Understand how developmental patterns impact evolutionary history:
Analyze embryonic similarities
Identify atavisms and vestigial structures
Discuss examples of bad design
Recognize how spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression contribute to body form variation.
Explain the concept of deep homology in tool kit genes.
Understand Hox gene structure and their influence on development, including leg development in amphipods.
Charles Darwin: Quote from "The Origin of Species (1859)": "Thus, community in embryonic structure reveals community of descent."
Debate on whether ontogeny (development) recapitulates phylogeny (evolution):
Ernst Haeckel's View: Developmental stages mimic adult evolutionary stages, exemplified in fish, frogs, and birds.
Von Baer's Counterargument: No recapitulation occurs; embryos become increasingly diverse.
Dolphins: Rare occurrences of dolphins being born with hindlimbs illustrate evolutionary vestiges.
Embryonic Similarities: Related embryos show notable similarities (e.g., chickens, possums, cats, bats, humans).
Sea Urchin: Displays radial symmetry in adults and bilateral symmetry in larvae.
Sand Dollar: Shares similarities with sea urchins in both larvae and adult forms.
Human Embryo: Exhibits pharyngeal arches, a tail, and initially appears to have gills.
Whale Development: Fetal whales show hindlimb buds consistent with evolutionary ancestry.
Dolphins: Instances of hindlimb flippers indicate atavistic traits.
Chickens: Mutations leading to alligator-like teeth demonstrate the presence of vestigial structures.
Whales: They retain pelvic bones, which have adapted for copulation.
Kakapo Bird: Exhibits bizarre behavior when frightened despite being flightless.
Koala Pouch: Faces downward, inefficient for an arboreal lifestyle.
Human Laryngeal Nerve: Takes an evolutionary 'roundabout' route to the larynx, affecting various species differently, such as giraffes.
Role of Development: Genetics, inheritance, and natural selection intertwine to draw conclusions about evolutionary processes.
Heterochrony: Variations in the timing of developmental events lead to phenotypic discrepancies.
First identified in Drosophila, Hox genes establish body layout.
Example: Mutations like biothorax in Drosophila illustrate drastic deviations in morphology due to Hox mutations.
Different Hox genes dictate specific structures:
Patterns within Drosophila: Identified genes (e.g., Ant-C, BX-C, Ubx, Abd-A) determine segment fate.
Influence on Crustaceans: Hox genes play crucial roles in leg development across species.
Knockout Experiments showcase the redundancy and interactions between Hox genes, which can lead to morphological changes in crustacean species (e.g., Parhyale).
abd-A Knockout: Results in protruding limbs in segments.
Abd-B Knockout: Shows Hox gene interactions, impacting overall limb configurations.
Triple Knockout of Hox Genes: Demonstrates evolutionary consequences when posterior genes are disabled, allowing anterior genes to dominate in previously inhibited regions.
Studies showed gene parallels across species: eyeless in flies, small eye in mice, and aniridia in humans.
Promiscuous Pax6: Commonality of genetic sequences across diverse species shows evolutionary connections.
Hox genes present in both invertebrates and vertebrates reinforce this homology, showing a shared genetic toolkit across phyla.
Evolution’s Architecture: Evolution functions akin to an architect adapting prior designs to innovate new structures. This principle is encapsulated in the work of scientists such as Jerry Coyne.