MGD 10.1 Personalised medicine I

  • Context of the Lecture

    • From "Molecules, Genes and Disease 2025" by Dr. Anusha Sathyanarayanan.

    • Theme: Analyzing patient data for proactive interventions and personalized treatment plans.

  • Learning Outcomes (Lectures 10.1 & 10.2)

    • Concept of personalised medicine: Understand its definition and an explanation of the objective.

    • Gene therapy application: Apply gene therapy concepts to clinical scenarios.

    • Diagnosis and management: Utilize understanding for genetic/congenital disorders, abnormal blood tests, skin lesions, jaundice, visual abnormalities, bowel habit changes, and nausea/vomiting.

    • Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs): Explain improvements personalised medicine can bring to reduce ADRs.

    • Rare diseases: Describe how personalised medicine increases treatment options through alternative uses for existing medicines.

    • Cost implications: Explain both positive and negative financial viewpoints.

    • Personal genome sequencing (PGS): Describe the process and its associated ethical, economic, and social issues.

    • Gene and immunotherapy principles: Describe their biological origins.

    • Specific therapies: Explain gene and immunotherapies currently in development and clinical practice.

  • Personalised Medicine: Definition and Aims

    • Definition: Also known as precision medicine; it uses an individual's unique genetic material to tailor therapy.

    • Aims to achieve the best therapeutic response and ensure safety.

    • Goals: Facilitate earlier diagnoses, improve risk assessments, and enable optimal treatments.

    • Holds potential to enhance health care quality and reduce costs.

  • How Personalised Medicine Offers Better Health Outcomes

    • Prevention: Enables early disease detection rather than reactive treatment.

    • Optimal therapy selection: Reduces trial-and-error prescribing, leading to more effective treatments.

    • Reduced ADRs: Minimizes adverse drug reactions.

    • Increased patient adherence: Patients are more likely to comply with tailored treatments.

    • Improved quality of life: Enhances patient well-being.

    • New uses for medicines: Identifies alternative applications for existing drugs and those in trials.

    • Cost-effective healthcare: Streamlines treatment pathways and reduces overall healthcare expenditure.

  • Need for Personalised Medicine

    • Variability in drug effectiveness: Clinical studies highlight significant differences in drug responses across patient populations.

    • Non-response rates: A notable proportion of patients do not respond to drugs within a given class.

    • Example: Variations in drug response across populations are well-documented.

  • Tailored Approach: Clinical Contexts and Trials

    • Example: The CLL206 trial demonstrated high effectiveness of Alemtuzumab + methylprednisolone as an induction regimen for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) with TP53 deletion.

  • Personalised Medicine in Practice: Key Ideas

    • Vision: Faster diagnoses and personalised treatments with fewer side effects.

    • Four Ps Framework:

    • Prediction and Prevention: Identifying individuals at risk before symptom onset.

    • More Precise diagnoses: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy through deeper understanding of molecular and cellular processes.

    • Personalised and targeted interventions: Delivering treatments specifically tailored to individuals.

    • A more Participatory role for patients: Empowering patients to be actively involved in their healthcare decisions.

  • Prediction and Prevention of Disease

    • Goal: Utilize genomic technologies\text{genomic technologies} and other diagnostics to identify at-risk individuals before symptoms appear.

    • Benefits: Enables new treatment options and informed lifestyle choices.

    • Impact: Potential to reduce the burden of long-term conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.

  • More Precise Diagnoses

    • Traditional approach: Relies solely on symptoms and standard tests.

    • Enhanced understanding: Achieved by integrating molecular and cellular process insights with clinical and diagnostic information.

    • Enabling technologies: Includes diagnostic imaging, digital pathology, genomics, and informatics.

  • 100,000 Genomes Project (UK)

    • Overview: Launched in 2012 and completed in December 2018, sequencing 100,000100,000 genomes from approximately 85,00085,000 participants.

    • Participants: Included NHS patients with rare diseases (and their families) and cancer patients.

    • Early diagnoses: Identified conditions such as LEOPARD syndrome, familial breast cancer, and GLUT1 deficiency syndrome.

    • Results: Analysis completed and results returned to NHS patients in July 20192019.

    • Significance: A world-first study demonstrating that whole genome sequencing (WGS) can uncover new diagnoses across a broad range of rare diseases, with potential benefits for the NHS.

