Scene by scene analysis
Scene 1
opens with text about the stasi
the text is written in a typewriter font — common motif within film
Wiesler uses a typewriter to write (and fake) reports, Dreyman writes the article on a new typewriter with specific ink, retrieving the typewriter is Wiesler’s riskiest rebellion against the SED’s regime —> motif that symbolises rebellion?
symbolises the idea that writing, and art more broadly as well, is an act of rebellion
the text is about the control and surveillance of the stasi specifically
focus in the film
introduces the idea of surveilance with emphasis on how dangerous and unnerving it can be
sets viewers up to be more opposed to the stasi
provides historical context for the film
allows it to be more rooted in reality
therefore more impactful
sound of boots walking
squeaking of stasi officer’s boots = uneasy feeling, presents him as intimidating + as an opressive figure
stasi officer taking prisoner to be interrogated and tortured
costume: stasi officer = strict uniform, prisoner = regular clothing
presents the stasi as strict, severe, working against the people
green corridor contrasts the red lights and draws attention to them
danger
stasi officer and Wiesler speak in the imperative mood
ordering the prisoner about — strict, authoritative, imposing
shot of the recording device, hands on the seat — MAKES the viewer notice it
cross-cutting between the interrogation and the classroom
uncomfortable juxtaposition
creates an uncomfortable atmosphere — this man’s real interrogation and torture are being used as teaching material
window behind Wiesler
windows=freedom therefore Wiesler is blocking the prisoner from his freedom
second section, window = darker, curtain AND Wiesler between it and the prisoner, which symbolises how he has less chance of being freed
students have neutral expressions, not really reacting despite the fact that they’re listening to a man get tortured —> desensitised
uncomfortable atmosphere for the viewer — feels unsettling + like a juxtaposition to see people react so little to torture, especially teenagers
creates the idea that there is always someone listening in in the GDR — even when the stasi are interrogating you
when someone does speak up against it, Wiesler puts a cross by his name
instantly taken out of consideration for becoming a stasi officer — shows how strict they are
shows more widely how strict the whole regime was against those who opposed them
Wiesler speaks definitively — “will”
experience
certainty
unwavering in his loyalty to the stasi and his work
emphasis placed on the odor samples
highlights the lengths the stasi went to
Grubitz implies that Wiesler helped him get good grades in school
foreshadows Wiesler being by-the-book and a genuine believer in communism vs Grubitz being corrupt and only there for the power and authority
Scene 2
title ‘the lives of others’ shown just before scene in the theatre w/ Dreyman + CMS’s introductions
presents them, and artists generally, as the ‘others’
suggests are the antithesis of the stasi + the DDR regime — free, creative, loving, etc. — and therefore they are the ones who can effectively rebel against the regime’s control
links back to typewriter symbolism — art as rebellion?
Dreyman introduced with aplause
“Helden des Regimes”
before he begins rebelling — reflect how the GDR only treated its citizens well when they conformed to the regime
presents him as the hero in contrast to Wiesler
Wiesler watches Dreyman during the play
not appreciating art —> sets up his change, which is partially due to reading the thing by Brecht and listening to the Sonata
suspicious of Dreyman despite Grubtz’s assurance that he’s loyal
presents him as someone whos a bit paranoid out of loyalty
suspicious of everyone — microcosm for the regime?
‘Schild und Schwert’
shield is first to present the stasi as defending/protecting the people
Grubitz says that Dreyman could be disloyal to the regime despite what he said to Wiesler
trying to get Hempf to think he is diligent?
“that is why you and me are on top” —> wants Hempf to give him a promotion basically
shows his corruption and powerhungriness
calls back to him saying that Wiesler helped him get good grades
Hempf describes Hauser as '“dubios” and tells Grubitz to watch out for him at the party — introduces the audience to how Hauser rebels much more vocally than Dreyman especially at the beginning
“Maßnahmen A und B” of bugging the room
code words — know what each other are talking about, but eavesdroppers won’t
level of secrecy in the stasi
Grubitz calls Hempf “Genauso Minister” despite obvious power imbalance
corrupt government with power hungry officials rather than true communism
Scene 3
Dreyman + Christa dancing — conveys intimacy of their relationship
party with live music, fancy clothes and jewellery etc. wasn’t something many GDR citizens were able to do
the artists are not just ‘others’ to Wiesler but to the average GDR citizen as well
Hempf can’t remember which “große Sozialist” he is quoting
not truly dedicated to the ideology
Hempf is predatory towards Christa
presents his corruption and lack of morals
Dreyman sticks up for Jerska about his blacklisting and Hempf says “So gibt das gar nicht bei uns” and “Sollten vorsichtiger ihren Wort wählen” (?)
