Bias and Confounding Lecture Notes

BIAS AND CONFOUNDING

  • Objectives of the Lecture
    • Describe bias and confounders in observational and interventional studies.
    • Identify sources of bias and confounders.
    • Discuss methods to reduce bias in study designs.

Key Concepts

Observed Associations

  • The observed association in quantitative studies can arise from:
    • Bias (Systematic Error): Errors in study design that create a false association between exposure and disease.
    • Confounding Bias: A distortion in the association between exposure and disease due to a third variable (confounder).
    • Variance (Random Error): Observed associations caused by chance.
  • These are alternative explanations for observed associations.

Validity of a Study

Internal Validity

  • Refers to whether a study is designed and conducted properly to yield accurate results.
    • Depends on:
    • Randomization
    • Measurement and assessment of variables
    • Participant dropouts
    • Overall methodology

External Validity

  • The extent to which study results can be generalized to the larger population.
    • Depends on:
    • Recruitment and selection of participants
    • Eligibility criteria
    • Sample size
    • Study setting

Errors in Study Design

  • Validity Issues: How well the study measures what it's intended to measure.
  • Errors: Uncertainties in data estimates and inferences.
    • Bias: Systematic deviations from the true value leading to a statistical bias.
    • Variance: Random errors caused by mistakes from various sources (respondents, interviewers).

Understanding Bias

  • Defined as a systematic error leading to incorrect estimates of association.
  • Can occur at any research stage and is classified by occurrence stage and direction.
  • Examples:
    • Failure to calibrate equipment
    • Systematic shifts from true values, usually clustered away from them.

Detecting Bias

  • Investigative steps include:
    • Identifying Sources: Determines strength and magnitude of bias.
    • Estimating Magnitude: A large bias can falsely weaken associations.
    • Assessing Direction: Bias can underestimate or overestimate associations.

Examples of Bias Impact

  1. Example 1: Relative risk of cancer = 1.9 (actual) vs. biased estimate = 1.4 (underestimated).
  2. Example 2: Treatment group cancer risk = 0.4 (actual) vs. biased estimate = 0.7 (underestimated).
  3. Example 3: Exposure risk = 2.0 (actual) vs. biased estimate = 2.6 (overestimated).
  4. Example 4: Treatment risk = 0.5 (actual) vs. biased estimate = 0.3 (overestimated).

Types of Bias

  • Bias is categorized based on recruitment methods, participation factors, and data collection distortions.
  • Selection Bias:
    • Types include:
    • Sampling bias
    • Survivor bias
    • Non-response bias
    • Attrition bias
    • Volunteer bias
    • Under-coverage bias
  • Information Bias:
    • Types include:
    • Recall bias
    • Interviewer bias
    • Misclassification bias
    • Performance bias
    • Regression to the mean

Selection Bias

  • Results from how study participants are selected; leads to false associations.
  • More pronounced in case-control and retrospective cohort studies.
  • Key Features:
    • Occurs when eligibility differs based on exposure/outcome.
    • Difficult to correct once identified.

Avoiding Selection Bias

  • Use consistent criteria for case/control selection.
  • Aim for high participation rates and improve recruitment retention.
  • Adopt various participant tracing methods.

Information Bias

  • Results from differences in information accuracy among study groups.
  • Examples and types include:
    • Recall Bias: Differential recall ability in a case-control context.
    • Interviewer Bias: Bias arising from the interviewer's knowledge of participant disease status.

Avoiding Information Bias

  • Use blinding techniques to prevent bias in information collection and classification.
  • Design clear and unbiased questionnaires.

Confounding

  • Occurs when additional exposures affect both the disease and the exposure of interest.
  • Independent Risk Factors: Related to both the disease of study and the exposure.
  • Controlling for Confounding:
    • Can be done in design/analysis phase through various methods such as randomization, stratification, and multivariate analysis.