  • Jessica Case (Illustrative 100,000 Genomes Project Example)

    • Challenge: Jessica had a rare, previously hard-to-identify condition.

    • Resolution: Her family participated in the 100k Genomes Project, and WGS provided a molecular diagnosis, allowing for informed treatment decisions.

  • Personalised and Targeted Interventions

    • Current variability: Only about 30%30\% - 60%60\% of patients effectively respond to many pharmaceutical interventions.

    • Concept: Utilizes pharmacogenomic profiling via genetic variants to identify the optimal treatment for an individual.

    • Example study: CYP2C9CYP2C9 and VKORC1VKORC1 polymorphisms influence warfarin dose variability in long-term anticoagulation patients (Santos et al., 2013).

    • Practical implication: Tailors drug choice and dosing based on genetic profile to improve safety and efficacy.

  • Preventing Dangerous Side Effects

    • Variant analysis: Can predict the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

    • ADRs impact: Contribute to approximately 115\frac{1}{15} of hospital admissions in the UK.

    • Benefits: Predicting and preventing ADRs can reduce the burden on emergency departments and improve patient experience.

  • Is a Variant Benign or Pathogenic?

    • Classification: Variants are classified using a 5-point scale, ranging from benign to pathogenic.

    • Resources for interpretation: ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/), OMIM (http://omim.org/), and Genomics England 100,000 Genomes project resources.

  • A More Participatory Role for Patients

    • Public awareness: Drives the deployment and adoption of personalised medicine.

    • Patient initiative: A 2015 Inspire survey showed 52%52\% of new treatment discussions were initiated by patients.

    • Engagement: Approximately two-thirds of patients bring notes or questions to consultations, indicating active participation.

  • Summary Framework (The University of Buckingham Slide)

    • Core pillars: Patients, Information, Government, Precision medicine, Analysis, Data, Regulation.

  • Potential Impact on Outcomes

    • Personalised medicine offers significant advantages for individuals, populations, the NHS, scientific research, and the wider economy.

  • Cancer as a Model for Personalised Medicine

    • Heterogeneity: Cancer is highly diverse, with over 200200 known types.

    • Treatment challenge: There is no single universal cancer treatment; no "magic bullet" or one-size-fits-all solution.

    • Response rates: Some cancers exhibit response rates as low as 15\frac{1}{5} (20%20\%).

  • Cancer Biomarkers: Definition and Uses

    • Definition: A biological molecule that indicates a normal or abnormal process, or a disease state (e.g., cancer) within blood, bodily fluids, or tissues (according to NCI).

  • Potential Uses for Cancer Biomarkers (Examples)

    • Estimate cancer risk: BRCA1 germline mutation for screening.

    • Prostate cancer risk: Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) for screening.

    • Differential diagnosis: Immunohistochemistry to determine tissue of origin.

    • Prognosis: 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype) to predict recurrence.

    • Therapy response: K-Ras mutation and anti-EGFR in Colorectal Cancer (CRC); HER2 expression and anti-HER2 therapies in breast/gastric cancer; Estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer.

    • Disease monitoring: CEA (colorectal), AFP, LDH, βHCG\beta \text{HCG} (germ cell tumors).

  • Breast Cancer Subtypes (Intrinsic/Molecular)

    • Luminal A (approximately 40%40\%): Hormone Receptor-positive (ER+ and/or PR+), HER2-negative, low Ki-67; targeted therapy: Tamoxifen; best prognosis.

    • Normal-like (approximately 2%8%2\%-8\%): HR-positive, HER2-negative; similar therapy considerations; slightly worse prognosis than Luminal A.

    • Luminal B (approximately 20%20\%): HR-positive, HER2-positive or negative, high Ki-67; indicates fast cancer cell growth; targeted therapy: Tamoxifen.

    • HER2-enriched (approximately 10%15%10\%-15\%): HR-negative, HER2-positive; faster growth; targeted therapy: Herceptin (Trastuzumab).

    • Triple Negative (approximately 15%20%15\%-20\%): HR-negative, PR-negative, HER2-negative; most aggressive subtype; higher association with BRCA1 mutations.

  • Breast Cancer Therapies

    • Tamoxifen: Standard treatment for ER-positive early-stage breast cancer (about 80%80\% of cases).

    • Metabolized by CYP2D6CYP2D6 into its active form, endoxifen; genetic variants of CYP2D6CYP2D6 can affect its activity and metabolism.

