MGD 10.1 Personalised medicine I
Context of the Lecture
From "Molecules, Genes and Disease 2025" by Dr. Anusha Sathyanarayanan.
Theme: Analyzing patient data for proactive interventions and personalized treatment plans.
Learning Outcomes (Lectures 10.1 & 10.2)
Concept of personalised medicine: Understand its definition and an explanation of the objective.
Gene therapy application: Apply gene therapy concepts to clinical scenarios.
Diagnosis and management: Utilize understanding for genetic/congenital disorders, abnormal blood tests, skin lesions, jaundice, visual abnormalities, bowel habit changes, and nausea/vomiting.
Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Explain improvements personalised medicine can bring to reduce ADRs.
Rare diseases: Describe how personalised medicine increases treatment options through alternative uses for existing medicines.
Cost implications: Explain both positive and negative financial viewpoints.
Personal genome sequencing (PGS): Describe the process and its associated ethical, economic, and social issues.
Gene and immunotherapy principles: Describe their biological origins.
Specific therapies: Explain gene and immunotherapies currently in development and clinical practice.
Personalised Medicine: Definition and Aims
Definition: Also known as precision medicine; it uses an individual's unique genetic material to tailor therapy.
Aims to achieve the best therapeutic response and ensure safety.
Goals: Facilitate earlier diagnoses, improve risk assessments, and enable optimal treatments.
Holds potential to enhance health care quality and reduce costs.
How Personalised Medicine Offers Better Health Outcomes
Prevention: Enables early disease detection rather than reactive treatment.
Optimal therapy selection: Reduces trial-and-error prescribing, leading to more effective treatments.
Reduced ADRs: Minimizes adverse drug reactions.
Increased patient adherence: Patients are more likely to comply with tailored treatments.
Improved quality of life: Enhances patient well-being.
New uses for medicines: Identifies alternative applications for existing drugs and those in trials.
Cost-effective healthcare: Streamlines treatment pathways and reduces overall healthcare expenditure.
Need for Personalised Medicine
Variability in drug effectiveness: Clinical studies highlight significant differences in drug responses across patient populations.
Non-response rates: A notable proportion of patients do not respond to drugs within a given class.
Example: Variations in drug response across populations are well-documented.
Tailored Approach: Clinical Contexts and Trials
Example: The CLL206 trial demonstrated high effectiveness of Alemtuzumab + methylprednisolone as an induction regimen for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) with TP53 deletion.
Personalised Medicine in Practice: Key Ideas
Vision: Faster diagnoses and personalised treatments with fewer side effects.
Four Ps Framework:
Prediction and Prevention: Identifying individuals at risk before symptom onset.
More Precise diagnoses: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy through deeper understanding of molecular and cellular processes.
Personalised and targeted interventions: Delivering treatments specifically tailored to individuals.
A more Participatory role for patients: Empowering patients to be actively involved in their healthcare decisions.
Prediction and Prevention of Disease
Goal: Utilize and other diagnostics to identify at-risk individuals before symptoms appear.
Benefits: Enables new treatment options and informed lifestyle choices.
Impact: Potential to reduce the burden of long-term conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.
More Precise Diagnoses
Traditional approach: Relies solely on symptoms and standard tests.
Enhanced understanding: Achieved by integrating molecular and cellular process insights with clinical and diagnostic information.
Enabling technologies: Includes diagnostic imaging, digital pathology, genomics, and informatics.
100,000 Genomes Project (UK)
Overview: Launched in 2012 and completed in December 2018, sequencing genomes from approximately participants.
Participants: Included NHS patients with rare diseases (and their families) and cancer patients.
Early diagnoses: Identified conditions such as LEOPARD syndrome, familial breast cancer, and GLUT1 deficiency syndrome.
Results: Analysis completed and results returned to NHS patients in July .
Significance: A world-first study demonstrating that whole genome sequencing (WGS) can uncover new diagnoses across a broad range of rare diseases, with potential benefits for the NHS.
