Financial Analysis Notes
Importance of Ratio Analysis
- Ratios serve as a measurement tool to evaluate a firm's performance.
- DuPont analysis system helps in understanding the factors driving return on equity.
- Trend analysis provides insights into a company's performance over time.
- Ratios are used to evaluate operating performance, compare against industry peers, and assess management and facilities.
Ratio Analysis
- Financial ratios are crucial for evaluating a firm's operating performance.
- Analysis involves numerical calculations and comparisons against similar firms in the industry.
- Additional evaluations consider company management, physical facilities, and other relevant factors.
- Various organizations provide data for ratio analysis.
Ratios and Their Classification
- Profitability ratios:
- Profit margin
- Return on assets (investment)
- Return on equity
- Asset-utilization ratios:
- Receivable turnover
- Average collection period
- Inventory turnover
- Fixed asset turnover
- Total asset turnover
- Liquidity ratios:
- Current ratio
- Quick ratio
- Debt-utilization ratios:
- Debt to total assets
- Times interest earned
- Fixed charge coverage
Types of Ratios
- Profitability ratios measure a firm’s ability to earn an adequate return on sales, assets, and invested capital.
- Asset-utilization ratios measure the speed at which a firm turns over accounts receivable, inventory, and long-term assets.
- Liquidity ratios emphasize a firm’s ability to pay off short-term obligations as they come due.
- Debt-utilization ratios estimate the overall debt position of a firm and are evaluated in light of the asset base and earning power.
Importance of Ratios to Financial Statement Users
- Potential investors/security analysts:
- Primary consideration: profitability ratios
- Secondary considerations: liquidity and debt utilization
- Bankers or trade creditors: liquidity ratios
- Long-term creditors: debt utilization ratios and profitability ratios
Financial Statement for Ratio Analysis
- Income Statement (For the Year Ended December 31, 2013):
- Sales (all on credit):
- Cost of goods sold:
- Gross profit:
- Selling and administrative expense (includes in lease payments):
- Operating profit:
- Interest expense:
- Extraordinary loss:
- Net income before taxes:
- Taxes (33%):
- Net income:
- Balance Sheet (As of December 31, 2013):
- Assets:
- Cash:
- Marketable securities:
- Accounts receivable:
- Inventory:
- Total current assets:
- Net plant and equipment:
- Net assets:
- Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
- Accounts payable:
- Notes payable:
- Total current liabilities:
- Long-term liabilities:
- Total liabilities:
- Common stock:
- Retained earnings:
- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity:
- Assets:
Profitability Ratios
- Profit margin
- Saxton Company: \frac{$200,000}{$4,000,000} = 5\%, Industry Average: 6.7%
- Return on assets (investment)
- Saxton Company: \frac{$200,000}{$1,600,000} = 12.5\%, Industry Average: 10%
- DuPont System of Analysis: Return on assets (investment) = Profit margin × Asset turnover , . This illustrates how return on assets is a function of both the profit margin and asset turnover.
- Return on equity
- Saxton Company: \frac{$200,000}{$1,000,000} = 20\%, Industry Average: 15%
- Return on equity
- Saxton Company: , Industry Average: .
DuPont System of Analysis
- Satisfactory return on assets can be derived through:
- High profit margin
- Rapid asset turnover (generating more sales per dollar of assets)
- Combination of both
- Return on assets (investment) = Profit margin × Asset turnover
- Satisfactory return on equity can be derived through:
- High return on total assets
- Generous utilization of debt
- Combination of both
- Return on equity = Return on assets (investment) / (1 – Debt/Assets)
- Net income / Sales X Sales / Total assets = return on assets
- Return on assets / (1-Total debt / Total assets) = Return on Equity
Wal-Mart vs. Abercrombie, Du Pont Analysis
| Name | Profit Margin (A) | Asset Turnover (B) | Return on Assets (A × B) | Debt/ Assets (C) | 1- Debt/Assets (D = (1 - C)) | Return on Equity ((A × B)/D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walmart | 3.5% | 2.4 | 8.3% | 63.1% | 36.9% | 22.4% |
| American Eagle Outfitters | 4.8% | 1.7 | 8.3% | 27.4% | 72.6% | 11.5% |
Asset Utilization Ratios
- Relate balance sheet (assets) to income statement (sales).