    • Trastuzumab (Herceptin): A monoclonal antibody targeting HER2; used for HER2-positive breast cancer (found in about 20%30%20\%-30\% of cases); prognosis varies with HER2 status.

  • Breast Cancer Testing: Oncotype DX

    • Description: A genomic test designed for early-stage, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.

    • Analyzes the expression of 1616 cancer-related genes to predict tumor behavior and treatment response.

    • NICE approval: Approved in 2013 for NHS England/Wales as a cost-effective method to determine recurrence risk and guide treatment decisions.

  • Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) and Chemotherapy Benefit

    • Recurrence Score (RS): The assay provides a score on a scale, typically interpreted in bands such as RS 0-10, RS 11-15, RS 16-20, RS 21-25, RS 26-100.

    • Example data (for RS 26-100, all ages): Shows an absolute chemotherapy (CT) benefit of approximately 32%32\%\%; distant recurrence risk with Tamoxifen (Tam) alone is 20%20\%\%

    • Gene components: Includes genes like Estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, Ki-67, GRB7, STK15, BC12, Survivin, BAG1, among others (total 21 genes, with 16 relevant to breast cancer in the assay).

  • Breast Cancer Prevention

    • Molecular markers: Can indicate risk before symptoms, guiding preventive actions.

    • Preventive steps: Include lifestyle modifications, increased mammography surveillance, elective surgery, and chemoprevention.

    • Angelina Jolie example: Her high BRCA mutation risk led to bilateral mastectomy and oophorectomy due to estimated risks (breast 90%\sim 90\%, ovarian 60%\sim 60\%).

  • Cost of Healthcare and Case Study

    • Increased efficiency: Personalised medicine can reduce healthcare costs by minimizing trial-and-error dosing, decreasing hospitalizations due to ADRs, and avoiding late diagnoses and reactive treatments.

    • Case study (Epstein et al., 2010): Reported 31%31\%\%

    • Fewer hospitalizations overall for warfarin dosing: With up to 48%48\%\%

    • Fewer hospitalizations for bleeding or thromboembolism.

  • Barriers to Personalised Medicine

    • Costs: High expenses associated with diagnostic tests and potentially treatments.

    • Guideline adoption: Challenges in integrating personalised medicine into established guidelines from bodies like NICE (UK) and FDA (USA).

    • Knowledge and understanding: Gaps in knowledge among medical professionals and patients.

    • Data requirements: Requires massive data integration from genomic, transcriptomic, and microbiomic sources.

  • How Personalised Medicine Offers Better Health Outcomes (Revisited)

    • Key benefits: Reinforces prevention via early detection, selection of optimal therapy to reduce trial-and-error, decreased ADRs, increased patient adherence, improved quality of life, identification of new uses for medicines, and more cost-effective healthcare.

  • Drug Repurposing (Drug Repositioning)

    • Definition: The process of identifying new therapeutic uses for existing or available drugs.

    • Bases: Relies on the understanding that diseases often share common biological targets and that pleiotropic drugs can affect multiple biochemical pathways.

  • Drug Repurposing Examples (Common Examples Table)

    • Aspirin: Originally an analgesic; new indication includes colorectal cancer (CRC).

    • Azathioprine: Originally for rheumatoid arthritis; new indication for renal transplant.

    • Cycloserine: Originally for tuberculosis; new indication for depression.

    • Duloxetine: Originally for depression; new indication for stress urinary incontinence.

    • Galantamine: Originally for polio-related paralysis; new indication for Alzheimer's disease.

    • Gemcitabine: Originally an antiviral; new indication for cancer.

    • Finasteride: Originally for benign prostatic hyperplasia; new indication for hair loss.

    • Imatinib: Originally for chronic myelogenous leukemia; new indication for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

    • Sildenafil: Originally for angina; new indications for erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

    • Thalidomide: Originally a sedative/antiemetic with teratogenicity concerns; repositioned for leprosy complications, then multiple myeloma, and potentially for COVID-19.

    • Zidovudine: Originally for HIV/AIDS; new indication for cancer.

    • Benefits: Drug repurposing can shorten development time, reduce costs, and extend the utility of shelved drugs to new patient populations.

  • Drug Repurposing – Aspirin (Details)

    • History: Marketed by Bayer in 1899 as an analgesic; repositioned in the 1980s at a low-dose as an anti-platelet agent for cardiovascular prevention.

