bandura (aggression)

Transmission of Aggression Through Imitation of Aggressive Models by Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A. Ross

Introduction

  • The concept of identification in terms of incidental learning was previously studied, revealing that children tend to imitate behaviors exhibited by adult models. Key study: Bandura & Huston (1961).
  • Other studies (e.g., Blake, 1958; Grosser et al., 1951; Rosenblith, 1959; Schachter & Hall, 1952) show that merely observing a model can significantly facilitate the subject's behavioral responses in a social context.
  • To further investigate imitative learning, especially in new contexts absent of the original model, an experiment was designed where children observed aggressive and nonaggressive adult models.

Hypothesis

  • Primary Hypothesis: Children exposed to aggressive models will demonstrate more aggressive behaviors compared to children exposed to nonaggressive models and those with no model exposure.
    • This hypothesis is grounded in the theory that prior reinforcement from models leads to learned imitative behaviors.
  • Generalization Effect: It was predicted that exposure to nonaggressive models will inhibit aggressive responses in children compared to control groups, with the expectation of significant behavioral differences.
  • Additional hypotheses focused on the sex of models and subjects, anticipating that children would imitate behaviors more readily from same-sex models. Specifically:
    • Male children would be more inclined to imitate aggression, especially from male models, due to the masculine association with aggression.

Agents and Subjects

  • Subjects: 72 children (36 boys and 36 girls) from the Stanford University Nursery School, ages ranging from 37 to 69 months (mean age: 52 months).
  • Models Used: Two adult models (one male and one female).
  • Experiment Structure: Children divided into eight experimental groups plus a control group of 24 (not exposed to models).
  • Each experimental group contained same-sex and opposite-sex model exposure, with half observing aggressive models and half observing nonaggressive models.

Methodological Design

Matching and Rating
  • Subjects were matched based on ratings of aggressive behavior during social interactions at the nursery school. Ratings were conducted on four five-point scales measuring:
    • Physical aggression
    • Verbal aggression
    • Aggression towards inanimate objects
    • Aggressive inhibition (assessing tendency to inhibit aggression under provocation)
  • Interrater Reliability: The composite aggression score (from the four scales) showed a reliability of 0.89, with assessments made by both the experimenter and a nursery school teacher.
Experimental Conditions
  1. Initial Setup:

    • The subjects were brought to an experimental room where they engaged in a play activity with a model present but separated.
    • Nonaggressive models engaged quietly, whereas aggressive models displayed aggressive behavior towards a Bobo doll, including:
      • Punching
      • Striking with a mallet
      • Tossing the doll
      • Verbally aggressive remarks like "Sock him in the nose…"
  2. Imitative Learning Demonstration:

    • For significant learning to occur in this context, the models performed unique patterns of aggressive behavior that would likely not manifest without observation.
    • Children’s attention was diverted to ensure they observed model behavior without direct prompts to imitate.
Aggression Arousal
  • Prior to imitation tests, subjects underwent a mild aggression arousal to stimulate aggression behaviors uniformly across groups. This aimed to highlight differences in aggression post-exposure:
    • Attraction to toys was used to engage subjects, followed by a suggestion that those toys were exclusively for other children, encouraging provocation for aggression.
Test for Imitation
  • After 10 minutes, subjects were moved to a new room filled with various toys (aggressive and nonaggressive). They were observed for a full 20 minutes, categorized into:
    • Physical aggressive imitation
    • Verbal aggressive imitation
    • Nonimitative aggression
    • Nonaggressive behavior responses

Results

Imitation of Models' Behavior
  • Children in the aggressive condition exhibited significant physical and verbal imitative aggression compared to nonaggressive and control groups, marked by clear differences in mean scores (refer to Table 1).
  • Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences in aggression due to model exposure using Friedman two-way analysis of variance.
    • Pairwise comparison revealed that aggressive model exposure led to greater aggression levels compared to subjects observing nonaggressive models.
Partial Imitation
  • Children demonstrated partial imitation of observed behaviors, especially more mallet aggression and nonimitative responses when exposed to aggressive models.
  • Specifically, girls with nonaggressive exposure displayed fewer aggressive responses compared to those with respective control conditions.
Influence of Sex of Model
  • Boys exhibited higher levels of imitative physical aggression than girls in response to male models, confirming partial support of the hypothesis regarding sex influence on aggression imitation.
  • Though no significant differences were seen in the verbal aggression response as a function of sex, stronger overall effects stemmed from male model exposure.
Nonimitative Aggression and Play Behavior
  • Behavioral differences persisted across conditions, particularly in nonimitative aggression and engagement in nonaggressive behaviors, with significant play behavior alterations based on treatment conditions:
    • Nonaggressive models resulted in subjects being less aggressive and exhibiting more nonaggressive play.
    • Notable gender-specific play patterns emerged, such as girls spending more time on certain nonaggressive activities and boys on exploratory, aggressive play.

Discussion

  • Current social learning research emphasizes behavior shaping through rewards & punishments while noting that mere observation influences initiating certain behaviors.
  • Findings corroborate that observing aggressive adult behaviors serves as a potent strategy for eliciting such behaviors while weakening inhibitory responses in children.
  • Imitation occurred distinctly in observable aggressive behaviors showcasing a compelling evidence of learning through observation without reinforcement.
Theoretical Implications
  • The study challenges past frameworks (notably Miller & Dollard's approach) by suggesting learning via observation can establish complex imitative behaviors independently of reinforcement or direct modeling.
  • Suggests re-evaluating the mechanisms of observational learning within a social context, indicating that behavior may transfer across contexts based solely on observation of aggression, regardless of model quality.
Conclusion
  • The outcomes indicated a strong tendency for children, notably boys, to imitate aggression observed in male adult models, while also demonstrating significant effects of nonaggressive exposure in inhibiting potential aggressive responses.
  • The research sheds light on implications for psychoanalytic interpretations involving identification with aggressors, while paving the way for further exploration into effective modeling for child behavior adaptations.