Encourage reviewing study guides posted in this week's module.
Fill in from memory to reinforce learning; it contributes to the 50% exam portion of the grade.
Issue with unassigned essays being sorted out; scores will be adjusted accordingly.
Definition of Attitude: A learned tendency to respond to an object, person, or issue in a specific way.
Attitudes can be:
Positive: Favorable evaluations.
Negative: Unfavorable evaluations.
Ambivalent: Mixed feelings, unsure which outweighs the other.
There are three major components to every attitude:
Cognitive Component: Thoughts and beliefs about the topic (mental aspects).
Example: Jill believes fast food availability discourages healthier eating.
Affective Component: Emotions and feelings towards the topic.
Example: Jill finds fast food disgusting and hates greasy fries and fake milkshakes.
Behavioral Component: Actions reflecting the attitude.
Example: Jill organizes a petition against a new fast food restaurant.
Anticipated Outcomes: Likelihood of favorable responses from others based on the attitude.
Extremity and Expression of Attitudes: The more extreme or frequently expressed the attitude, the more likely individuals will act in accordance with it.
Direct Experience: Attitudes formed through direct experiences lead to consistent behavior.
Knowledge on the Subject: Greater knowledge results in consistent attitudes and behavior.
Vested Interest: Personal stakes in the subject increase likelihood of behavior aligning with attitudes.
Definition: Unpleasant psychological tension (dissonance) arises when two thoughts or behaviors are inconsistent.
Example: A smoker recognizes that smoking is unhealthy but continues to smoke—experiences cognitive dissonance.
Resolution Strategies:
Change Behavior: Quit smoking to align with the attitude of wanting to be healthy.
Change Attitude: Rationalize behavior, such as believing enjoyment of smoking outweighs health concerns.
Research on cognitive dissonance originated with Leon Festinger in the 1950s.
Study of cognitive dissonance explored how people resolve discomfort from conflicting thoughts and behaviors.
Follow-up examples often introduced by other psychologists, such as Philip Zimbardo, provide insights on the implications of dissonance in social psychology.