    • Potential oncology role: May prevent the development of CRC through anti-platelet activity.

    • Mechanisms: Includes reduced platelet-tumor interactions, suppression of PGE2PGE2 in tumor cells, and roles of COX1COX-1 and COX2COX-2 enzymes, leading to PGE2PGE2 reduction and effects on angiogenesis.

  • Drug Repurposing – Thalidomide (History and Repurposing)

    • History: Banned by WHO in 1962 due to teratogenicity.

    • Repositioned: In 1998 for leprosy complications through TNFαTNF-\alpha inhibition; later, in 2006, as a first-line treatment for multiple myeloma.

    • Potential: Under consideration for severe COVID-19 cases.

    • Term: Often categorized with orphan drug status, used to treat rare diseases with government support.

  • Drug Repurposing – Sildenafil (Viagra)

    • Initial investigation: Initially studied for hypertension and angina.

    • Unexpected side effect: Observation of penile erections during trials led to its repositioning as Viagra leading to sales exceeding 22 billion annually.

    • Further repositioning: Subsequently used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at a lower dose.

  • Anastrozole (Recent Repurposing Example)

    • IBIS-II study: Demonstrated that anastrozole reduces long-term breast cancer rates in high-risk postmenopausal women.

    • Recommendation: Suggested as a preventive drug-of-choice over tamoxifen in some guidelines.

    • Impact: A 2019 QMUL announcement indicated nearly 300,000300,000 women in England would be offered the drug to reduce breast cancer risk.

  • Drug Repurposing in Cancer: Targets and Benefits

    • Targets: Focuses on inhibiting tumor invasion & metastasis and implementing anti-angiogenesis strategies.

    • Examples: Includes compounds like Niclosamide, Minocycline, Esoteric EGFR antagonists, Bisphosphonates (Zoledronic Acid), Itraconazole, Curcumin, Ivermectin, Ritonavir, Doxycycline, Statins, Metformin, and Leflunomide, among others.

    • Benefits: Leads to reduced costs, faster development timelines, broadened patient access, and provides an opportunity to market shelved drugs.

    • Concept: Synergy between combination therapy and personalised medicine.

  • Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing

    • Accessibility: DNA sequencing is now cheap and fast, though data interpretation remains challenging.

    • Companies: Many companies offer personal genome analysis (e.g., 23andMe).

    • Example offerings: 23andMe provides risk assessments for late-onset Alzheimer’s and certain BRCA mutations (some FDA-approved).

    • Consumer marketing: Includes at-home genetic test packs offering multiple reports (ancestry, nutrigenetics, pharmacogenetics, etc.).

    • Price points (example): A 7-report bundle advertised at £399.00£399.00, discounted to £299.00£299.00.

  • Points to Consider for DTC Genetic Testing

    • Ethical, economic, legal, and social issues: These are central considerations.

    • Integration: The challenge of integrating personal/family medical history with traditional tests and genomics for medical decisions.

    • Validity of risk: Assessing the validity of risks associated with SNPs or mutations.

    • Ownership of DNA: Legal considerations regarding the ownership and use of samples and data after collection.

    • Role of genetic counselling: The importance of professional guidance in interpreting results.

  • Genetic Testing: Ethical Considerations (Who Cares About Your Genome?)

    • Potential interested parties: Family, spouse, doctors, government, police, schools, and insurance companies.

    • Key questions: Do meaningful interventions exist from this information? Is there potential for discrimination based on genetic data?

  • Ethical Debate Prompts (Self-directed Work)

    • Government agencies: Should patients’ DNA sequences be held by government agencies?

    • Selective termination: Should doctors make decisions on selective termination based on genetic information?

    • Patent mutations: Should drug discovery companies be allowed to patent novel mutations identified during drug discovery efforts?

    • Incidental findings: Should all incidental findings be disclosed to patients when performing personal genome analysis?

  • Practical Notes and References

    • Abbreviations used: ER (Estrogen Receptor), PR (Progesterone Receptor), HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), CK (Cytokeratin), Ki-67 (a marker for cell proliferation), CT (Chemotherapy), ADR (Adverse Drug Reaction).

    • Key sources cited: Include NICE, Genomics England, NEJM (New England Journal of Medicine), Lancet, Mol Oncol (Molecular Oncology), and various government reports.

    • Emphasis: Throughout the expansion of personalised medicine, ethical, social, and economic considerations are emphasized as