Lecture Notes: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Contact Information:

  • Email: matt.roser@plymouth.ac.uk

  • Office: PSQ B207

  • Office appointment times:

    • Tuesday 10-11am

    • Thursday 10-11am

  • Check in code: XX-XX-XX

  • Dr Matt Roser

Lecture 1 Part 2: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Reading Material:

  • Baars, B., & Gage, N. M. (2013). Fundamentals of cognitive neuroscience: a beginner's guide. Academic Press. Chapter 3.

  • Savoy, R. (2001). History and future direction of human brain mapping and functional neuroimaging. Acta Psychologica, 107, 9-42.

  • Ward, J. The student's guide to cognitive neuroscience. Chapter 4.

  • Note: Slide 7 contains an image of open brain surgery.

Web Resources

  • Animation 2.1: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    • SLMENS

    • MRI animations with narration

    • http://sites.sinauer.com/cogneuro2e/animations02.01.html

  • fMRI for Newbies (from which I've grabbed images)

    • http://www.fmri4newbies.com/

The Essential Question

  • What do those blobs represent in fMRI images?

Historical Images of the Brain and Mind

  • Brain Structure:

    • Some images are still in use today.

    • Often interpretive and require labor/skill.

    • Examples:

      • Christopher Wren (1664).

      • Brodmann cytoarchitecture maps.

  • Brain function: *Phrenology (19thC)

    • Electrophysiological mapping 1957

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Physics

  • Uses a magnetic field (B_0) and radio energy to produce an image.

  • A large magnet (50,000 times Earth's magnetic field) aligns nuclei that have a net magnetic moment (from odd number of protons/neutrons), e.g., H_2O.

  • Nuclei absorb and re-emit radio frequency energy.

How is an Image Acquired?

  • Nuclei spin around the main magnetic field.

  • RF pulse (oscillating magnetic field) tips M out of alignment with B_0 and synchronizes the phase of spins.

  • M gradually returns to alignment, and spins lose phase coherence.

  • These changes are detected as the ‘MRI signal’.

  • Spins oriented with or against B_0.

  • M = net magnetization.

  • M deflected by RF pulse.

  • M Applied Magnetic Field (B_0).

Mapping Lesions

  • A new extension of an older technique for mapping structure to function.

  • Images make complex patterns of data intelligible.

  • Imaging the Structure of the Brain.

Mapping Normal Variability in Structure

  • Map second-order structure, such as sulcal asymmetry.

  • Colour-coded maps for statistical significance of gyral/sulcal variability.

  • Large numbers of neurologically-normal participants.

  • Thompson, P. M. et al. (1998). Cereb. Cortex, 8, 492–509.

Mapping Change Over Time

  • Examples:

    • grey matter volume.

    • commissural myelination.

    • Myelination by age (mths).

    • Grey-matter development.

Functional MRI (fMRI)

  • Brain Mapping Publications: an exponential rise.

  • References to journals and abstracts related to brain mapping, illustrating the growth in the field.

The Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) Response – the basis of fMRI

  • Relative levels of de/oxyhaemoglobin change from regional cortical activity.

  • Momentary decrease in blood oxygenation immediately after neural activity increases, known as the “initial dip” in the haemodynamic response function (HRF).

  • Followed by a period where the blood flow increases to a level which overcompensates for the increased demand.

  • Regional blood oxygenation actually increases following neural activation.

  • The blood flow peaks after around 6 seconds and then falls back to baseline, often accompanied by a “post-stimulus undershoot”.

De/oxyhaemoglobin and Magnetic Properties

  • De/oxyhaemoglobin have different magnetic properties.

  • Local field strength is affected by relative levels.

  • This affects the local signal in the image.

  • Increased signal is obtained from ‘active’ regions.

  • Take Home Points:

    • It’s complicated!!!

    • Change to the image is far removed from neural events.

An fMRI Experiment

  • Components:

    • Magnet

    • Video projector

    • Video screen

    • Gradient coil

    • Radio-frequency coil

    • Prism glasses

    • Headphones

    • Radio-frequency amplifier

    • Button response box

    • Amplifiers control magnetic field in three dimensions

    • Stimulus control computer

    • Spectrometer control computer

fMRI – Experimental Logic: Cognitive Subtraction

  • Originated with reaction time experiments (F. C. Donders, a Dutch physiologist).

  • Measure the time for a process to occur by comparing two reaction times, one which has the same components as the other + the process of interest.

  • Assumption of pure insertion: Can insert a component process into a task without disrupting the other components.

  • Task difficulty (a confound) may differ between conditions, resulting in changed attention.

  • Examples:

    • T1: Hit a button when you see a light.

    • T2: Hit a button when the light is green but not red.

    • T3: Hit the left button when the light is green and the right button when the light is red.

    • T2 – T1 = time to make discrimination between light color.

    • T3 – T2 = time to make a decision.

Experimental Design 1: Block Design fMRI

  • Alternating blocks of task and rest.

  • Example: 30s Task, 30s Rest.

Experimental Design 2: Event-Related fMRI

  • Allows (pseudo)random presentation of stimuli.

  • Allows retrospective coding of events (e.g., memory experiments).

  • Event-related design with Condition 1 Event and Condition 2 Event.

fMRI Preprocessing and Analysis

  • Steps:

    • Build Model

    • Realignment & motion correction

    • Smoothing

    • Normalisation

    • Image Data

    • Anatomical Reference

    • Parameter Estimation

    • Kernel Data

    • Design Matrix

    • Statistical Parametric Mapping

    • Contrasts

  • It's complicated!!!

Analysis - Modelling the data fMRI signal (data)

  • Block model convolved with HRF

  • We regress our model of our experiment against the signal-change data.

  • Least-squares best-fit analysis of the data that best estimates the amplitudes of the predictors (minimize residuals).

  • A T-test tests whether the slope of the function differs from 0 (i.e. flat).

Data Analysis at Every Voxel

  • This analysis is done independently at every voxel (3D pixel/volume) - i.e. thousands of times!

  • Contrasts allow one to test for voxels where activation in one condition is greater than another.

  • Voxels with significant T statistics can then be coloured in according to the size of T.

  • The essential question – what do those blobs represent?

Interpreting Blobs

  • Blobs are clusters of significant statistics for either a main effect or a contrast between two sets of regressors at each voxel.

  • Shows areas where the signal change was significantly predicted by the model (or where the degree of prediction differed between contrasted conditions).

  • Importantly…! This is the end result after much preprocessing and analysis.

  • Change in the signal is due to regional hemodynamics.

  • Thus, activations are distantly related to the underlying neurological events.

What has functional brain imaging told us?

  • Identified functional areas – e.g. Fusiform face area – stimuli; Anterior Cingulate - attention.

  • Corroborated findings from other methods (e.g. hippocampal involvement in memory).

  • Allowed the localization of function from undamaged brains.

  • Meta-analyses bring some order to the flood of data, but are these maps from multiple different studies any more useful than the 1957 electrophysiology map (slide 10)?

  • Cabeza & Nyberg. (2001). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:1, pp. 1–47.

New Directions in fMRI

  • Functional-connectivity analyses: calculate correlations between activations in different areas.

  • Dynamic causal modelling: explicit models of distributed networks are tested to see which best fits the observed data.

  • Both these techniques investigate distributed processing and overcome some of the limitations of lesion studies and earlier fMRI studies.

    • Functional-connectivity analysis.

    • Dynamic causal model.