History & Composition of Fingerprints – Comprehensive Lecture Notes
Quick Review: Powdering & Lifting Fingerprints
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
- Gloves are mandatory; masks recommended (powder can become airborne).
- Operate inside a fume hood; no food or drink in the lab (Health & Safety compliance).
Powdering Basics
- Definition: Applying finely-ground, coloured powder to a non-porous surface to make latent prints visible.
- Powder adheres to moisture, oils, and other fingerprint residues.
- Common brush types:
- Fiberglass filament brush
- Camel-hair brush
- Feather duster
Application Technique
- Deposit small amount of powder, then gently brush.
- Move the brush with the direction of emerging ridges.
- Stop when the print reaches optimal clarity—“over-powdering” obscures detail.
Marking Developed Prints
- Circle print with wax pencil / dry-erase marker.
- Label sequentially: R1, R2, …; add directional arrow if helpful.
- Include date & initials.
- Place scale near (not touching) the print after the first photographs.
- Lightly powder the scale and writing to keep overall exposure consistent in photographs.
Photography Sequence
- Overall shot → mid-range → close-up → close-up with scale (all on the same focal plane).
Lifting Procedure
- Use hinge lifter or fingerprint tape.
- Anchor the tape’s leading edge ahead of the print, apply even downward pressure, advance to cover the ridge detail.
- Peel back smoothly, avoiding creases, and mount on a lift card.
- Complete the lift card: case details, sketch of print location.
Historical Milestones in Fingerprints
Ancient & Medieval
- China: fingerprints as proof of identity.
- Japan: documented use.
- Qin Dynasty (≈): handprints used in burglary cases.
17th–18th Centuries
- Dr. Nehemiah Grew (1684): first European microscopic description of friction-ridge skin.
- Marcello Malpighi (1687): ridges increase skin–object friction.
- Dr. J. C. A. Mayer (1788): first to declare ridge patterns unique.
19th Century
- Dr. Jan Purkinje (1823): classified fingerprints into nine pattern types—precursor to the Henry system.
- Sir William Herschel (1858, India):
- Right-hand print used as a contract signature (Rajyadhar Konai).
- Demonstrated print persistence across 57 years (samples: ).
- Dr. Henry Faulds (1880): journal article advocating evidentiary value; urged police adoption.
- Anthropometry (Alphonse Bertillon, 1882): body-measure identification—later supplanted by fingerprints.
- Dr. Arthur Kollman (late 1800s): fetal ridge formation, identified volar pads (visible by 4ᵗʰ fetal month; complete by 6ᵗʰ).
- Sir Francis Galton (1892):
- Book “Finger Prints”; proved uniqueness & permanence.
- Named minutiae (“Galton details”).
- Promoted fingerprints over Bertillonage (1888).
Global Systems & First Cases
- Juan Vucetich (1891, Argentina): devised own classification; enabled card filing/searching.
- Rojas Murders, 1892 (Argentina): first homicide solved solely with fingerprint evidence; nation adopted fingerprint identification.
- Henry Classification System (1897, India/England): created by Azizul Haque & Hem Chandra Bose; supervisor – Edward Henry.
- Belper Committee (1900): England decides to classify all criminal records by fingerprints; Henry system becomes standard.
North American Adoption
- USA: New York State Civil Service Commission—first systematic government use.
- Canada:
- Edward Foster (Dominion Police) exposed to Scotland Yard lecture; lobbied for adoption.
- Order-in-Council under Identification of Criminals Act legalizes prints; Bertillon system phased out by .
- National Fingerprint Bureau (RCMP) opens with sets; photography sanctioned the same year.
- First Canadian conviction via fingerprints (Petawawa, ON).
- OPP Identification Bureau formed.
- Kejimkujik Petroglyphs (Nova Scotia): oldest N. American depiction of friction ridges & flexion creases (anthropological significance).
20th-Century Scientific Advances
- Wilder & Wentworth (1918): book integrates law enforcement & science; validates third-level detail (pores, ridge edges, scars).
- Dr. Harold Cummins (1943): volar pad regression aligns with ridge development; pad size/position influences patterns.
