Monopoly and Competition Notes
CHAPTER 12: MONOPOLY AND COMPETITION
Overview
- Monopoly and competition are often misunderstood and misused, leading to confusion.
- Monopoly has historically carried a negative connotation, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries, associated with exclusive privileges granted by rulers.
- In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the term "monopoly" was applied to large private businesses or "trusts," viewed negatively.
- Competition also faced criticism, with "cutthroat competition" labeled as detrimental during the New Deal era in the 1930s.
- Monopoly and competition are not mutually exclusive; both are essential for an effective market.
- Every tradesman has a monopoly over their wares, and every buyer seeks exclusive control over goods or services.
- The market relies on monopoly and thrives on competition.
- Some monopolies can exclude or reduce competition, and tradesmen often try to avoid competition.
- Monopoly and competition are complex and vital for understanding the market.
Definitions
- Trust: A business holding company that combines similar products, production processes, or diverse business enterprises.
- Cutthroat Competition: Excessive or mean-spirited competition, difficult to distinguish from regular competition.
- Monopoly: The absence of competition for a supplier of particular goods or services in a market, historically an exclusive right granted by ruling powers.
12.1 Monopoly
- Monopoly, in its broadest sense, means "exclusive possession or control of something."
- Private property is a monopoly of its owner, who has exclusive rights to control and dispose of it.
- Competition between sellers or buyers is possible because they have a monopoly on the goods they dispose of.
- The most basic monopoly is the exclusive right of free people to sell their labor services, differentiating freedom from slavery. It is a natural right and a natural monopoly.
- Individuals can dispose of their labor at a mutually agreeable price because of this monopoly.
Monopoly of Individual Labor
- The most fundamental monopoly is the exclusive right of free individuals to sell their labor.
- This right distinguishes freedom from slavery and is considered a natural right, hence a natural monopoly.
- The individual alone has the authority to direct the constructive use of their labor.
Landed Property
- All landed property is a monopoly of its owner.
- The owner possesses, controls, has dominion over, and may exclusively dispose of the land and structures on it.
- Governments often qualify the monopoly of land ownership.
- Restrictions prevent landowners from using their land to harm others, except in self-defense.
- In the U.S., eminent domain allows the government to take private property for public use with just compensation.
- Eminent domain has been controversially used for commercial development to increase the tax base.
- Excessive government qualifications erode the monopoly character of property, undermining voluntary trade and exchange.
Other Private Property
- All other private property (tangible or intangible, shares, cars, copyrights, patents, currency) is a monopoly of the owner.
- The owner is sovereign over their property and determines the selling price.
- Economists refer to consumer sovereignty, but neither buyer nor seller is sole sovereign; each has a veto over what they offer.
- The sovereignty of owners over their goods is crucial for free enterprise.
Public Discussion
- Public discussion of monopoly often revolves around "exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market" or "control that allows price manipulation."
- Two different types of monopolies warrant separate discussion.
12.1.1 The United States Postal Service (USPS)
The government grants the USPS an exclusive privilege to deliver first-class mail, making it a government-created monopoly.
The USPS contracts with private carriers for mail delivery.
The USPS claims a monopoly on delivering personally inscribed messages (First Class mail).
Its enforcement extends to advertisements and messages, claiming exclusive rights to deliver to postal or mail boxes.
Mail boxes are generally private, but the USPS restricts their use by other carriers.
The USPS demonstrates typical objections to monopoly, where prices are arbitrarily set without direct competition.
The USPS sets prices, and buyers can accept or reject them, lacking voluntary agreement between buyer and seller.
It is difficult to determine whether prices are high or low because other sellers are excluded.
The USPS's policies are sometimes arbitrary, political, or ideological rather than economic.
Charging the same price for local and distant deliveries is uneconomical.
The USPS once charged lower rates for local letters but abandoned this distinction.
Parcel post deliveries use a zoned system, but book rates are uniform across the U.S.
The USPS's rate system appears to be based on arbitrary, political, or ideological motives.
Governments tend to monopolize goods or services they offer for public sale due to their monopoly on the use of force.
Government operation is often bureaucratic, regulation-ridden, and governed by non-economic factors.
Strict rules are necessary to prevent arbitrary and despotic use of power.
Governments, focused on maintaining peace and enforcing laws, may carry these habits into the market.
12.1.2 The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)
- The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) exemplifies government's tendency to monopolize services.
- Authorized in 1933 during the New Deal, the TVA aimed to develop the Tennessee Valley region.
- Critics have labeled it socialistic due to government ownership of electricity production.
- The TVA became monopolistic, excluding private electricity companies from its region.
- Initially, electricity production was a byproduct of river taming and navigation improvements via dams.
- Electricity production and distribution became the TVA's dominant activity.
- The TVA sold electricity to municipalities, cooperatives, and non-profit organizations.
- As demand exceeded dam capacity, the TVA built coal-fired and nuclear plants to increase electricity production, establishing and maintaining its monopoly.
12.1.3 Government Grants of Monopoly
- Government grants of monopolies to private entities have historically been more common than direct government provision of goods and services.
- This practice was especially widespread during the mercantilist era of the 17th and 18th centuries.
- Trading companies were granted monopolies for specific goods or trade routes. The British East India Company's tea monopoly led to the Boston Tea Party.
- Early America fostered road and bridge building by granting monopolies to companies, allowing them to collect tolls.
- State and local governments now grant monopolies to private companies through exclusive franchises for public utilities like electric, telephone, and transportation companies.
- These franchises are often justified as natural monopolies, where multiple providers would be impractical due to infrastructure constraints (wires, tracks, pipelines).
- The rationale for granting monopoly franchises weakens for services like buses, garbage collection, and trucking, which are not inherently natural monopolies.
Natural Monopoly
- Natural Monopoly: A natural monopoly refers to a service that is impractical to have multiple companies provide. Examples include services that require extensive infrastructure such as laying wires, tracks, or pipelines like electricity or land-line telephone service.