Jessica Case (Illustrative 100,000 Genomes Project Example)
Challenge: Jessica had a rare, previously hard-to-identify condition.
Resolution: Her family participated in the 100k Genomes Project, and WGS provided a molecular diagnosis, allowing for informed treatment decisions.
Personalised and Targeted Interventions
Current variability: Only about - of patients effectively respond to many pharmaceutical interventions.
Concept: Utilizes pharmacogenomic profiling via genetic variants to identify the optimal treatment for an individual.
Example study: and polymorphisms influence warfarin dose variability in long-term anticoagulation patients (Santos et al., 2013).
Practical implication: Tailors drug choice and dosing based on genetic profile to improve safety and efficacy.
Preventing Dangerous Side Effects
Variant analysis: Can predict the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
ADRs impact: Contribute to approximately of hospital admissions in the UK.
Benefits: Predicting and preventing ADRs can reduce the burden on emergency departments and improve patient experience.
Is a Variant Benign or Pathogenic?
Classification: Variants are classified using a 5-point scale, ranging from benign to pathogenic.
Resources for interpretation: ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), OMIM (http://omim.org/), and Genomics England 100,000 Genomes project resources.
A More Participatory Role for Patients
Public awareness: Drives the deployment and adoption of personalised medicine.
Patient initiative: A 2015 Inspire survey showed of new treatment discussions were initiated by patients.
Engagement: Approximately two-thirds of patients bring notes or questions to consultations, indicating active participation.
Summary Framework (The University of Buckingham Slide)
Core pillars: Patients, Information, Government, Precision medicine, Analysis, Data, Regulation.
Potential Impact on Outcomes
Personalised medicine offers significant advantages for individuals, populations, the NHS, scientific research, and the wider economy.
Cancer as a Model for Personalised Medicine
Heterogeneity: Cancer is highly diverse, with over known types.
Treatment challenge: There is no single universal cancer treatment; no "magic bullet" or one-size-fits-all solution.
Response rates: Some cancers exhibit response rates as low as ().
Cancer Biomarkers: Definition and Uses
Definition: A biological molecule that indicates a normal or abnormal process, or a disease state (e.g., cancer) within blood, bodily fluids, or tissues (according to NCI).
Potential Uses for Cancer Biomarkers (Examples)
Estimate cancer risk: BRCA1 germline mutation for screening.
Prostate cancer risk: Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) for screening.
Differential diagnosis: Immunohistochemistry to determine tissue of origin.
Prognosis: 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype) to predict recurrence.
Therapy response: K-Ras mutation and anti-EGFR in Colorectal Cancer (CRC); HER2 expression and anti-HER2 therapies in breast/gastric cancer; Estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer.
Disease monitoring: CEA (colorectal), AFP, LDH, (germ cell tumors).
Breast Cancer Subtypes (Intrinsic/Molecular)
Luminal A (approximately ): Hormone Receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PR+), HER2-negative, low Ki-67; targeted therapy: Tamoxifen; best prognosis.
Normal-like (approximately ): HR-positive, HER2-negative; similar therapy considerations; slightly worse prognosis than Luminal A.
Luminal B (approximately ): HR-positive, HER2-positive or negative, high Ki-67; indicates fast cancer cell growth; targeted therapy: Tamoxifen.
HER2-enriched (approximately ): HR-negative, HER2-positive; faster growth; targeted therapy: Herceptin (Trastuzumab).
Triple Negative (approximately ): HR-negative, PR-negative, HER2-negative; most aggressive subtype; higher association with BRCA1 mutations.
Breast Cancer Therapies
Tamoxifen: Standard treatment for ER-positive early-stage breast cancer (about of cases).
Metabolized by into its active form, endoxifen; genetic variants of can affect its activity and metabolism.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin): A monoclonal antibody targeting HER2; used for HER2-positive breast cancer (found in about of cases); prognosis varies with HER2 status.