implying to Dreyman that he shouldn’t suggest anything negative about the regime
Dreyman’s plays have ‘a belief that people can change’
this sets up the idea of the whole film — Wiesler changing morally
creates irony, as Hempf is describing them as such when Wiesler (and Dreyman) changes to rebel against the regime that he is part of
Scene 4
Grubitz ordering Wiesler around, despite the fact it was Wiesler’s idea to survey Dreyman in the first place
Wiesler’s apartment is pretty empty, grey curtains, basic furtiture, not much decoration, etc.
following the regime
contrasts with Dreyman’s apartment which we later see is cluttered, bright, has plants, etc.
Wiesler doesn’t have love, art, passion, joy, etc. in his life
Scene 5
Dreyman playing football in the road
lighthearted, fun etc. person
contrast w/ Wiesler
Wiesler watching, taking notes
diligence
possibly noting timings of Dreyman’s day?
suspicious of EVERYTHING
costume: Dreyman=fairly casual, shirt with no tie, open coat vs. Wiesler=uniform, jacket buttoned to the top, straight lines
Scene 6
go in IMMEDIATELY after Dreyman leaves
precise tool to open lock
one after the other
no dialogue (apart from “20 Minuten”)
tense, building music
gloves
different types of bugging, shows specific methods
electronic sound effects
^all work to present the lengths that the stasi would go to in order to spy on GDR citizens
microcosm for the regime controlling every part of everyday life?
Dreyman has a big window with a lot of light coming through
Wiesler walks from one side of the room to the other
by coming into Dreyman’s home and bugging it, he is taking away Dreyman’s freedom
however he then stops obstructing Dreyman’s freedom by faking reports (symbolised by him walking out of the way of the window)
Wiesler notices Frau Meinicke in the window
shows how much he notices/extent of suspicion
knows about her daughter — researched whole building
Scene 7
lots of shouting at Jerska’s
unrest — creates a tense atmosphere for the audience
books all around
wise + knowledgeable?
Jerska says that writers like Dreyman can write about whatever they want
foreshadows Dreyman writing an article agaisnt the regime, perhaps the moment that inspired him to do so
a director who can’t direct “hat gar nichts mehr”
reflects Jerskas hopelessness and depression, which lead to his suicide
Dreyman lies to Jerska to give him more hope
presents him as a kind person
Scene 8
room starts in the dark, then Wiesler turns on the lights
reflects him figuratively going from ‘being in the dark’ about Dreyman’s loyalty to knowing because of him bugging the appartment
contrast between surveilance room=silence, Dreyman’s apartment=music
decorations, clothes etc. = celabratory atmosphere
asking Frau Meinecke if she can keep a secret
creates irony as she is keeping the secret of the bugging of the apartment from Dreyman
her fear of her daughter losing her uni place is evident
reflects that people were terrified of what the stasi could do to them
Christa waits for Dreyman to leave before taking the pill
Scene 9
opens with loud guitar music
contrasts the silence of Christa’s loneliness
creates a celabratory, fun, lively atmosphere
Jerska sent people away from him
self isolation
reflects his depression
Wiesler is in the centre of the frame
seems unnatural in contrast to shots of the party with characters off centre and/or with camera movement
reflects the fact that he is an outsider in their life, listening in but not truly part of it
unnatural
creates a feeling of order and strictness
particularly in opposition to the freedom/liveliness of the artists
Hauser trying to provoke the new director
Hauser and Dreyman on opposite sides of the frame — opposing views on the situation
they both know (or suspect at least) that the director has stasi affiliations
Hauser will outwardly talk about it, whereas Dreyman says that they don’t “know” — he is willing to decidedly be ignorant in order to not offend the SED and end up in the same position as Jerska
“Irgendwann musst du Position beziehen oder bist du kein Mensch”
Similar to when Dreyman asks if anyone who listened to the sonata could be a bad person
