Ethics in Speech-Language Pathology – Study Notes

Attendance and Session Overview

  • Instructor notes that students should log attendance and that today’s session focuses on ethics with a collaborative learning activity coming later in the session. No graded submission is required today; group work and discussion only.

  • Reflections are weekly but are not submitted yet. The first submission of reflections (for weeks 1177) will occur in week 88 along with other class submissions beyond the syllabus acknowledgment.

  • No quiz or formal assessment for today; purpose is preparation for collaborative activity.

Preparation and Resources for Today

  • Pre-reading task: read the ASHA Code of Ethics to prepare for the collaborative activity. The instructor emphasizes you do not need to memorize all details; know where to find accurate information when needed.

  • Practical tip: save/download the ASHA Code of Ethics and keep it accessible; the instructor keeps a copy on the bulletin board to reference in cases of potential ethical issues. This emphasizes the importance of accessibility to the document.

  • Where to find documents: resources section in Canvas, under Seminar Resources, which links to Google Drive containing the relevant documents.

  • Rationale: ethics topics can affect licensure and professional credentials; a single egregious violation can jeopardize credentials and career prospects.

Core Ethical Concepts and Sanctions (Overview)

  • Ethical violations can trigger sanctions from ASHA and/or state licensure boards; it’s important to verify information rather than rely on informal advice.

  • Guarding your professional investment is essential: it takes time, money, and credibility to maintain licensure and credentials.

  • The aim of ethics discussions is to protect clients, uphold the integrity of the profession, and maintain public trust.

  • The ethics discussion connects to broader professional expectations: presentations, publications, and avoiding behaviors that would harm reputation.

Confidentiality, Social Media, and Representation of Credentials

  • Social media risks:

    • Breach of client confidentiality if client details or identifiable information are posted (e.g., discussing a client’s behavior or family details). This could reveal the client’s identity and violate confidentiality.

    • Misrepresentation of credentials or expertise: claiming CCCs or other credentials before officially receiving them from ASHA is considered misrepresentation.

    • Defamation: avoid posting negative statements about colleagues or clients; once posted, content can be screenshotted or shared widely and cannot be fully controlled.

  • Practical guidance:

    • Do not post about clients or coworkers in a way that could identify them.

    • Do not present yourself as a credentialed clinician if you have not yet obtained the credential (e.g., “CCC” before official notification from ASHA).

    • If you need to vent or express concerns, write it privately and delete it; avoid public posting.

  • Real-world example discussed: social media misuse could lead to ethical violations and enforcement actions.

Documentation, Billing, and Practice Management Ethics

  • Documentation lapses are a common ethical risk: failing to document progress, data, and IEP outcomes can constitute ethical violations.

  • Billing for services not rendered is both unethical and illegal; ensure that billing reflects actual services provided and accurate documentation.

  • Data and progress notes: ensure accurate data (e.g., progress percentages) and avoid fabricating or altering records; a snowball effect can occur if data are not kept up-to-date.

  • Reimbursement and productivity expectations: some settings have productivity requirements; failure to meet these could result in adverse outcomes, including terminations.

  • Client abandonment: leaving a client without ensuring continuity of care or providing referrals and a discharge plan constitutes client abandonment; document referrals and provide a handoff list or home program when possible.

  • Continuity of services: when resigning or moving, provide a referral list and, if possible, a transition plan to maintain service continuity; document communications and obtain client acknowledgment of discharge materials.

  • Documentation practices when leaving a caseload: keep copies of documents (two copies of important communications) and retain electronic copies for several years.

  • Ethical implications: billing for non-rendered services and inaccurate discharge documentation undermines clinical integrity and can trigger sanctions.

Supervision, Mentoring, and Credentialing

  • Supervision: some SLPs may under-supervise CFs, SLPAs, or graduate students; supervision is an educational process and should not be treated as free labor.

  • Fellowship and mentoring: these processes have ethical expectations and supervisory requirements; ensure proper oversight and compliance with standards.

  • Credentialing clarity: ASHA credentials (e.g., CCC) are earned, not assumed; do not advertise or practice under credentials you have not been officially granted.

  • Licensure timing: you must await official notification of licensure or credential grant before practicing under those credentials; do not begin working based on mere application status.

  • Ethical implications: misrepresenting credentials can lead to sanctions and harm professional reputation.

Self-Reporting and Disclosure

  • Self-reporting requirement: if you have a felony, misdemeanor, or disciplinary action by another board, you must self-report to ASHA and/or state boards.

  • Consequences of failing to self-report: ASHA can discover through platforms that list licensure boards; failure to disclose can result in sanctions.

  • Illustration: a driver’s license-related issue (e.g., speeding) may or may not require self-disclosure depending on severity; more serious offenses (e.g., reckless driving) could require disclosure if they pertain to professional duties.

  • Practical advice: be transparent about issues, as self-disclosure can mitigate consequences; do not try to hide information.

  • Example discussed: a participant’s speeding could have required self-disclosure depending on jurisdiction and circumstances; the instructor emphasizes caution and honesty.

Ethical Decision-Making Model (ASHA-aligned)

  • Core idea: use a structured, common-sense approach to resolve ethical dilemmas.

