9. Job Satisfaction

Antecedents of Job Satisfaction

  • Job Characteristics (Hackman & Oldham, 1976)

    • Characteristics influence psychological states, which in turn affect job satisfaction.

    • Research supports the link between perceived job characteristics and job satisfaction, but not necessarily objective characteristics.

    • Pay: Salary is more important when compared to people in similar jobs rather than different jobs.

    • Justice: Distributive and procedural justice are related to global and facet satisfaction.

  • Personality

    • Negative or positive affectivity.

    • Locus of Control: Individuals with an external locus of control tend to be less satisfied.

    • Gender: Few gender differences in job satisfaction.

    • Age: Curvilinear relationship – job satisfaction is lowest between ages 26 and 31.

    • Culture and ethnicity also play a role.

Definition of Job Satisfaction

  • A pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences (Locke’s Value Theory).

  • Job satisfaction arises when a job is meaningful, the individual feels responsible for the outcomes, and has knowledge of the results of their work (Job Characteristics Model - JCM, Hackman & Oldham).

  • Job satisfaction is partly a stable trait. Individuals with positive core self-evaluations (e.g., high self-esteem, emotional stability) are more likely to experience job satisfaction (Dispositional Approach, Judge et al.).

Theories of Job Satisfaction

  • Locke’s Value Theory:

    • Satisfaction arises when there is a match between what an individual values in a job and what they actually perceive to be receiving.

    • Dissatisfaction occurs when expectations or values are unmet.

  • Herzberg’s Hygiene Factors:

    • Job satisfaction is influenced by motivator factors (e.g., achievement, recognition, the work itself).

    • Hygiene factors (e.g., salary, company policies, working conditions) prevent dissatisfaction but do not create satisfaction.

    • Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are not opposites. The presence of motivators leads to satisfaction.

    • Absence of motivators does not necessarily cause dissatisfaction; dissatisfaction is caused by poor hygiene factors.

  • Job Characteristics Model:

    • This theory emphasizes core job dimensions like :

      • skill variety,

      • task identity,

      • task significance,

      • autonomy, and

      • feedback as drivers of satisfaction.

Measuring Job Satisfaction

  • Approach :

    • Focuses on how much people like their jobs.

    • Easy to measure and central in many theories.

      • Global Approach: Overall satisfaction with work.

      • Facet Approach: Satisfaction with aspects of the job.

Person-Job Fit

  • Match between the individual and the job.

  • People differ in their reactions to the same situation.

    • Characteristics of the person act as a moderator.

      • Moderator: A variable that affects the relationship between two other variables.

Assessment

  • Self-report survey using standard scales.

  • Standard Scales:

    • Job Descriptive Index (JDI): Measures 5 facets of job satisfaction.

    • Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ): Measures global job satisfaction.

    • Job In General (JIG): Measures global job satisfaction.

  • Triangulation of data is important.

    • using more than one assessment approach to gain a more complete and accurate understanding of a person's job satisfaction

Effects of Job Satisfaction

  • Job Performance: More evidence suggests that performance causes satisfaction.

  • Turnover: Dissatisfied people are more likely to quit.

  • Absence: Very small correlation; other factors are more important.

  • Health and Well-Being: Relates to physical symptoms and negative emotions.

  • Life Satisfaction: Influenced by job satisfaction.

  • Spillover, compensation, and segmentation hypotheses.

    • Spillover Hypothesis: Satisfaction or dissatisfaction from one life domain (e.g., job) affects other domains (e.g., general life satisfaction).

    • Compensation Hypothesis: Dissatisfaction in one domain is compensated by seeking greater satisfaction in another.

    • Segmentation Hypothesis: Different life domains are kept separate, with little to no impact between them.

Commitment

  • Three Components of Organizational Commitment:

    • Acceptance of organizational goals.

    • Intention to stay on the job.

    • Willingness to work hard.

  • Three Types of Organizational Commitment (Meyer & Allen):

    • Affective: Liking the job.

    • Continuance: Needing the job.

    • Normative: Feeling obligated to stay on the job.

Case Study: Karina

  • Karina (35 years old) has worked for 8 years in a financial technology company.

  • She was recognized as an accomplished employee and received the "Employee of the Year" award.

  • However, in the last 6 months, Karina has shown changes: she often goes home on time, rarely takes initiative, and seems less enthusiastic about her work.

  • Factors that Emerged:

    • Karina feels her work is no longer challenging and often does the same thing repeatedly.

    • Her supervisor rarely provides feedback or rewards for her achievements.

    • Salary and office facilities are quite good, even above average.

    • Colleagues are quite supportive, but Karina no longer feels "meaningful" in her job.

    • Karina is a perfectionist and has high self-efficacy.

Questions from the Case Study:

  • What values might not be fulfilled?

  • Which factors are hygiene factors and which are motivators in Karina's case?

  • Does Karina's work have elements of task significance, autonomy, or feedback?