Intellect and Intellectual Differences
Neuropsychological Domains: Intellect
Introduction
- Focus on the neuropsychological domain of intellect within SPED 2110.
- Intellect is a distinct type of brain function used to execute behaviors.
Defining Intellect
- Intellect: ability to solve problems, often defined as academic ability or potential.
- Key words: ability and potential.
- Separate from academic performance.
Causes of Differences in Intellect
- Genetics
- Correlation between parent IQ and child IQ.
- Specific genetic disorders: Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome.
- Medical Considerations
- During pregnancy: drug/alcohol/tobacco use, malnutrition, environmental toxins, illnesses.
- During the birthing process: birth injuries, lack of oxygen.
- After birth: meningitis, exposure to environmental toxins, head trauma, drowning.
- Systematic issues: poverty, cultural deprivation, under stimulation.
Types of Intellectual Differences
- Gifted students.
- Students with developmental disorders (intellectual disabilities, multiple disabilities).
- Individuals with traumatic brain injury (potential impact).
- Videos illustrating intellectual differences:
- Young woman with an intellectual disability.
- Group of students identified as gifted.
- Students pursuing college with intellectual differences.
IQ Tests: History and Implications
- IQ tests as a data point in identifying intellectual differences.
- Problematic history: awareness of historical implications is crucial.
- 1905: Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon designed a test for children struggling in school in France.
- Designed to determine which children required individualized attention, their method formed the basis of the IQ test.
- Researchers hypothesized that cognitive abilities like verbal reasoning, working memory, and visual spatial skills reflected an underlying general intelligence, or g factor.
- Simon and Binet designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities, and combine the results into a single score.
- IQ=(MentalAge/ChronologicalAge)∗100
- Today, a score of 100 represents the average of a sample population, with 68% of the population scoring within 15 points of 100.
- Evolution of IQ Testing:
- Initially for academic help, later used to sort people based on flawed ideologies.
- World War I: used by the military to sort recruits, influenced by eugenics.
- Eugenics: belief in controlling human traits through selective breeding.
- Erroneous claims of racial intellectual superiority.
- 1924: Virginia policy allowing forced sterilization based on low IQ scores, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Nazi Germany: authorized the murder of children based on low IQ.
- Post-Holocaust and Civil Rights Movement: discriminatory uses challenged.
- Environmental impacts on IQ: Flynn effect (rising scores due to better education, healthcare, nutrition).
- Mid-twentieth century: attempts to use IQ tests to evaluate psychiatric conditions.
- Today: better techniques to identify bias, used to identify intellectual disability and determine support.
- IQ tests measure reasoning and problem-solving skills but don't fully reflect a person's potential.
- Researchers reject categorizing individuals by a single numerical score.
- Professional obligation: be aware of the historic uses of tools like IQ tests.
- IQ tests were used to perpetuate dangerous racist policies.
Interventions for Intellectual Differences
- Resources for interventions are in the module for intellect resources document.
- Types of chaining (similar to task analysis):
- Total task chaining.
- Forward chaining.
- Backward chaining.
- Prompt types:
- Prompt fading.
- Least to most prompting.
- Most to least prompting.
- Graduated guidance for fine motor tasks.
- Considering least restrictive environment: continuum from least to most restrictive.
- General education setting or special education classroom.
- More restrictive settings only if necessary for safety, development, and curriculum access.
- Repetition and modeling: teaching is not telling.
- Explaining, modeling, practicing with support.
- Reinforcement for correct completion or near-correct completion.
- Corrective feedback if the skill is not performed correctly.
Interventions for Students with High Cognitive Abilities (Gifted)
- Strategies for differentiating instruction:
- Enrichment: presenting curricular content with more depth, breadth, complexity, or abstractness.
- Acceleration: presenting curricular content earlier or at a faster pace.
- Content acceleration.
- Skipping a grade.
- Advanced placement programs.
- College courses in high school.
- Early graduation or college entrance.
- Choice based on individual student needs.
- Curriculum compacting: instructional technique to adjust curricular adjustments for students.
- Defining goals and outcomes.
- Determining mastered learning outcomes.
- Replacement strategies.
- Organized common sense approach.
- Steps for carrying out curriculum compacting applicable to basic skills and content areas.
Conclusion
- Explore the resources on the resource page.
- Complete the exit ticket.