Employee Relations and the Workplace Climate Notes

Employee Relations and Workplace Climate

Lecture Goals

  • Discuss challenges, theory, research, and practice in employee relations.
  • Understand how employee relations affects employee attitudes and the overall workplace climate in organizations.
  • Recognize the impact on individual motivation.

The AMO Model of Performance

  • Source: Boxall, P and Purcell J (2022) Strategy and Human Resource Management. London: Bloomsbury Academic, p. 180.

Psychological Contracting

  • Expectations are built on perceived promises at recruitment and individual interpretations of HR practices and management behavior over time.
  • Perceived delivery of the deal?:
    • Yes: Higher trust and greater commitment.
    • No: Lower trust and commitment due to violation or accumulated breaches.

Definitions

  • Employee relations: The way management relates to employees as stakeholders, including the style of management in negotiations and avenues for employee voice.
  • Workplace climate: The atmosphere of the workplace, characterized by variables like trust in management and personal inclusion.

What’s at Stake in Employee Relations and the Workplace Climate?

  • The employment relationship is an 'effort-reward' bargain with both specified and ambiguous parts.
  • Long-term employment is an ongoing, negotiated relationship.
  • Emotions matter, and taking advantage of the other party can have negative consequences.
Common/Complementary Interests
  • A profitable organization.
  • A growing organization.
  • High level of safety.
Typical Areas of Conflict
  • Wage share versus profit share.
  • Fair workload versus work intensification.
  • Self-control of methods versus management control.
  • Job security versus organizational restructuring.
Moments of Negotiation
  • Occur at the beginning of employment and when employees expect rewards for improved skills or contributions (psychological contracting).
  • Formal Negotiation:
    • At the point of the employment offer.
    • During collective bargaining with a union.
  • Informal Negotiation:
    • E.g., negotiating with a supervisor over hours or holidays.
Effect of Individual Talent
  • Employees with critical and hard-to-replace skills have greater bargaining power.
  • Example: Chefs in Edwards and Ram’s (2006: 909) study of Indian restaurants in Britain had greater autonomy due to their skills being in short supply.
General Economic Effect
  • A strong economy shifts the balance of power towards workers, while a weak economy shifts it towards employers.
Effect of the Legal Context
  • Countries with reasonable and well-enforced employment laws provide employees with negotiating rights.
  • NZ Rights: www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/rights-and- responsibilities/employee-rights-and-responsibilities?stage=Live
Test for New Job Acceptances
  • Given a written offer?
  • Asked if you had any questions?
  • Given satisfactory answers?
  • Told you could get independent advice?
  • Given sufficient time to get advice?
  • Given a copy of the final signed agreement?
  • Score out of 6?
Duty of ‘Good Faith’ in New Zealand
  • Applies to both parties.
  • Includes telling the truth, listening, being responsive, and ensuring a fair process in changes that could lead to job loss.
  • See: www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/rights-and- responsibilities/good-faith
Union Rights and Collective Bargaining
  • Union members have rights to collective bargaining.
  • Union advocates have constituents (union members).
  • HR managers also have constituents (other managers and company directors).
Impact of Low Trust
  • Negotiations may be protracted and involve conflict (picketing, strikes, lock-outs, boycotts, media campaigns) when there is a low-trust climate.
  • Negotiation styles create ‘legacies’ that affect future change.

Types of Negotiation: Position-Based Bargaining

  • Traditional approach: Parties develop claims ('positions') and argue for their own position against the other party’s.
  • Key Concepts:
    • Opening Claim
    • Target Point
    • Resistance Point
    • Solution/Settlement
Preparation for Position-Based Bargaining
  • Consider:
    • What matters most to your constituents?
    • What evidence and arguments are strongest?
    • Where to avoid or minimize concessions?
    • What matters most to the other side?
    • What are you prepared to concede?
    • Where to compromise?
    • Where can joint problem-solving be used?
  • Thinking from the other side's perspective is crucial.
Process of Position-Based Bargaining
  • Tabling of claims and counter-claims (written, numbered, and dated).
  • Giving explanations, reasons, and data.
  • Advocates do the talking.
  • Use of adjournments for intra-party debate.
  • Rewriting of claims.
  • Splitting differences at the end (50/50 is common).
Strengths and Weaknesses of Position-Based Bargaining
  • Strengths:
    • Constituents understand the process well.
    • Seasoned advocates know what to expect.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Conflict can escalate.
    • Opportunities for joint problem-solving can be lost.
    • Can create ill-feeling, lower productivity, and greater employee turnover.

