aphasia reading
Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders
Table 5-2: Scores Attained by Normal Adults on Subtests of the Spatial-Quantitative Battery
**Map Orientation
Age Groups
Under 40: 12.8 SD 1.6 (Lowest Score: 7, Quartiles: 12, 15)
40-49: 12.9 SD 2.0 (Lowest Score: 7)
50-59: 12.7 SD 2.8 (Lowest Score: 2)
60-69: 11.2 SD 3.8 (Lowest Score: 0)
70 and over: 11.2 SD 3.5 (Lowest Score: 2)
Total Average: 12.2 SD 2.9
Introduction to Major Aphasic Syndromes
Language disorders are influenced by anatomical organization in the brain.
Symptoms cluster based on lesion sites, particularly in cerebrovascular cases.
Historical writers of aphasiology generally agree on the major configurations of aphasic symptoms despite varying terminology.
Language abnormalities often reoccur with consistent lesion locations in the presylvian region of the left hemisphere.
Estimates of aphasia classifications vary based on definitions used (30% to 80% classification rate).
Children and individuals with right hemisphere lesions exhibit different symptom patterns compared to adults with classic aphasia.
Description and Classification of Aphasia
Traditional classification links language impairment patterns to lesion sites.
Wernicke's model emphasized auditory comprehension disruption while preserving motor articulation.
Luria's typology focuses on psycholinguistic mechanisms rather than mere anatomy.
Models may be rigid and fail to account for variations in patient recovery and symptom changes.
Interaction of Severity and Fluency
Nonfluency is a key marker for anterior speech zone lesions like Broca's aphasia.
Severity affects fluency, with patients progressing from severe nonfluency to improved articulation over time.
Fluent aphasia characteristics are independent of severity but hinge on existing speech errors.
The Nonfluent Types of Aphasia
Definition of Nonfluent Aphasia: Infrequent production of grammatically coherent utterances.
Symptoms include speech initiation problems and agrammatism.
Case Studies in Nonfluent Aphasia
Illustrations and Speech Samples:
Case 1: Farmer narrative with numerous pauses and limited outputs.
Case 2: Man's morning routine with prevalent agrammatism.
Case 3: Description of cookie theft with disrupted contexts and omission of key details.
Broca's Aphasia
Characterized by nonfluent speech, awkward articulation, grammatical simplicity, and relatively preserved comprehension.
Damage typically occurs in the anterior portion of the speech zone.
Patient examples and ratings show clear limitations in fluency and grammatical structure but preserved comprehension abilities.
Transcortical Motor Aphasia
Related to anterior lesions with preserved repetitive ability but limited spontaneous speech.
Patients often demonstrate improved articulation in structured responses.
Global Aphasia
Severe impairment affects all language aspects, with the potential for stereotypic utterances.
Patients may retain personal relevance comprehension despite general communication disabilities.
Fluent Aphasias Overview
Share characteristics of fluent and grammatically coherent speech with varying paraphasia severity.
Distinct Types of Fluent Aphasias
Wernicke's Aphasia: Impaired comprehension with fluent but often nonsensical speech.
Conduction Aphasia: Disproportionate repetition impairment compared to spontaneous speech; characterized by phonemic paraphasias.
Anomic Aphasia: Prominent word-finding difficulties within fluent speech lacking paraphasias.
Pure Aphasias
Defined by impairments affecting only specific modalities, preserving others.
Alexia with Agraphia
Patients retain intact speech and comprehension but show severe reading and writing deficits due to angular gyrus lesions.
Optic Aphasia
Patients can visually recognize objects but cannot name them, distinguishing it from visual agnosia.
Pure Word Deafness
Loss of auditory comprehension without impacting speech production, reading, or writing capability.
Pure Agraphia
Isolated disruption in writing despite intact speech and comprehension.
Callosal Disconnection Syndromes
Partial isolation allows functional left hemisphere to process stimuli from the right but not vice versa.
Hemioptic Aphasia
Patients cannot name objects seen in the left visual field due to splenium damage but can recognize them through other modalities.