clearly lays out the differences in Dreyman and Hauser’s approaches; Hauser is vocal about what he opposes whereas Dreyman is willing to go along with things then oppose in private
this allows for Dreyman to change alongside Wiesler (Nebenwandlung) and outwardly act against the regime
music is muffled when the camera is on Wiesler
diegetic — through his headphones
further presents him as an outsider to the artists’ lives
Scene 10
abundance of gifts
conveys to the audience how popular Dreyman is
it contrasts how little there was in Wiesler’s apartment, which in turn emphasises Wiesler’s lack of personal connections (outside of Grubitz who he isn’t exactly friends with)
Dreyman gets the sheet music for the sonata
he casts it aside and kisses Christa, which could represent how he is not yet ready to act against the regime
Dreyman and Christa’s intimacy and the soft music is contrasted with the harshness of the sound of Wiesler’s typewriter
Scene 11
Wiesler wants to sit with the regular employees however Grubitz wants to sit with the bosses
“Irgendwo muss der Sozialismus doch beginn” —> highlights the fact that Wiesler is part of the stasi out of belief in socialism, whereas Grubitz is there out of a desire for power
Grubitz says that Wiesler can’t monitor higher ministers
he (and the system technically) is allowing Hempf (and other high up ministers) to act in an immoral way without consequences
this reflects the corruption of the whole system, and also of Grubitz personally
the main reason he isn’t allowing Wiesler to report negatively about Hempf is because he is technically in charge of the operation, so he would get in trouble for it
‘one rule for me, another rule for thee’
reminds me of when they start changing the rules in animal farm
Wiesler questions Grubitz, implying that he disagrees with his viewpoint
shows he is starting to lose faith in the party due to its corruption
Grubitz is demotes a man for making a joke about Germany’s political situation
we see him at the end with Wiesler and other employees who presumably ‘betrayed the regime’ or ‘derided the part'y’
he is presented as a bully, and intimidates the man by switching his tone immediately and ruining his whole career
he then makes a joke of his own which (in my interpretation) is directly critical of Honecker, yet he receives no punishment and even people from other tables laugh
this further presents the party’s corruption even reaches jokes
lower employees aren’t allowed to make jokes that tow the line of criticism without punishment whereas higher up employees can without facing any backlash
‘one rule for me, another rule for thee’
Scene 12
cuts between Dreyman and Wiesler both writing
draws visual parralels between them
perhaps to reflect that they will change alongside each other throughout the course of the film
reveals Wiesler drawing floorplan
Christa ignores Hempf, but he keeps following and talking to her
this shows how much of a predator he is
he refuses to take no for an answer
this can further be seen when she sits still as he is talking to her and assaulting her, as she doesn’t consent
the driver looks at them through the rear view mirror then looks away
this shows him turning a blind eye to Hempfs horrible actions, which we have already seen from Grubitz
this reflects the party’s corruption and how people with a lot of power are allowed to get away with doing bad things, both in the period that the film is set in and in the present day
Wiesler hacks the doorbell, which leads to Dreyman seeing Christa in Hempf’s car
could be in order to counter what Grubitz told him about not being allowed to monitor Hempf
could also be because he wants to see how Dreyman reacts
CMS showers
trying to clean herself of Hempf
Scene 13
Scene 14
Scene 15
Christa says that Hauser isn’t allowed to travel to the west for his lectures
the audience can see, as they could with Jerska and the employee who made a joke, that acting against the regime gets people punished
Dreyman calls Hauser “arrogant”, mirroring what Wiesler said in the first scene, when he told his students that people rebelling against the regime were often arrogant
nighttime watcher is eating on the job, leaned back in chair etc.