Types of Negotiation: Problem-Based Bargaining

  • An alternative or complementary approach.
  • Starts from the premise: 'we have a problem' or 'we both have an interest in making a change'.
Behaviors in Problem-Based Bargaining
  • Openly acknowledge the shift of approach.
  • Tabling of investigations/studies.
  • Anyone can talk about the problem.
  • Use of longer processes (joint working parties).
  • Development of a common proposal.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Problem-Based Bargaining
  • Strengths:
    • Opportunities for mutual gain through joint problem-solving ('creating value').
    • Improves the bargaining experience.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Constituents may not understand the process well.
    • May be seen as 'selling-out'.
    • Can be time-consuming and costly.
    • Can be subverted by a party who is not genuine.

What Type of Negotiation is Best?

  • Joint problem-solving is useful in areas of shared concern.
  • Many collective negotiations blend both approaches.
  • HR managers and union advocates should be versatile.

Negotiation Skills

  • Skilled negotiators avoid insults and self-praise.
  • They control their emotions.
  • They use only the best arguments.
  • They are good at asking questions and active listening.
Rules of Active Listening
  • (a) Don’t jump to conclusions or think only about what you're going to say. Hear the other person first and don’t interrupt
  • (b) Reflect back what they have communicated before making your own point
  • (c) Periodically summarise where the discussion has come to and ask the other person if they agree with your summary

Applying Psychological Contracting Theory to the Collective Level: The Renco Case

  • Gap between employee expectations and experience in HRM.
  • Grant (1999) explores four types of psychological contract between management and a workforce.
Four Types of Psychological Contracts
  • Congruent Contract: Management’s rhetoric coincides with employee perceptions of reality.
  • Mismatched Contract: Rhetoric fails because it has no appeal and does not match the perceived reality.
  • Partial Contract: Parts of the rhetoric appeal, and parts do not.
  • Trial Contract: Rhetoric is given a chance to prove itself.
The Renco Case Study
  • UK consumer electronics sector.
  • Japanese-owned company promised Japanese practices.
  • Workers were keen to give the approach a chance (trial contract).
  • After 18 months, management practice diverged from rhetoric.
  • Consultative practices decayed.
  • Employees revised their effort.
  • The psychological contract shifted to a mismatched one.
Implications of the Renco Case
  • Danger of raising expectations and then dashing them.
  • Cynicism is bred, damaging the workplace climate.
Trust vs. Distrust
  • A trigger event (breaking a critical commitment) can lead to distrust.

Creating a Climate for Diversity in Organizations

  • Houkamau and Boxall (2011) discuss creating a positive climate for diversity.
Diversity Support Activities in NZ Organizations
  • (n = 479)
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 448.
Family-Friendly Employment Practices in NZ
  • (n = 479)
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 449.
Proactive EEO Practices
  • (n = 479)
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 450.
Worker Perceptions of Diversity Climate in NZ
  • (n = 479)
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 453.
Mean Scores by Type of Organization
Type of organizationDiversity vision (range: 0–5)Diversity support (range: 0–16)Family-friendly employment practices (range: 0–5)Proactive EEO practices (range: 0–5)
NZ-owned firm1.754.603.562.69
Foreign- owned firm2.375.673.452.59
NZ public sector2.936.813.602.94
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 450.
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square Statistic
Outcome variableSize of organization (3 df)Likelihood ratio chi- square statisticp-value
Diversity vision21.7***.000
Diversity support12.5**.006
Family-friendly employment practices2.0.573
Proactive EEO practices4.7.198
Diversity climate1.2.746
  • Source: Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 49(4): 452.
Typical Management Actions
  • Leadership commitments to diversity and inclusion.
  • Development of key practices (e.g., flexibility, bias checks, zero tolerance).
  • Management training in key HR processes.
Formal Policy and Resources
  • Larger companies and public sector organizations are likely to have:
    • More formal policy (e.g., targets for gender representation).
    • Better resources (e.g., dedicated specialists).
    • Better measurement of outcomes (e.g., workforce survey).
Backfire Effect
  • The public sector has the lowest rating in terms of diversity climate despite greater formal diversity management.
  • A ‘backfire effect’ (shifting from a trial to a mismatched psychological contract).
Positive Outcomes for Employees
  • Can be achieved effectively in organizations with little formal policy or few resources.
  • Key issue: responding positively to family-friendly needs and diversity concerns.

Lecture Conclusions

  • Long-term employment is a negotiated relationship; emotions matter.
  • Management actions in employee relations affect individuals through the climate they create.
  • Low trust leads to protracted negotiations and conflict.
  • Psychological contracting theory applies to the collective level.
  • NZ workers value family-friendly HR practices and an inclusive workplace climate, achievable in all sizes of organizations, but can be damaged by the ‘backfire effect’.