Forensics Chapter One
Definitions
Forensic Science
Any science applied to the law
Science of association
Emphasis on science
Scientific method
Principles of biology, chemistry and physics
CSI Effect
Jurors were watching CSI, and they believed the forensics scientists did something wrong or weren't doing enough
History
Mattieu Orfila
“Father of Toxicology”
He improved the field and wrote lots of books
LaFarge Case
A lady killed her husband with Arsenic. The scientists couldn't detect the arsenic and Mattieu did the test correctly and found it
Alphonse Bertillion
Anthropometry
First person to try and individualize
Francis Galton
Fingerprinting, specifically the uniqueness
And their classification - along with Henry Faulds
Leon Lattes
He was the first to do ABO Blood typing on dried bloodstains
Karl Landsteiner developed ABO blood typing
Calvin Goddard
Forensic Ballistics
St. Valentines Day massacre
Sacco & Venzetti
Albert Osborn
Document Analysis
Walter McCrone
Forensic Microscopy
Hans Gross
Judge
Really big on the use of forensics from a law perspective
Edmond Locard
If you exchange material with your surroundings, your material exchanges surroundings with you.
Locards Exchange Principle
“Every contact leaves a trace”
The Crime Lab
First Crime Lab: LA 1923
Largest crime lab : FBI Lab
Now
411 public crime labs
1960’s Boom
Supreme Court put an emphasis on scientifically evaluated evidence
Drug Boom
DNA Profiling
Disorganized because of such rapid growth
Accreditation
About 80% of crime labs are accredited
Definition
Set of agreed upon standards that a crime lab follows & an accrediting body audits. Every four years you get a full audit. They look at every case and all the paperwork. If you make too many mistakes you lose your accreditation
Accrediting Body
ANAB - ANSI National Accreditation Board
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
Standard to which crime labs are held – ISO 17025
International Standard Organization
Any sort of testing lab is held to this standard
National Academy of Sciences Report
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forwards
Came out in 2009
13 recommendations
Number 7 was requiring mandatory accreditation
Identified Problem Children
Handwriting
Firearms/bullets
Tool marks
Footwear impressions
Tire impressions
Bitemarks
Fingerprints
Sections
Physical Sciences – own section or split
Controlled substances – drugs outside of a person, they haven't taken the drugs yet
Trace – hairs, fibers, paint
Arson/explosives
Biology
Serology – Identification of body fluids
DNA
Databases
Firearms
Bullets and casings, trajectory
GSR – gunshot residue
Questioned Documents
Handwriting
Paper/ink analysis
Photography
Different types of light
Other fields
Psychiatry, odontology, engineering, digital
Optional
Toxicology
Drugs inside people
Might be combined with medical examiner
Latent Fingerprints
Often officers or former officers
Crime Scene investigators
Commonly found attached to law enforcement
Evidence Technicians
Usually attached and trained by crime lab
On-call and trained to be familiar with all kinds of evidence
Extremely Optional
Polygraph
Usually on law enforcement side
Not used very much except for employment
Voice Print Analysis
More commonly found under digital forensics
Scientific Method
If there is something in question
Provides consistency
Everyone should get the same answer
What does a forensic Scientist do
Apply different methods to different aspect of evidence examination
Usually physical evidence
Write reports based on examinations
Testify in court about their findings
Expert Witness
Expert Witness
One type of witness
Can testify on their opinions
Due to their skills/education
You can be accepted as an expert witness
Voir Dire
Direct and Cross
Why can’t someone just read the report we wrote?
Melendez Diaz v Massachusetts
2009 supreme court decision
Sixth Amendment
Confront witnesses
Based on Crawford v. Washington
Upheld by Bullcoming v. New Mexico
Admissibility of Evidence
New type of analysis or new type of evidence
Can you testify about it
Several different standards for admissibility
Frye
Frye v. United States
Set forth in 1923
One criteria
General acceptance
States that use Frye
Illinois
Minnesota
New York
Pennsylvania
Washington
Daubert
Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals
1993
Established Judge as gatekeeper
5 criteria for admissibility
Technique
Published and peer reviewed
Error rate can be calculated
Standards exist for this technique
Widespread acceptance
Covered only scientific evidence until Kumho tire v. Carmichael
Expanded to technical knowledge
Most States use Daubert
Including CT
Some use other standard or combinations
Federal Rules of Evidence
Specifically Rule 702
3 Criteria
Based on sufficient evidence or data
Product of reliable principles and methods
Principles are applied reliably
All federal cases use this standard
Other legal considerations
Brady v Maryland
“discovery”
Prosecution has to give defense access to exculpatory evidence
The defense doesn't have to ask
Up to state to determine what is discoverable
Problems with prosecution being stingy