal in forming local councils and working with groups like the Communist Party.

  • Saul Alinsky: Influential in labor and community organizing, focusing on local issues.

Civil Rights Era (1960-1975)
  • Expansion of community organizing, ignited by significant social movements (e.g., civil rights, Black Panthers).

  • Black Panther Party: Initiated community programs like schools and free breakfast, challenging systemic inequalities.

Conservative Responses & Shifts in Practice
  • Community work adaptations towards conservative models occurred post-1970s, fueling the growth of community development corporations (CDCs).

  • The emergence of coalitions and conservative groups aimed at countering progressive movements (e.g., ROAR).

Approaches to Community Organizing

  1. Community Inquiry: Engaging community in assessing their conditions leading to informed action. Example: Hull House’s investigations into public health concerns.

  2. Community Mobilization: Facilitating grassroots power through the organization of diverse community members (e.g., Saul Alinsky’s work).

  3. Popular Education: Utilizing community experiences as a knowledge base, prioritizing participatory methods (Freire's influence).

  4. Resilience-Based Organizing: Communities taking control through self-governance and mutual aid.

  5. Cultural Organizing: Integrating arts in community narratives and movements (e.g., creative placemaking).

  6. Participatory Action Approach: Emphasizing community-led data collection and planning (e.g., PRA techniques).

  7. Sustainable Development: Emphasizing social, economic, and environmental health, addressing environmental racism.

    • Definitions:

      • Sustainable Development: Meeting the needs of the present without compromising future generations.

      • Environmental Racism: Racism in environmental policies and their enforcement, targeting communities of color (Chavis, 1994).

  8. Community Asset Mapping: A shift from deficit-focused to asset-based community development practices, identifying strengths within communities.

Guiding Steps for Community Organizers

  1. Identify and build relationships with the community.

  2. Conduct assessments of strengths/challenges via democratic processes.

  3. Develop goals collaboratively.

  4. Analyze strategies collectively.

  5. Plan actionable steps.

  6. Facilitate empowerment efforts throughout the process.

  7. Celebrate successes and reflect on pitfalls.

Contemporary Challenges

  • Capitalist Influences: Neoliberalism has directed community work towards privatized approaches. Anti-oppressive practitioners must navigate these waters to promote justice-based objectives while resisting co-optation of community narratives.

Conclusion

  • Grassroots Organizing Potential: Current socio-political climates present opportunities for grassroots movements to enact real change. Active engagement and discernment in tactics are essential for effective practices.