Occupiers liability
Liability is on occupier to lawful visitors under Occupiers
Liability Act. 1957 (OLA 57)S2(1) OLA 1957 states that occupiers of premises owe a common duty of care to visitors
Define occupier anyone with a degree of control over the premises in question"
Wheat V Lacon - sufficient control test
Apply.
Define premises "fixed or moveable structure inc vessels, vehicles, aircrafts and gardens" s1(3) (a) apply must state if fixed or moveable structure
Define visitor "anyone invited or permitted to be on the premises via implied or expressed permission"
Apply must state if expressed or implied permissionCommon Duty of Care (CDoC) S2(2) -"a duty to take such care as is reasonable in all circumstances to ensure the visitor is reasonably safe for the purpose of their visit" CDoC is only applicable when injury is due to state of the premises and not the activities of the visitor
Darby V Natzonal Trust
Injury must be due to the state of the premises
Marten Y Middlesbrough Council
Apply why are they there and is it safe for the specificDefine premises “fixed or moveable structure inc vessels,
vehicles, aircrafts and gardens” s1(3)(a) apply must state if
fixed or moveable structure.
5. Define visitor “anyone invited or permitted to be on the
premises via implied or expressed permission”
Apply must state if expressed or implied permission
6. Common Duty of Care (CDoC) S2(2)-“a duty to take such care as
is reasonable in all circumstances to ensure the visitor is
reasonably safe for the purpose of their visit” CDoC is only
applicable when injury is due to state of the premises and not
the activities of the visitor
Darby V National Trust
Injury must be due to the state of the premises
Martin V Middlesbrough Council
Apply why are they there and is it safe for the specific
visit?
7. O.I.R.
-Duty owed to children S2(3)(a)-Occupiers must be aware of
and guard against dangers to children and expect them to be
less careful than adults.
Occupiers must guard against any allurement that may tempt
child visitors into danger or put them at risk of injury.
Glasgow Corp V Taylor
Foreseeable allurement must be removed
Jolly V Sutton Council
Very young children (6 below) must remain supervised by
parents.
Phipps V Rochester
Apply
8. O.I.R.
-Duty owed to experts S2(3)(b)-occupier may expect a
specialist visitor to guard against risks within their own
specialism
Role V Nathan
-States that the occupier is not liable for risks “within the
exercise of their calling” or things related to the work.
Apply
9. Negligence of independent contractors S2(4)(b)- occupier of
premises will not be liable for injuries/ damages suffered by
visitors when the cause of damage is due to negligence of I.C
● 3 conditions must be satisfied for I.C to be liable.
○ 1. Must be reasonable for occupier to entrust the work to the Independent contractor - the more complicated and specialist the work, the more likely for the occupier to have given the work to a specialist.
Haseldine V Daw
Apply
○ 2. Occupier must take reasonable steps to satisfy themselves that the I.C is the competent
Apply
○ 3. Occupier must check the work has been properly done. More complex the task the less reasonable it is to expect this
Apply
10. Conclusion- is the owner liable for the injuries/ damages suffered?
11. Defences
● Warnings S2(4)- warnings must be “effective and sufficient” to warn visitors of danger no need to warn of obvious risks
● Volenti nonfit injuria S2(5)- not liable for risks the visitor willingly accepts and full knowledge of any risks
Simms V Leigh
● Contributory negligence- Law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945
● Exclusion clauses S2(1) occupier can limit or exclude completely liability for death/ injury caused.
Apply after each one
12. Remedies
- special and general damages.