- Dr. Alfred Hale (1952): fetal cross-sections; detailed ridge formation & differential growth.
- Salil Kumar Chatterjee (1962): “Edgeoscopy” – ridge edge shapes for identification.
- Dr. M. Okajima (1976): studied incipient ridges (immature, thin ridges).
Structure & Function of Skin
General Skin Functions
- Container for skeletal structures & organs.
- Sensory input: temperature, texture, pain.
- Waste elimination & thermoregulation via sweating (salts, amino acids, ammonia, urea).
Friction Ridge Skin (Hands & Feet)
- Ridges + pores enhance grip.
- Flexion creases allow movement.
Quantitative Facts
- Total body skin ≈ ; only is friction skin.
- Thickness rarely > ; thickest on palms/soles.
Skin Layers
Epidermis (outer barrier; continuous cell turnover)
- Five strata (deep → superficial):
- Stratum Basale (generating layer; melanocytes produce melanin).
- Stratum Spinosum (flexibility, UV protection).
- Stratum Granulosum (waterproof barrier).
- Stratum Lucidum (stretch & cell degeneration).
- Stratum Corneum (dead cells; external “dust”).
- Complete cell migration cycle ≈ (basale → corneum).
Dermis (supportive connective tissue)
- Two sub-layers: papillary (outer) & reticular (inner).
- Houses nerves, blood vessels, sebaceous & sweat glands.
- Contributes to touch perception & temperature regulation.
Sweat Glands
Humans possess glands.
Density on palms/soles: .
Types & Roles
- Eccrine (entire body; only appendage in friction skin)
- Simple tubular; ducts exit at ridge pores.
- Secrete water + electrolytes for cooling.
- Group-functioning; larger & more active on palms/soles.
- Apocrine (hairy regions; oily secretion; emotional stimuli—anxiety, fear).
- Apoeccrine (discovered ; hybrid; watery secretion; develops at puberty).
Fingerprint Residue Composition
- water.
- organic & inorganic salts, amino acids, lipids.
- Residue chemistry changes as water evaporates → necessity for multiple development techniques.
- Probability of successful development ∝ (inverse relationship).
Biological Variability & Permanence
Injury & Healing
- Damage limited to epidermis → identical ridge pattern after regrowth.
- If the generating layer (Stratum Basale blueprint) is damaged, new pattern forms.
- Dermal injuries produce scars—permanent, unique third-level detail.
- Scar features vary with deposition pressure/movement; they appear as voids or distortions in impressions.
Wound-Healing Phases
- Inflammation
- Proliferation/Tissue Formation
- Remodeling
Creases vs. Scars
- Creases may develop from environment, diet, age; presence varies among individuals.
- Must not be misinterpreted as scars; note but do not base identification solely on creases.
Aging Effects
- Surface ridges flatten ⇒ less pronounced in impressions.
- Dermal elasticity loss ⇒ skin becomes flaccid & wrinkles form.
- Wrinkles: dermal changes reduce stretchability & resilience.
Incipient Ridges
- Undeveloped, narrow, “rudimentary” ridges.
- Excluded from classification, yet can aid identification if present in both questioned & known prints.
Key Takeaways & Practical Implications
Fingerprint identification rests on three foundational principles:
- Uniqueness (no two prints identical; established by Mayer, Galton).
- Permanence (persistence over a lifetime; demonstrated by Herschel).
- Classifiability (Henry, Vucetich systems allow efficient filing & retrieval).
Modern science validates not only overall ridge flow (level 1) and minutiae (level 2) but also pores, edges, scars (level 3) as unique & permanent.
Successful latent print recovery depends on:
- Timely scene processing (residue evaporation).
- Proper powdering technique (avoid over-application).
- Accurate documentation (photos, lift cards, sequential labeling).
- Health & safety adherence in the lab.
Ethical/Legal Context:
- Shift from Bertillon measurements to fingerprints reflected quest for more reliable, science-based identification.
- Early cases (Rojas murders, Petawawa conviction) established forensic precedent for courtroom acceptance.
Research fronts continue (edgeoscopy, incipient ridge studies) to refine comparison criteria, bolstering both accuracy and admissibility.