not as diligent as Wiesler
Scene 15
Wiesler reads Brecht
he stole the book from Dreyman
it is probably his first time encountering West German literature
Dreyman dictates the piece (?), which reflects how insight into Dreyman’s life is helping Wiesler to change as a person
Scene 16
Wiesler reacts to Jerska’s suicide alongside Dreyman
shows how invested in the artist’s lives he is
Dreyman is crestfallen — he can now feel the full effect of the regime as it lead to the death of his friend
arc shot of Wiesler listening to the sonata
Lenin quote
inspired film
Scene 17
parallels other scene of Wiesler in the elavator
elavators=transient, liminal
they go between places
placing the scene in an elevator could be in order to symbolise his change
first time Wiesler takes action against the regime/what he should be doing as a stasi officer
Scene 18
Scene 19
Grubitz banned Hauser from the cultural conference just to provoke Dreyman
this is because he is desperate to find him due to pressure from Hempf
demonstrates how he is willing to penalise people just to gain power
Scene 20
Dreyman asks Christa to not go to Hempf
“Du brauchst ihn nicht”
Christa asks “Brauchte ich ihn nicht?”
she forces Dreyman to confront his inaction and how he goes along with the regime to be able to do what he wants
builds up to him writing the suicide article in opposition to the regime
Wiesler does not write what they are saying
he even holds onto the headphones so that the next observer can’t hear them
he is now actively protecting Dreyman and CMS, even lying about where CMS is going
just as Dreyman says that he wants to change, we can see that Wiesler has also changed
die Nebenwandlung
after leaving, Wiesler stands outside of the door for a moment
his expression conveys that he is way out of his depth and is questioning a lot about himself right now
he can’t stop looking at the building while he is walking
worried/scared over the consequences of his actions
Scene 21
Wiesler subtly encourages CMS to stop seeing Hempf and to listen to Dreyman
“viele Menschen lieben Sie, weil Sie sind wie Sie sind”
“viele Menschen” i.e. Dreyman and her friends, who would stand by her
CMS takes of sunglasses
no longer hiding? decided to go back to Dreyman
Scene 22
article read through voiceover over the funeral
emphasises how real and personal the article is for Dreyman
Jerska was blacklisted for speaking up against the regime
Dreyman is doing the same in his memory — keeping his ideas/spirit alive?
Dreyman ends the v/o saying he wants to talk about Jerska
it is fairly safe to assume that he goes on to talk about how Jerska was banned from directing over one comment, which drove him to suicide
this would be quite a big change in Dreyman’s character, as he used to be afraid of speaking out because he would lose his job
Scene 23
Dreyman says he and Hauser can meet in his apartment since Hauser’s is bugged
this creates dramatic irony as we the audience know that Wiesler has been listening in on Dreyman for some time now
They arrange to meet at the Soviet war memorial
Scene 24
they don’t say what the article is about out loud
shows how fearful they are of the stasi listening
further creates dramatic irony as we know that Wiesler has been not only listening in on them but also covering up Dreyman encouraging Christa to not see Hempf
shows how pervasive the stasi were and how they listened in everywhere, even at a war memorial
“meine Wohnung ist sauber, ich sage so”
no it isn’t
Scene 25
we see Wiesler caught between helping Dreyman and doing his job
calls Dreyman “mein Freund”
he has never met Dreyman, so the fact he sees him as a friend shows how invested in his life he has become as a result of the surveilance
it also shows how he has no real connections really
Scene 26
Wiesler begins the lie of the anniversary play
Dreyman gets new typewriter
symbolism for rebelling
champagne cork hits the bugging
this causes a loud noise in Wiesler’s headphones
symbolises how fancy drinks and parties weren’t permitted?
symbolises how Wiesler is torn between helping them and reporting on them as a member of the Stasi?
symbolises how Wiesler is risking his job by helping them?