Breast Cancer Testing: Oncotype DX
Description: A genomic test designed for early-stage, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.
Analyzes the expression of cancer-related genes to predict tumor behavior and treatment response.
NICE approval: Approved in 2013 for NHS England/Wales as a cost-effective method to determine recurrence risk and guide treatment decisions.
Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) and Chemotherapy Benefit
Recurrence Score (RS): The assay provides a score on a scale, typically interpreted in bands such as RS 0-10, RS 11-15, RS 16-20, RS 21-25, RS 26-100.
Example data (for RS 26-100, all ages): Shows an absolute chemotherapy (CT) benefit of approximately \%; distant recurrence risk with Tamoxifen (Tam) alone is \%
Gene components: Includes genes like Estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, Ki-67, GRB7, STK15, BC12, Survivin, BAG1, among others (total 21 genes, with 16 relevant to breast cancer in the assay).
Breast Cancer Prevention
Molecular markers: Can indicate risk before symptoms, guiding preventive actions.
Preventive steps: Include lifestyle modifications, increased mammography surveillance, elective surgery, and chemoprevention.
Angelina Jolie example: Her high BRCA mutation risk led to bilateral mastectomy and oophorectomy due to estimated risks (breast , ovarian ).
Cost of Healthcare and Case Study
Increased efficiency: Personalised medicine can reduce healthcare costs by minimizing trial-and-error dosing, decreasing hospitalizations due to ADRs, and avoiding late diagnoses and reactive treatments.
Case study (Epstein et al., 2010): Reported \%
Fewer hospitalizations overall for warfarin dosing: With up to \%
Fewer hospitalizations for bleeding or thromboembolism.
Barriers to Personalised Medicine
Costs: High expenses associated with diagnostic tests and potentially treatments.
Guideline adoption: Challenges in integrating personalised medicine into established guidelines from bodies like NICE (UK) and FDA (USA).
Knowledge and understanding: Gaps in knowledge among medical professionals and patients.
Data requirements: Requires massive data integration from genomic, transcriptomic, and microbiomic sources.
How Personalised Medicine Offers Better Health Outcomes (Revisited)
Key benefits: Reinforces prevention via early detection, selection of optimal therapy to reduce trial-and-error, decreased ADRs, increased patient adherence, improved quality of life, identification of new uses for medicines, and more cost-effective healthcare.
Drug Repurposing (Drug Repositioning)
Definition: The process of identifying new therapeutic uses for existing or available drugs.
Bases: Relies on the understanding that diseases often share common biological targets and that pleiotropic drugs can affect multiple biochemical pathways.
Drug Repurposing Examples (Common Examples Table)
Aspirin: Originally an analgesic; new indication includes colorectal cancer (CRC).
Azathioprine: Originally for rheumatoid arthritis; new indication for renal transplant.
Cycloserine: Originally for tuberculosis; new indication for depression.
Duloxetine: Originally for depression; new indication for stress urinary incontinence.
Galantamine: Originally for polio-related paralysis; new indication for Alzheimer's disease.
Gemcitabine: Originally an antiviral; new indication for cancer.
Finasteride: Originally for benign prostatic hyperplasia; new indication for hair loss.
Imatinib: Originally for chronic myelogenous leukemia; new indication for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).
Sildenafil: Originally for angina; new indications for erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
Thalidomide: Originally a sedative/antiemetic with teratogenicity concerns; repositioned for leprosy complications, then multiple myeloma, and potentially for COVID-19.
Zidovudine: Originally for HIV/AIDS; new indication for cancer.
Benefits: Drug repurposing can shorten development time, reduce costs, and extend the utility of shelved drugs to new patient populations.
Drug Repurposing – Aspirin (Details)
History: Marketed by Bayer in 1899 as an analgesic; repositioned in the 1980s at a low-dose as an anti-platelet agent for cardiovascular prevention.