  • Steps highlighted in the discussion (10-step process mentioned):

    • 11. Identify the problem or dilemma

    • 22. Determine the issues involved

    • 33. Review relevant ethical guidelines (ASHA Code of Ethics, state licensure rules)

    • 44. Consult with others while maintaining confidentiality (avoid sharing identifiable information)

    • 55. Use your gut reaction/check internal sense that something is wrong

    • 66. Consider possible courses of action

    • 77. Consider consequences of each course of action

    • 88. Make a decision

    • 99. Implement the decision

    • 1010. Evaluate the outcome

  • Practical note: ASHA’s Board of Ethics is not a legal body; they assess ethical issues and can refer matters to licensure boards or prosecutors when appropriate.

  • The aim is to protect the public and maintain the integrity of the profession; decisions should be guided by both ethical guidelines and practical consequences.

ASHA Board of Ethics Decisions and Sanctions (Overview)

  • Purpose of sanctions: to educate, protect the public, and inform others about professional conduct and accountability.

  • Public perception: disciplinary actions can impact professional opportunities, including private practice prospects; reputation is critical in the field.

  • Sanction types (from ASHA Board of Ethics):

    • Reprimand (private): confidential; disclosed only to board members, complainant, and respondent.

    • Censure: public disclosure in professional communications (e.g., ASHA Leader magazine); name and sanction publicly noted.

    • Suspension: temporary loss of credential; eligibility to practice may be limited during the suspension period; re-entry requires meeting conditions and dues.

    • Revocation: permanent loss of credential; typically a lifetime loss of certification.

    • Withholding: denies credentialing or certification intake; used for students or applicants with unresolved issues; discretion based on context.

    • Cease and Desist: if misrepresentation or uncredentialed practice occurs, ASHA can demand stopping the activity.

  • Jurisdiction and overlap: ASHA decisions can influence state boards; some cases may escalate to the Attorney General depending on the severity and nature of the violation.

  • Public awareness: some sanctions become visible in public-facing publications (e.g., ASHA Leader) or licensure board releases.

Examples of Board Decisions and Sanctions (Illustrative Cases)

  • Billing for services not performed: a case where 22 therapy sessions were billed but not provided; sanctions and membership consequences reported by state board.

  • Inappropriate client contact: conversations with a client that violated confidentiality; link to public decisions.

  • Medicaid overbilling: a clinician billed Medicaid for services provided to many recipients beyond reason; heavy penalties likely including loss of credential or long-term suspension.

  • Client abandonment: leaving a client without proper discharge documentation or referral; sanctions may include revocation or long-term suspension depending on severity and documentation.

  • Theft or fraud in billing: cases involving falsified documentation, forged signatures, and obtaining fees by fraud; severe sanctions including potential revocation.

  • Impaired practitioner: cases involving health or mental health impairments that affect clinical duties; corrective action and sanctions pursued.

  • One-session billing case (Virginia example): a practitioner billed one session that was not provided and submitted false discharge paperwork; highlighted as a particularly shocking example due to intentionality and documentation falsification; demonstrates the importance of accurate record-keeping and the serious risk of sanctions.

  • Takeaway: even single cases of incorrect billing or falsified records can lead to significant sanctions; emphasize meticulous documentation and audit trails, and proactively correct mistakes when discovered.

Group Collaborative Learning Activity (Today)

  • Structure: 6 groups; each group handles one scenario (Scenarios 1–6) during the session.

  • Time: approximately twenty minutes total for the activity; the instructor will announce with about five minutes left.

  • Deliverables (for the full group):

    • Summarize the scenario

    • Identify the ethical issues present

    • State what code or guideline was violated (don’t need to list specific principle numbers, but describe the violation such as “documentation lapse,” “client abandonment,” etc.)

    • Propose appropriate sanctions or disciplinary actions

  • Notes: there are no formal submissions; this is a discussion activity to develop ethical reasoning and decision-making skills.

  • Logistics: if a student cannot access a room, the instructor will add them; the activity includes a short debrief after returning to the full group.

Practical Guidance and Takeaways for Ethical Practice

  • Always verify information—don’t rely on informal advice; fact-check using official documents (ASHA Code of Ethics, state boards).

  • Maintain confidentiality in all forms of communication; avoid posting patient-specific information on social media.

  • Be precise in documentation and billing; ensure data, progress notes, and discharge statements are accurate and timely.

  • Proactively manage supervision and mentoring responsibilities; respect the educational nature of supervision and avoid treating it as free labor.

  • Self-report potential issues timely; ensure all relevant disclosures are made to ASHA and appropriate licensure boards.

  • Preserve client continuity of care during transitions; provide referrals and a clear discharge plan with documented communications.

  • Recognize the limits of professional credentials and status; do not claim credentials before official notification.

  • Consider ethical decision-making as a structured process; use the 10-step model to guide actions and consider consequences and stakeholders.

Resources and Final Reminders

  • Check Canvas: Seminar Resources for ASHA Code of Ethics documents and other materials.

  • Access to Google Drive links via Canvas resources for additional reading and case materials.

  • Remember: today’s activity is preparatory; reflections and some submissions will occur in Week 88, not today.

  • If you have questions about sanctions or ethical guidelines, use official channels (ASHA Board of Ethics, state licensure boards) and document communications for accountability.

Closing Thoughts and Context

  • The ethical landscape is designed to protect clients and maintain the integrity of the profession; even seemingly minor errors can escalate if not properly addressed.

  • Building a reputation as an ethical, transparent clinician opens doors for private practice and professional opportunities; unethical actions can have long-lasting consequences.

  • The instructor emphasizes practical, real-world considerations (e.g., confidentiality, documentation, and accurate billing) and encourages ongoing engagement with ethical resources beyond today’s session.