Laboring Children

Laboring Children

Overview of Historical Context

  • Lucy Larcom's Experience 1836:

    • Ninth of ten children, started working at a textile mill in Lowell, Massachusetts, at age eleven.

    • Family background: Father was a sea captain who died a year earlier, mother operated a boarding house and struggled to support the family.

    • Motivation: Lucy wanted to support her family to avoid being a burden, so she and her sister applied for mill jobs.

  • Job and Work Environment:

    • Only one job available; Lucy, taller than her sister, got the position.

    • Enjoyed independence and peer companionship initially, with playful activities during work.

    • Duties included changing bobbins and taking breaks for games and stories.

    • Over time, frustration grew:

    • Pay: Received $2 per week.

    • Hours: Worked from 5 AM to 7 PM with only half an hour for breakfast and dinner, six days a week.

    • Conditions: Poor working conditions: windows shut, dim lights, dust-laden air, and noise from machinery.

    • Lack of Education: No educational opportunities; felt the repetitive nature of work was dull and tiresome.

Child Labor and Class Differences in the 19th Century

  • Capitalist expansion:

    • Led to vastly different childhood experiences based on class, ethnicity, and region.

    • Urban Middle Class: Due to rising affluence, children could enjoy a protected childhood, away from labor.

    • Laboring Classes: Children were expected to contribute to family income due to economic demands.

    • Contrasting experiences showcased the drastic differences in childhood across classes.

  • Diverse Experiences:

    • Lai Chow's Experience: Sold by her family in China at age twelve and forced into prostitution in San Francisco.

    • Ann McNabb: Migrated from Ireland to Philadelphia and worked as a live-in cook.

  • Economic Developments:

    • Industrialization created demand for child labor while disrupting rural economies.

    • Massive migration from Europe to urban areas correlated with labor demands, with children expected to participate in family economics.

Child Mortality and Gendered Expectations

  • Child Mortality Rates:

    • By 1895, 18% of children died before age five; mortality highest among poorer families.

    • Affluent families also experienced child mortality, often losing one child in multiple births.

  • Gender Roles:

    • Girls:

    • More likely to be sheltered and involved in housework, earnings usually handed to parents.

    • Limited expectations in terms of independence outside the home.

    • Boys:

    • Encouraged to explore and engage in the outside world, often pursued opportunities beyond family labor.

Educational Disparities

  • Schooling Trends:

    • Enrollment rates varied by class and region; significant increase from 1850 to 1870 in grammar school education.

    • Higher attendance in the Northeast compared to the South, where fewer than half of children attended school by 1890.

    • Rural children faced shorter school years (six months/year) compared to urban students (nine months/year).

  • Differences in Educational Content:

    • Urban students received a standardized curriculum in age-graded classrooms taught by trained educators.

    • Rural students attended ungraded one-room schools staffed by underqualified teachers.

    • Age of leaving school varied significantly by region, with urban middle-class children often remaining in high school until aged sixteen or seventeen, while others entered the workforce at a much younger age.

Play and Leisure Activities

  • Difference in Play:

    • Middle-Class Children:

    • Access to manufactured toys and games designed to teach moral lessons.

    • Engaged in adult-organized clubs and sports activities.

    • Working-Class and Farm Children:

    • Played with homemade toys; engaged in outdoor play often unsupervised.

    • Commercial amusements available (e.g., penny arcades and dance halls) for urban working-class youth.

Economic Dependency and Child Labor

  • Working-Class Families:

    • Children’s earnings pivotal for family survival, often accounting for 20% of family income.

    • Decisions concerning education and work were family-centric rather than individual.

  • Historical Perspectives of Child Labor:

    • Mechanization increased demand for child labor in factories, paving the way for child labor visibility.

    • Early instances of child labor:

    • Samuel Slater's mill in 1790 employed children aged seven to twelve.

  • Child Labor in Domestic Settings:

    • Earlier domestic work diminished as industrial jobs were developed, impacting household economies.

Challenges of Apprenticeship and Skill Building

  • Early Apprenticeship System:

    • Provided youth with vocational skills but the system weakened post-American Revolution due to increased job availability and economic fluctuations.

Migration and Family Instabilities

  • Irish Immigration:

    • Impact of the potato famine led to significant Irish migration to the U.S., resulting in family separations and increased youth responsibilities.

    • Young individuals often entered into domestic work or manual labor.

  • Childhood Experiences:

    • Depot on family dynamics demonstrated by individual stories (e.g., Anne Sullivan, Eugene O’Neill)

    • Family structures transformed with increasing instances of single-parent households.

Conclusion: Shifts in Conceptions of Childhood

  • Emerging Conceptual Frameworks:

    • Useful Childhood: Reflects childhood of labor contributions within family dynamics.

    • Protected Childhood: Aimed at providing children a sheltered experience away from economic obligations, more in line with middle-class ideals.

    • Push for social reforms particularly in the late nineteenth century aimed at child labor laws and compulsory schooling, marking significant shifts in societal structures and perceptions.

Sources

  • Mintz, Steven. Huck's Raft: a History of American Childhood. E-book, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004, https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb06195.0001.001. Downloaded on behalf of University of North Carolina at Asheville