Outline - Pooling - CB
Principles of Risk Management Pooling
Objectives
Ability to define "pooling".
Ability to calculate effects of pooling on risk management decisions.
I. Review/Complete Measurement to This Point
A. Measures of Central Tendency
Represents the "best estimate" of future outcomes.
B. Measures of Dispersion (Risk)
Scenario Analysis: If observations of $0 losses decline by 200, while $200 and $1000 losses rise by 100 each, it suggests an increase in overall risk due to higher expected losses.
If the largest potential loss increases to $100,000 from $10,000, the risk profile becomes more severe, indicating higher potential liability.
C. Definition of Correlation
Understanding the significance of the relationship between two or more variables.
II. Effect of Pooling Uncorrelated Events (Law of Large Numbers)
A. Example Distribution for Individual Automobile Accidents
Outcome (Loss Value) & Probability:
$10,000 (0.05 probability)
$0 (0.95 probability)
Expected Loss Per Individual:
Calculation: (0.05 * $10,000) + (0.95 * $0) = $500.
Standard Deviation Per Individual:
Formula: √(σ²) where σ² = (0.05 * ($10,000 - $500)² + 0.95 * ($0 - $500)²).
B. Impact of Pooling Between Two Individuals
Definition of Pooling: Combining losses and sharing risk.
New Combined Probability Distribution: Outcome and corresponding probability must be calculated for pooled values.
Example: Outcomes might be $20,000 with combined probabilities adjusted accordingly.
Expected Loss When Pooling Two Individuals: Must average individual expected losses.
Standard Deviation When Pooling Two Individuals: Must calculate pooled standard deviations considering correlation (or lack thereof).
C. Impact of Pooling Among Many Individuals
Expected Loss Per Individual: Remains constant despite pooling.
Standard Deviation Per Individual: Declines with increased pooling, indicating risk reduction.
III. Central Limit Theorem
A. Relative Dispersion with Increased Observations
As sample size increases, relative dispersion diminishes (Law of Large Numbers).
B. Distribution Approaching Normality
With more observations, the distribution approximates a Normal Distribution.
IV. Normal Probability Distribution
A. Characteristics
Symmetrical and bell-shaped. Not all symmetrical distributions are Normal.
B. Definition by Mean and Standard Deviation
Mean ± 1 standard deviation covers 68% of distribution.
Mean ± 2 standard deviations covers 95% of distribution.
Mean ± 3 standard deviations covers 99% of distribution.
Example Case: If Amazon's estimated workers’ compensation losses are $750,000 mean and $200,000 standard deviation:
Expected range for 95% observations: $750,000 +/- $400,000 = between $350,000 and $1,150,000.
If adjusting leads to mean of $975,000 with standard deviation of $10,000, the reduction in variability is beneficial, indicating worthwhile change.
C. Benefits of Normal Distribution
Aids in risk assessment and decision-making with reliable estimations.
V. Effects of Correlated Events on Pooling
Understanding how correlations affect risk pooling dynamics and overall risk profile.