2.11 (1)
Overview of Checks on the Judicial Branch
Introduction by Miss Sierra from Pinecrest Preparatory Academy Charter High School in Miami, Florida.
Focus of the lesson: Exploring the checks on the judicial branch and practicing concept application.
Connection to Checks and Balances
Importance of understanding the relationship between branches of government:
Recall Lesson 1.6 on checks and balances.
Key Question: How does the judicial branch, which checks the other branches, itself get checked?
Congressional Checks on the Judicial Branch
Congress has multiple ways to influence and check the power of the Supreme Court (SCOTUS).
Direct Responses
Legislation Impacting Court Jurisdiction
Congress can pass laws that may limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
This is considered a significant and often harsh response to court rulings.
Modifying Legislation
If Congress disagrees with a SCOTUS ruling, it can rewrite laws to ensure compliance.
Example: Passage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act.
SCOTUS deemed it unconstitutional in US v. Lopez.
Congress responded by modifying the act to avoid conflict with SCOTUS rulings.
Fiscal Actions
Congress can impact policy through budgetary control:
Cutting or increasing funding related to judicially impacted policies.
Constitutional Amendments
Congress has the power to propose constitutional amendments to counter Supreme Court decisions.
Example: In response to Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust (1895), which ruled income taxes unconstitutional, Congress passed the 16th Amendment allowing income taxes.
Conducting Oversight Hearings
Congress can hold hearings to oversee judicial workings and operations.
Utilizing Fiscal Federalism
Encouraging states to enact laws that align with national legislation through financial incentives.
Less Direct Influences
Senatorial Courtesy
Senators can influence the nomination of SCOTUS justices by providing input or blocking candidates from their state.
Advice and Consent
The Senate has the right to approve or reject SCOTUS nominees, impacting the makeup of the court significantly.
Presidential Checks on the Judicial Branch
The President also has avenues for checking SCOTUS power.
Direct Checks
Refusing to Enforce Decisions
The President can refuse to enforce judicial decisions.
Example: President Andrew Jackson's response to Cherokee Nation v. Georgia:
Stated, "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it."
This highlights the executive's disregard for the court's ruling.
Issuing Executive Orders
The President can issue executive orders that address or mitigate the effects of SCOTUS decisions.
Indirect Influences
Judicial Appointments
The President has the power to appoint justices to the Supreme Court, which influences the ideological balance and functioning of the court.
Concept Application
Understanding theoretical concepts and applying them to specific scenarios.
Practice Scenario
Familiar example used for SCOTUS practice.
Focus on how SCOTUS's power can address allegations in a scenario.
Judicial Review as a tool to address issues:
Definition: The ability of the Supreme Court to invalidate laws or governmental actions that violate the Constitution.
Contextual Application
How executive interaction affects judicial review.
Judicial review relies on executive enforcement; if the executive does not enforce, its effectiveness is limited.
Example of the Department of Justice (part of the executive) objecting to state laws reinforces federal supremacy.
Importance of aligning wording with prompts in written responses:
Responses should clearly apply concepts directly to the scenario, using precise language to convey understanding.
Emphasizes not merely discussing concepts but illustrating how they specifically relate to the case in question.
Conclusion and Key Takeaways
The judicial branch has the power to check the other branches, but it is also subject to checks itself by Congress and the President.
Effective concept application involves tying theoretical frameworks to specific, contextual scenarios.