9. Job Satisfaction
Antecedents of Job Satisfaction
Job Characteristics (Hackman & Oldham, 1976)
Characteristics influence psychological states, which in turn affect job satisfaction.
Research supports the link between perceived job characteristics and job satisfaction, but not necessarily objective characteristics.
Pay: Salary is more important when compared to people in similar jobs rather than different jobs.
Justice: Distributive and procedural justice are related to global and facet satisfaction.
Personality
Negative or positive affectivity.
Locus of Control: Individuals with an external locus of control tend to be less satisfied.
Gender: Few gender differences in job satisfaction.
Age: Curvilinear relationship – job satisfaction is lowest between ages 26 and 31.
Culture and ethnicity also play a role.
Definition of Job Satisfaction
A pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences (Locke’s Value Theory).
Job satisfaction arises when a job is meaningful, the individual feels responsible for the outcomes, and has knowledge of the results of their work (Job Characteristics Model - JCM, Hackman & Oldham).
Job satisfaction is partly a stable trait. Individuals with positive core self-evaluations (e.g., high self-esteem, emotional stability) are more likely to experience job satisfaction (Dispositional Approach, Judge et al.).
Theories of Job Satisfaction
Locke’s Value Theory:
Satisfaction arises when there is a match between what an individual values in a job and what they actually perceive to be receiving.
Dissatisfaction occurs when expectations or values are unmet.
Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors:
Job satisfaction is influenced by motivator factors (e.g., achievement, recognition, the work itself).
Hygiene factors (e.g., salary, company policies, working conditions) prevent dissatisfaction but do not create satisfaction.
Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not opposites. The presence of motivators leads to satisfaction.
Absence of motivators does not necessarily cause dissatisfaction; dissatisfaction is caused by poor hygiene factors.
Job Characteristics Model:
This theory emphasizes core job dimensions like :
skill variety,
task identity,
task significance,
autonomy, and
feedback as drivers of satisfaction.
Measuring Job Satisfaction
Approach :
Focuses on how much people like their jobs.
Easy to measure and central in many theories.
Global Approach: Overall satisfaction with work.
Facet Approach: Satisfaction with aspects of the job.
Person-Job Fit
Match between the individual and the job.
People differ in their reactions to the same situation.
Characteristics of the person act as a moderator.
Moderator: A variable that affects the relationship between two other variables.
Assessment
Self-report survey using standard scales.
Standard Scales:
Job Descriptive Index (JDI): Measures 5 facets of job satisfaction.
Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ): Measures global job satisfaction.
Job In General (JIG): Measures global job satisfaction.
Triangulation of data is important.
using more than one assessment approach to gain a more complete and accurate understanding of a person's job satisfaction
Effects of Job Satisfaction
Job Performance: More evidence suggests that performance causes satisfaction.
Turnover: Dissatisfied people are more likely to quit.
Absence: Very small correlation; other factors are more important.
Health and Well-Being: Relates to physical symptoms and negative emotions.
Life Satisfaction: Influenced by job satisfaction.
Spillover, compensation, and segmentation hypotheses.
Spillover Hypothesis: Satisfaction or dissatisfaction from one life domain (e.g., job) affects other domains (e.g., general life satisfaction).
Compensation Hypothesis: Dissatisfaction in one domain is compensated by seeking greater satisfaction in another.
Segmentation Hypothesis: Different life domains are kept separate, with little to no impact between them.
Commitment
Three Components of Organizational Commitment:
Acceptance of organizational goals.
Intention to stay on the job.
Willingness to work hard.
Three Types of Organizational Commitment (Meyer & Allen):
Affective: Liking the job.
Continuance: Needing the job.
Normative: Feeling obligated to stay on the job.
Case Study: Karina
Karina (35 years old) has worked for 8 years in a financial technology company.
She was recognized as an accomplished employee and received the "Employee of the Year" award.
However, in the last 6 months, Karina has shown changes: she often goes home on time, rarely takes initiative, and seems less enthusiastic about her work.
Factors that Emerged:
Karina feels her work is no longer challenging and often does the same thing repeatedly.
Her supervisor rarely provides feedback or rewards for her achievements.
Salary and office facilities are quite good, even above average.
Colleagues are quite supportive, but Karina no longer feels "meaningful" in her job.
Karina is a perfectionist and has high self-efficacy.
Questions from the Case Study:
What values might not be fulfilled?
Which factors are hygiene factors and which are motivators in Karina's case?
Does Karina's work have elements of task significance, autonomy, or feedback?