Post-Neoliberal: Harris
The Post-Neoliberal Imperative: Contesting the Next Economic Paradigm
Author and Background Information
Author: Jennifer M. Harris
Position: Co-Chair of BuildUS
Previous Roles: 2021-2023, Special Assistant to the President & Senior Director for International Economics on the National Security Council and National Economic Council.
Historical Context
Transition from Neoliberalism:
Approximately forty years of free-market ideology, termed neoliberalism, dominated U.S. economic policy and culture, rooted in the beliefs propagated by President Ronald Reagan.
A bipartisan consensus emerged that portrayed markets as efficient, wise, and fair, resisting governmental interference.
Economic Metrics:
Between 1982 and 2015, market capitalization of publicly traded companies surged from around 35% of GDP to about 95%.
Neoliberalism facilitated substantial growth in the private sector.
Shift Away from Neoliberalism
Rejecting Globalization:
Globalization began to be viewed negatively, associated with various social and economic issues like inequality, loss of manufacturing jobs, financial sector risks, and geopolitical tensions.
Political Responses:
Donald Trump's Presidency:
Initiated anti-neoliberal actions, imposing tariffs, and showing support for organized labor.
Ignored traditional neoliberal tenets, notably social spending cuts.
Joe Biden's Administration:
Departed from free-market principles, maintaining tariffs and promoting a new industrial policy favoring state intervention.
Restored pre-Reagan antitrust protections and celebrated union support, even participating in a strike with workers.
Emerging Economic Paradigm: Post-Neoliberalism
Definition and Properties:
Post-neoliberalism, a term used to identify a new economic script that addresses the imbalances inherent in current market structures.
Advocates for correction of wealth concentration and power asymmetries with increased government role in shaping markets.
Key beliefs include:
Markets concentrating wealth create systemic economic issues.
Government’s role is to ensure proper market functioning and social welfare.
Historical Comparison:
Unlike past economic shifts (Keynesianism and neoliberalism), which were often led by one political party, post-neoliberalism spans the political spectrum; support can be found from both Democrats and Republicans.
Characteristics of Post-Neoliberalism
Ideals:
Post-neoliberal proponents argue for a tangible balance within the economy.
Legislation focuses on addressing market inequalities and bolstering labor conditions, antitrust measures, and consumer protections.
Political Representation:
Figures from both political aisles express a need for shifts away from established neoliberal doctrines, viewing the economic status quo as a choice that can be altered.
Economic History Review
Critiquing Neoliberalism:
Neoliberalism promoted market efficiencies but created issues including:
Rising inequality and concentrated wealth where the top 0.1% doubled their wealth share to approximately 14%.
Manufacturing employment shrank from 22% to 9% of nonfarm jobs.
Increased U.S. dependency on China and global issues like climate change and economic vulnerabilities.
Key Tenets of Post-Neoliberalism
Balance and Build: What They Entail:
Balancing: Addressing power imbalances in economics, supporting antitrust regulations, and protecting labor rights.
Building: Encouraging productive investment in areas crucial for economic resilience (e.g., housing, clean energy).
Emphasizes the role of government in investing in public infrastructure instead of expecting markets to provide for these essential areas.
Policy Directions:
Shift toward more aggressive public investments in essentials, reclaiming governmental roles that have been minimized in recent decades.
Evaluating Post-Neoliberal Policies
Economic Outcomes:
Despite criticisms, post-neoliberal policies under Biden resulted in economic resilience and job growth compared to previous years, managing unemployment levels effectively.
Inflation Dynamics:
Inflation during 2021-2024 was a consequence more of supply chain disruptions than demand-induced growth.
Lessons learned from the 2008 financial crisis shaped the size of stimulus packages to prevent economic downturns.
Policymakers recognized the necessity for proactive interventions, focusing on the economic structure rather than solely on immediate fiscal correction.
Foreign Policy Implications
Changing Consensus in Trade:
Bipartisan acknowledgement that unfettered free trade is problematic, especially concerning U.S. dependence on China.
Strategies formed to enhance U.S. technological competitiveness through diverse initiatives including tariffs, export controls, and international trade agreements.
New Washington Consensus:
Emphasis on not just U.S. self-interest but fostering partnerships where other nations can align with U.S. economic and ethical objectives on technology and environmental policy.
The Role of Government in the Future
Addressing Economic and Civic Needs:
Government must encourage economic structures that uphold and enhance democracy rather than leave it to market-driven logic, presenting a more holistic view of economic arrangements.
Initiatives to empower communities and encourage participatory governance are crucial for balancing individual freedom with collective self-determination.
Necessity of Civic Engagement:
Political leaders are urged to rethink governmental roles in enabling opportunities for purpose, happiness, and meaningful lives through shared governance.
Future Prospects and Challenges
Sensible formulation of post-neoliberal policies is critical to prevent a regression into more authoritarian or extreme political structures.
Focus should remain on not only managing economic transitions but also instilling democratic processes through these changes.
Concluding Thoughts
The post-neoliberal era is not marked by an inevitable triumph but requires careful navigation, innovation, and a willingness to challenge existing economic narratives, ensuring a society that promotes democratic values and equitable growth.