emphasises how ignorant they are of the fact that they are being surveyed
Scene 27
Wiesler unzips his jacket
his costume symbolised uniformity, conformity, authority and strictness
unzipping it shows him moving away from the stasi and rebelling
it becomes more similar to Dreyman’s open coats/jackets
Grubitz is in uniform
lots of badges/medals/awards on jacket
represents how powerful he is now
Grubitz talks about the specific ways to punish ‘subversive artists’
this makes Wiesler fearful for Dreyman
it shows how intricately the stasi/SED/regime plan how to punish people, emphasising their villainy
he says ‘without any force’ while talking about imprisoning and isolating people (which is torture)
shows how desensitised he is; he doesn’t care about how it affects people as long as he stays in power
“Projekte geht es nicht um Noten, sondern Erfolg”
sums up the differences between Grubitz and Wiesler well; Wiesler was reporting on people for the stasi out of actual suspision whereas Grubitz was there to be successful and gain status
reflects the corruption of the stasi: push factor for Wiesler’s self-rescue
Scene 28
cross cutting between shots with similar camera movement of Wiesler and Dreyman
arc shots —> they have both reached major turning points in their lives
draws parallels between them — both of them have become braver in their rebellion
red ink fingerprint on the article
fingerprints are unique per person so if it was found Dreyman could easily be caught
shows how trusting he is that the apartment isn’t bugged
represents the idea that art is intrinsically linked to it’s artist
he made the article because he had something he wanted to say, therefore no matter if he uses a fake name or not, the article will always reflect a part of him
Christa catches him hiding the typewriter
he is hiding secrets from her, just like how she hid things from him
news report of the article
Scene 29
graphologist/typewriter expert
shows the extent the stasi will go to to find who they are after
he knows off the top of his head the exact model of Hauser’s typewriter
shows how much of Hauser’s life they infiltrated because his views conflicted with their party’s interests
Scene 30
Hempf using his leverage against Christa when she stops doing what he wants
shows how corrupt the government is as they will collect information as you so the second you act out of allignment with how they want you to act, they ruin you
Scene 31
we see that Grubitz has taken the choice of ruining Christa
this shows that he has no morals and will destroy someone’s life just to gain the favour of higher ups
Scene 32
Grubitz asks Christa what actors do when they can’t act
mirrors Jerska asking Dreyman what directors do when they can’t direct
foreshadows Christa’s suicide?
Scene 33
aren’t careful with Dreyman’s things
not very shield
the stasi officer puts down the West German book when he finds out it was from Margot Honecker
shows him trying to appeal to power — corruption
Grubitz speaks to Wiesler in a less personal way than towards the beginning of the film
they have grown apart, as Grubitz has become more powerhungry and Wiesler has become more rebellious
Scene 34
Dreyman still trusts CMS
just like how he trusts that his apartment isn’t bugged
FATAL FLAW
Scene 35
Wiesler sits in the suspect’s chair
reflects Grubitz’s suspicions of him
reflects how he too is a ‘traitor of the regime’ like CMS and Dreyman
reflects how Grubitz etc. use there power over him to get what they want just like they do with CMS and the other artists
Scene 36
when Wiesler and Grubitz are talking, they are on opposite sides of the frame and visibly theres kind of a line between them
they are on different sides now; Wiesler is no longer working with the stasi
“Bist du noch an der richtigen Seite?”
both have different views on what the ‘right side’ is
Wiesler answers “Ja” because he IS on the right side, just not the side that Grubitz means
Wiesler is fully commiting to his rebellion against the regime
he turns around to show CMS he is the man from the pub
he wants her to trust that he is on her side, and will try to help her
she looks away from him
she feels ashamed, because after meeting him she tried to be true to herself and stop seeing Hempf, and stay with Dreyman, but now she has betrayed Dreyman for her own safety
he tells her to save herself
he is trying to tell her that he will help clear Dreyman’s name, but in a way that Grubitz cannot detect
double meanings are laced throughout the scene — but does Christa interpret them as Wiesler intends?
‘Dreyman wird nie etwas erfahren’ — foreshadows how Dreyman only finds out about the spying at the end?
Wiesler can sketch out the floorplan from memory
shows his diligence as a stasi officer
Scene 37
Wiesler is hiding behind the door as Dreyman goes through
the audience can start to piece together what he has done
reflects how his spying has gone unnoticed the whole time — protecting Dreyman from out of sight
Christa showers when she gets back
mirrors when she got back after seeing Hempf
trying to wash away what happened
Christa looks out onto the road
she sees that a car is coming before she goes
Scene 38
Scene 39
Scene 40
Scene 41 (?)
red ink fingerprint]
parrallels Dreyman earlier in the film
similarly, Wiesler is intrinsically linked with the rebellion against the regime, even if no-one knew
Scene 42
Scene 43