- Note: Inventory turnover ratio may also be computed by using “cost of goods sold” in the numerator.
Asset Utlization Ratios: Calculations and Comparison
- Fixed asset turnover
- Saxton Company: \frac{$4,000,000}{$800,000} = 5 times, Industry Average: 5.4 times
- Total asset turnover
- Saxton Company: \frac{$4,000,000}{$1,600,000} = 2.5 times, Industry Average: 1.5 times
Liquidity Ratios
- These ratios determine if the firm can meet each maturing obligation as it comes due.
Debt Utilization Ratios
- Measures the prudence of the debt management policies of the firm.
Debt Utlization Ratios: Fixed Charge Coverage Measurement
- Fixed charge coverage measures the firm’s ability to meet all fixed obligations rather than interest payments alone.
- Income before interest and taxes: 50,000
- Income before fixed charges and taxes: $$600,000
Ratio Analysis - Saxton Company
| Ratio | Saxton Company | Industry Average | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Profitability | |||
| 1. Profit margin | 5.0% | 6.7% | Below average |
| 2. Return on assets | 12.5% | 10.0% | Above average due to turnover |
| 3. Return on equity | 20.0% | 15.0% | Good, due to Ratios 2 |
| B. Asset Utilization | |||
| 4. Receivables turnover | 11.4 | 10.0 | Good |
| 5. Average collection period | 32.0 | 36.0 | Good |
| 6. Inventory turnover | 10.8 | 7.0 | Good |
| 7. Fixed asset turnover | 5.0 | 5.4 | Below average |
| 8. Total asset turnover | 2.5 | 1.5 | Good |
| C. Liquidity | |||
| 9. Current ratio | 2.67 | 2.1 | Good |
| 10. Quick ratio | 1.43 | 1.0 | Good |
| D. Debt Utilization | |||
| 11. Debt to total assets | 37.5% | 33.0% | Slightly more debt |
| 12. Times interest earned | 11.0 | 7.0 | Good |
| 13. Fixed charge coverage | 6.0 | 5.5 | Good |
Trend Analysis
- Gives picture of performance over number of years against industry averages.
Trend Analysis Example in the Computer Industry
| IBM | Dell | Apple | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | Return on Equity | Profit Margin | |
| 1988 | 9.7 | 14.9 | 5.6 |
| 1989 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 1.3 |
| 1990 | 8.7 | 14.8 | 5.0 |
| 1991 | -4.4 | -7.2 | 5.7 |
| 1992 | -7.7 | -15.4 | 5.0 |
| 1993 | -12.9 | -35.2 | -1.2 |
| 1994 | 4.7 | 14.3 | 4.3 |
| 1995 | 5.8 | 18.5 | 5.1 |
| 1996 | 7.1 | 24.8 | 6.7 |
| 1997 | 7.8 | 29.7 | 7.7 |
| 1998 | 7.7 | 32.6 | 8.0 |
| 1999 | 8.8 | 39.0 | 6.6 |
| 2000 | 9.2 | 39.7 | 6.8 |
| 2001 | 9.3 | 35.2 | 4.0 |
| 2002 | 4.4 | 15.5 | 6.0 |
| 2003 | 8.5 | 29.9 | 6.4 |
| 2004 | 7.8 | 25.1 | 6.2 |
| 2005 | 8.7 | 24.5 | 6.5 |
| 2006 | 10.4 | 30.8 | 4.5 |
| 2007 | 10.5 | 36.6 | 4.8 |
| 2008 | 11.9 | 58.8 | 4.1 |
| 2009 | 14.0 | 74.4 | 2.7 |
| 2010 | 14.9 | 64.9 | 4.3 |
| 2011 | 14.8 | 73.4 | 5.6 |
| 2012 (est.) | 15.8 | 70.5 | 4.8 |