Intellect and Intellectual Differences

Neuropsychological Domains: Intellect

Introduction

  • Focus on the neuropsychological domain of intellect within SPED 2110.
  • Intellect is a distinct type of brain function used to execute behaviors.

Defining Intellect

  • Intellect: ability to solve problems, often defined as academic ability or potential.
  • Key words: ability and potential.
  • Separate from academic performance.

Causes of Differences in Intellect

  • Genetics
    • Correlation between parent IQ and child IQ.
    • Specific genetic disorders: Down syndrome, Fragile X syndrome.
  • Medical Considerations
    • During pregnancy: drug/alcohol/tobacco use, malnutrition, environmental toxins, illnesses.
    • During the birthing process: birth injuries, lack of oxygen.
    • After birth: meningitis, exposure to environmental toxins, head trauma, drowning.
    • Systematic issues: poverty, cultural deprivation, under stimulation.

Types of Intellectual Differences

  • Gifted students.
  • Students with developmental disorders (intellectual disabilities, multiple disabilities).
  • Individuals with traumatic brain injury (potential impact).

Resources for Module Four

  • Videos illustrating intellectual differences:
    • Young woman with an intellectual disability.
    • Group of students identified as gifted.
    • Students pursuing college with intellectual differences.

IQ Tests: History and Implications

  • IQ tests as a data point in identifying intellectual differences.
  • Problematic history: awareness of historical implications is crucial.
  • 1905: Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon designed a test for children struggling in school in France.
    • Designed to determine which children required individualized attention, their method formed the basis of the IQ test.
  • Researchers hypothesized that cognitive abilities like verbal reasoning, working memory, and visual spatial skills reflected an underlying general intelligence, or g factor.
  • Simon and Binet designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities, and combine the results into a single score.
  • IQ=(MentalAge/ChronologicalAge)100IQ = (Mental Age / Chronological Age) * 100
  • Today, a score of 100 represents the average of a sample population, with 68% of the population scoring within 15 points of 100.
  • Evolution of IQ Testing:
    • Initially for academic help, later used to sort people based on flawed ideologies.
    • World War I: used by the military to sort recruits, influenced by eugenics.
    • Eugenics: belief in controlling human traits through selective breeding.
    • Erroneous claims of racial intellectual superiority.
    • 1924: Virginia policy allowing forced sterilization based on low IQ scores, upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
    • Nazi Germany: authorized the murder of children based on low IQ.
    • Post-Holocaust and Civil Rights Movement: discriminatory uses challenged.
    • Environmental impacts on IQ: Flynn effect (rising scores due to better education, healthcare, nutrition).
    • Mid-twentieth century: attempts to use IQ tests to evaluate psychiatric conditions.
    • Today: better techniques to identify bias, used to identify intellectual disability and determine support.
  • IQ tests measure reasoning and problem-solving skills but don't fully reflect a person's potential.
  • Researchers reject categorizing individuals by a single numerical score.
  • Professional obligation: be aware of the historic uses of tools like IQ tests.
  • IQ tests were used to perpetuate dangerous racist policies.

Interventions for Intellectual Differences

  • Resources for interventions are in the module for intellect resources document.
  • Types of chaining (similar to task analysis):
    • Total task chaining.
    • Forward chaining.
    • Backward chaining.
  • Prompt types:
    • Prompt fading.
    • Least to most prompting.
    • Most to least prompting.
    • Graduated guidance for fine motor tasks.
  • Considering least restrictive environment: continuum from least to most restrictive.
    • General education setting or special education classroom.
    • More restrictive settings only if necessary for safety, development, and curriculum access.
  • Repetition and modeling: teaching is not telling.
    • Explaining, modeling, practicing with support.
    • Reinforcement for correct completion or near-correct completion.
    • Corrective feedback if the skill is not performed correctly.

Interventions for Students with High Cognitive Abilities (Gifted)

  • Strategies for differentiating instruction:
    • Enrichment: presenting curricular content with more depth, breadth, complexity, or abstractness.
    • Acceleration: presenting curricular content earlier or at a faster pace.
      • Content acceleration.
      • Skipping a grade.
      • Advanced placement programs.
      • College courses in high school.
      • Early graduation or college entrance.
      • Choice based on individual student needs.
  • Curriculum compacting: instructional technique to adjust curricular adjustments for students.
    • Defining goals and outcomes.
    • Determining mastered learning outcomes.
    • Replacement strategies.
    • Organized common sense approach.
    • Steps for carrying out curriculum compacting applicable to basic skills and content areas.

Conclusion

  • Explore the resources on the resource page.
  • Complete the exit ticket.