Historical roots in the eighteenth-century classical school of criminology.
Delinquents are presumed to have free will and rationality, deserving punishment over treatment.
Delinquency viewed as purposeful, driven by a rational decision-making process weighing pros and cons.
Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (1747)
Advocated against severe punishments for crime in "On the Spirit of the Laws."
Cesare Bonesana, Marquis of Beccaria (1764)
Proposed punishment should be public, immediate, proportionate, and determined by laws.
Stressed the importance of swift and certain punishment.
Jeremy Bentham (1780)
Suggested punishment deters crime if proportionate.
Identified four objectives of punishment:
Prevent all offenses if possible.
Persuade offenders to choose lesser offenses.
Minimize harm to society.
Achieve crime prevention at minimal cost.
Human beings as rational creatures capable of responsible action.
Shift from theological determinism to free will in understanding criminal behavior.
Justification of punishment based on utility, aiming for societal protection.
Emphasis on deterrence as the dominant theme.
Rational scale of punishment necessary to outweigh benefits of crime.
Equal justice under law, with acts judged regardless of beliefs.
The 1970s-80s saw an academic shift towards viewing crime as rational choice.
Ecological Tradition and Market Theory:
Suggests offenders make rational choices based on crime distribution data.
Economic Analysis:
Criminals are rational decision-makers acting in response to incentives.
Emphasizes that criminality results from conscious choices where perceived benefits outweigh costs.
Extends classical school deterrence doctrine, reinforcing the concept of free will.
Examines crime-rate trends in relation to daily social interaction patterns.
Posits three main variables influencing predatory crime:
Suitable targets.
Absence of capable guardians.
Presence of motivated offenders.
Theorist(s) and Principles:
Rational Choice (Paternoster): Not reliant on complete information for behavior to occur.
Routine Activities (Cohen and Felson): Focused on target availability, guardianship, and motivated offenders.
Routine Activities (Messner and Tardiff): Framework for understanding homicides in Manhattan.
Routine Activities (Osgood et al.): Peer socialization and authority absence as crime catalysts.
Rational choice theory posits delinquency is planned, involving:
Scheme formulation.
Assessment of alternatives.
Selection of a course of action.
Execution of actions for desired outcomes.
General Deterrence: Punishing one as a warning to others.
Specific Deterrence: Aims to prevent repeat offenses by the individual.
Incapacitation: Physically restraining offenders to protect society.
Laws governing human behavior akin to sciences; influenced by biological and psychological factors.
Delinquents' choices often altered by identifiable biological/psychological influences.
Individual character and background as key to delinquent behavior.
Determinism exists—delinquency shaped by prior causes.
Delinquents differ fundamentally from non-delinquents, requiring identification of influencing factors.
Explains delinquency through three forms: biological, psychological, and sociological.
Early belief linking biological traits to delinquency; divided into two periods:
**Nature vs. Nurture (19th-20th centuries)
Cesare Lombroso's Influence: The rooted belief in the born criminal.
Atavistic Criminal Theory: Suggests born criminals display primitive evolutionary traits leading to delinquency.
Sociobiology: Interaction of biology and the environment correlates with delinquent behavior.
Potential associations with eugenics create contemporary avoidance of certain biological theories.
Genetics indicated through twin and adoption research to support theories of behavior similarities among relatives.
Studies reveal links between intelligence and delinquency, particularly racial disparities in rates of unlawful behavior.
Delinquency may stem from variations in the autonomic nervous system and challenge of moral conditioning.
Childhood Activity and Emotionality: Hyperactivity and emotional responses linked to behavioral patterns and mental health issues.
Characterized by inattentiveness and hyperactivity which influences risk factors for delinquency.
LDs impact interpretation and linkage of information, relating to delinquent activity.
Common types: developmental speech/language disorders, academic skills disorders.
Criminal behavior might relate to orthomolecular imbalances or brain toxicity.
Weak links identified between chemical imbalances and delinquent behavior exist.
Biosocial criminology combines biological traits with environmental influences on behavior.
Focus on brain development in youth as crucial.
Emotional disturbances from lack of nurturing can lead to delinquent actions.
Freud's contributions identified emotional control issues as bases for delinquency's root causes.
Linked to optimal arousal theory; individuals seeking novel experiences may be predisposed to delinquency.
Behavior shaped by outcomes—rewards encourage crime while consequences deter.
Trait-based models highlight personality aspects essential to understanding delinquency.
Hard-core juvenile delinquents may exhibit psychopathic traits, frequently diagnosed as conduct disorders.
Influenced by Piaget, children's reasoning abilities evolve, impacting their understanding of delinquent actions.
Four stages of cognitive development identified:
Sensorimotor (0-2 years)
Preoperational (2-7 years)
Concrete operational (7-11 years)
Formal operational (11 years-adulthood)
Table highlighting various biological, sociobiological, and psychological theories with proponents and supporting research.
Important studies include the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, Montreal Longitudinal Experimental Study, and Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development:
Developmental behaviors evolve due to biological, psychological, and sociological influences.
Explores why some youth overcome adverse conditions while others do not; focus on mother's child interactions.
Research and theories are interlinked, guiding policy and interventions for delinquent youth.
Issues of desistance discussed, emphasizing ongoing challenges in defining and recognizing a true cessation of delinquent behavior.