Social Influence
Social Influence
Dr. Valerie Todd
Overview of Social Influence
Incidental Influence: Automatic, unconscious social knowledge activation.
Deliberate Influence: Intentional influence from sources like celebrities.
Conformity: Adjusting behavior or beliefs to align with others.
Reactance: Opposing perceived threats to personal freedom.
Minority Influence: Small groups affecting majority views.
Obedience: Following commands from authority figures.
Disobedience: Choosing not to follow commands or social norms.
Conclusion: Impact of social norms on personal behavior.
Defining Social Influence
Affects attitudes, opinions, values, and behaviors.
Involves conformity, obedience, and societal interactions.
Raises the question of individual control over actions.
Incidental Influence
Definition: Triggering relevant information based on environmental cues without conscious awareness.
Example: Online public affairs exposure improving recognition and recall (Lee & Kim, 2017).
Social Norms
Definition: Informal rules and standards governing behavior in specific circumstances.
Characteristics: Context-dependent and not legally defined.
Reasons for Following Social Norms
Reduces anxiety about social situations.
Facilitates coordination and positive social interactions.
Motivated by fear of negative evaluations by peers.
Descriptive Social Norms
Observational behavior patterns based on how others act.
Context-specific, informal, and can result in negative outcomes (e.g., from banter to bullying).
Injunctive Social Norms
Norms indicating behaviors that should be followed.
Formal conventions with potential social sanctions by peers rather than legal consequences.
Social Facilitation and Inhibition
Performance Influences: Confidence can enhance performance, while uncertainty may hinder it.
Susceptibility to Incidental Influence
Influenced by group conformity pressures.
Desire for acceptance and relationship building drives social navigation.
Deliberate Influence
Example: Kylie Jenner, renowned for influencing consumer behavior with 450 million followers.
Implication: Links to attitude change through persuasion.
Response to Deliberate Influence
Conformity: Aligning one’s views with the majority.
Reactance: Adopting opposing views when personal freedom is threatened.
Persuasion: Changing beliefs through emotional engagement or information.
Minority Influence: Small groups prompting reflection in the majority.
Understanding Conformity
Definition: Change in belief/behavior to match a group.
Triggers include:
Group Pressure: Physical presence.
Imagined Group Pressure: Social norms or unspoken expectations.
Classic studies: Sheriff (1935) and Asch (1951).
Motives for Conformity
Normative Conformity: Desire for social acceptance.
Informational Conformity: Seeking correctness and factual accuracy.
Identification Conformity: Aligning with social roles.
Reactance Explained
Response to perceived threats against personal freedoms.
Involves cognitive, motivational, and affective processes.
Likelihood of reactance increases with outside group threats.
Vicarious Reactance: Feeling threatened on behalf of others.
Minority Influence Dynamics
Minorities present alternative viewpoints.
Majority’s conflict creates pressure, requiring minority consistency for impact.
Challenges conventional thinking, fostering broader consideration of issues.
Neural Correlates of Conformity
Brain regions involved in conformity and conflict, highlighting interaction with reward mechanisms (Klucharev et al., 2009).
Individual versus aggregate rating discrepancies activate relevant brain areas predicting conformity.
Obedience Defined
Compliance with commands from authority, often with personal reluctance.
Foundational research: Milgram (1963).
Insight into Milgram's Findings
Individuals may harm others believing they serve a virtuous purpose.
Engagement conditions influence conformity to authority figures.
Disobedience
Definition: Choosing not to follow commands, which can lead to various outcomes.
Formal Disobedience: Whistleblowing
Whistleblowing entails lawful disclosure of wrongdoing.
Degree of morality and ethics dictate the likelihood of whistleblowing behavior (Dungan, Young, & Waytz, 2019).
Influence of Group Affiliation on Whistleblowing
Predicting Factors: People are influenced by their internal social groups regarding wrongdoing.
Individuals are more likely to report misconduct against outsiders than against insiders due to group loyalty.
Conclusion on Social Influence
Compliance stems from social pressures to conform.
Behavioral changes often arise from fear of exclusion or misinformation.
Emphasizes the discomfort associated with standing out.