Potential oncology role: May prevent the development of CRC through anti-platelet activity.
Mechanisms: Includes reduced platelet-tumor interactions, suppression of in tumor cells, and roles of and enzymes, leading to reduction and effects on angiogenesis.
Drug Repurposing – Thalidomide (History and Repurposing)
History: Banned by WHO in 1962 due to teratogenicity.
Repositioned: In 1998 for leprosy complications through inhibition; later, in 2006, as a first-line treatment for multiple myeloma.
Potential: Under consideration for severe COVID-19 cases.
Term: Often categorized with orphan drug status, used to treat rare diseases with government support.
Drug Repurposing – Sildenafil (Viagra)
Initial investigation: Initially studied for hypertension and angina.
Unexpected side effect: Observation of penile erections during trials led to its repositioning as Viagra leading to sales exceeding billion annually.
Further repositioning: Subsequently used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at a lower dose.
Anastrozole (Recent Repurposing Example)
IBIS-II study: Demonstrated that anastrozole reduces long-term breast cancer rates in high-risk postmenopausal women.
Recommendation: Suggested as a preventive drug-of-choice over tamoxifen in some guidelines.
Impact: A 2019 QMUL announcement indicated nearly women in England would be offered the drug to reduce breast cancer risk.
Drug Repurposing in Cancer: Targets and Benefits
Targets: Focuses on inhibiting tumor invasion & metastasis and implementing anti-angiogenesis strategies.
Examples: Includes compounds like Niclosamide, Minocycline, Esoteric EGFR antagonists, Bisphosphonates (Zoledronic Acid), Itraconazole, Curcumin, Ivermectin, Ritonavir, Doxycycline, Statins, Metformin, and Leflunomide, among others.
Benefits: Leads to reduced costs, faster development timelines, broadened patient access, and provides an opportunity to market shelved drugs.
Concept: Synergy between combination therapy and personalised medicine.
Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing
Accessibility: DNA sequencing is now cheap and fast, though data interpretation remains challenging.
Companies: Many companies offer personal genome analysis (e.g., 23andMe).
Example offerings: 23andMe provides risk assessments for late-onset Alzheimer’s and certain BRCA mutations (some FDA-approved).
Consumer marketing: Includes at-home genetic test packs offering multiple reports (ancestry, nutrigenetics, pharmacogenetics, etc.).
Price points (example): A 7-report bundle advertised at , discounted to .
Points to Consider for DTC Genetic Testing
Ethical, economic, legal, and social issues: These are central considerations.
Integration: The challenge of integrating personal/family medical history with traditional tests and genomics for medical decisions.
Validity of risk: Assessing the validity of risks associated with SNPs or mutations.
Ownership of DNA: Legal considerations regarding the ownership and use of samples and data after collection.
Role of genetic counselling: The importance of professional guidance in interpreting results.
Genetic Testing: Ethical Considerations (Who Cares About Your Genome?)
Potential interested parties: Family, spouse, doctors, government, police, schools, and insurance companies.
Key questions: Do meaningful interventions exist from this information? Is there potential for discrimination based on genetic data?
Ethical Debate Prompts (Self-directed Work)
Government agencies: Should patients’ DNA sequences be held by government agencies?
Selective termination: Should doctors make decisions on selective termination based on genetic information?
Patent mutations: Should drug discovery companies be allowed to patent novel mutations identified during drug discovery efforts?
Incidental findings: Should all incidental findings be disclosed to patients when performing personal genome analysis?
Practical Notes and References
Abbreviations used: ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor), HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), CK (Cytokeratin), Ki-67 (a marker for cell proliferation), CT (Chemotherapy), ADR (Adverse Drug Reaction).
Key sources cited: Include NICE, Genomics England, NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine), Lancet, Mol Oncol (Molecular Oncology), and various government reports.
Emphasis: Throughout the expansion of personalised medicine, ethical, social, and economic considerations are emphasized as