FORMS OF PETTY VIOLENCE- The Nature and Circumstances of Masculine and Feminine Assaults
Chapter 5: Forms of Petty Violence: The Nature and Circumstances of Masculine and Feminine Assaults
Introduction to Petty Violence
Examination of petty violence in early 18th-century London.
Analysis of assault prosecutions to identify general patterns related to gender and culture.
Distinction between socially acceptable forms of violence and those perceived as violations.
Understanding Violence vs. Violation
Alexandra Shepard’s Concept: Differentiates violence (socially acceptable) and violation (prosecutable).
Forms of physical aggression by authority figures seen as normative.
Only excessive or status-disparate violence recognized legally as violation.
Assaults needed to align with societal norms to be legal.
Gender Dynamics in Assault Prosecutions
Husband vs. Wife Prosecutions: Extremely few husbands accused their wives, indicating social biases.
Assumptions about gender roles influenced the prosecution of assaults.
Acknowledgment of women's capacity for violence challenges traditional views of it being masculine.
One-third of all assault prosecutions involved female defendants, suggesting prevalent female aggression.
Patterns of Assault Types
Basic Forms of Assault:
Common actions: kicking, scratching, use of threats.
Men and women employed similar methods, but differences existed in motivations and physical actions.
Humiliation Tactics:
Specific assault tactics aimed at humiliating victims (e.g., skirt lifting or dewigging).
Public ridicule through tearing clothes or exposing body parts as a method of shaming.
Contexts and Locations of Violence
Geographic Analysis: Certain parts of London seen as more dangerous (e.g., highways versus private homes).
Societal fears surrounding women's presence in public after dark mirrored fears of violence.
Many assaults originated from disputes related to money, alcohol, or neighborhood tensions.
Comparison of Gendered Assault Dynamics
Both genders targeted their own sex more frequently for assaults.
Women particularly relied on hand-based attacks (striking) versus foot attacks (kicking), which were less common.
Instances of violence using domestic items as weapons (e.g., kitchen tools for women).
Threats and Psychological Warfare
Verbal threats were common tools of both male and female assailants.
Graphic threats by women matched or rivaled those of men, showcasing a disturbing equality in aggression.
Intent to humiliate was pronounced in many recorded recognizances.
Symbolism and Public Perception
Actions such as ducking or throwing filth were acts of humiliation available to both genders.
Public assaults often had both personal and communal implications.
Assaults in taverns or public markets were a common arena for disputes.
Conclusion on Gendered Violence in London (1680-1720)
Violence in this period must be interpreted against a backdrop of complexity in gender roles.
Both men and women demonstrated potential for violence, often reflecting societal norms of humiliation and aggression.
Local context and public perceptions layered over personal motivations to shape incidents of petty violence.