UK Public Law – Comprehensive Bullet-Point Notes
Course & Instructor Overview
- Course: COML9045 Public Law – HKU SPACE UoL LLB-CertHE Prep (2024/25)
- Lecturer: Dr David Yuratich
• Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Exeter
• Email: d.a.yuratich@Exeter.ac.uk
• Author of Public Law: Principles to Practice (OUP 2024) - Lecture Schedule (sample)
• 7–12 Dec 24 – Intro, UK constitution
• 8 Dec 24 – Separation of powers & devolution
• 10–12 Dec 24 – Constitutional principles: parliamentary sovereignty & rule of law; the Crown; conventions
• 14–20 Dec 24 – Judicial review (illegality, irrationality, proportionality, procedure)
• 20 Dec 24 – Revision lecture
What Public Law Covers
- Public law = constitutional + administrative law
• Constitutional law: empowers/regulates executive, legislature, judiciary & sets their relationships with each other and citizens
• Administrative law: constrains executive via judicial review etc.
- Classic definitions
• Elliott & Thomas – “basic ground rules determining powers of government & rights of individuals”
• Bogdanor – “rules regulating system of government & its relation to individuals”
• Le Sueur – “most important rules about structure/powers of government & basic freedoms” - Typical format worldwide
• Single written document as higher law, judicially enforceable - UK format
• Uncodified (not “unwritten”): multiple sources, no higher-law status
• Key sources: Acts of Parliament, common law, conventions, official manuals (Cabinet Manual, Ministerial Code), and guiding principles (rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty, separation of powers)
Codification vs Non-Codification: Practical Contrasts
- USA presidential succession fixed in Constitution + statute; UK PM chosen by convention (confidence of Commons)
- US Supreme Court can strike down statutes; UK courts cannot invalidate Acts of Parliament (may issue HRA 1998 s4 declarations or quash delegated legislation)
- Conventions supplement US operation (e.g.
federal electors) but form part of UK constitution (e.g. choice of PM, ministerial resignations)
Core Constitutional Principles in the UK
1. Parliamentary Sovereignty
- Diceyan formula: Parliament “can make/unmake any law & no body may override it”
- Crown-in-Parliament (Commons + Lords + Monarch) enacts law
- Parliament Acts 1911 & 1949: Commons can legislate without Lords in limited cases
- Tomkins’ “beautiful rule”: Govt functions only with support of Parliament
- Key Questions: self-limitation, implied repeal, constitutional statutes, manner-and-form entrenchment
2. Rule of Law
- UNISON 2017: society governed by law; govt subject to law; access to courts essential
- Formal vs substantive conceptions
• Formal (Raz): prospectivity, clarity, courts, limited discretion
• Substantive (Bingham, Dworkin, Allan): may embrace human rights, equality, justice - Dicey’s triad: no punishment without law, equality before law, common-law liberties
3. Separation of Powers
- Montesquieu ideal: executive, legislature, judiciary independent to prevent tyranny
- UK reality = fusion of executive & legislature (Westminster model)
- 2005 Constitutional Reform Act created Supreme Court; Lord Chancellor roles split
- Barendt: better seen as separation of functions
- Ongoing questions: judicial independence; political vs legal constitution.
4. The Crown & Prerogative
- Crown = multi-faceted: Monarch, government, prosecution, courts
- Executive prerogatives (e.g. treaty-making, war, passports) vs personal/reserve powers (appoint PM, dissolve Parliament)
- Case of Proclamations 1611: prerogative limited by law; cannot be extended (confirmed in BBC v Johns)
- Control mechanisms
• Statutory displacement (De Keyser 1920; Anisminic 1969)
• Judicial review if justiciable (GCHQ 1985; Miller 2017 & 2019)
• Political conventions (ministerial advice; war-powers votes)
Institutions & Processes
The Executive
- Led by PM (convention: commands Commons)
- Cabinet: up to 21 paid Secretaries of State (Ministerial & Other Salaries Act 1975)
- Patronage & reshuffles; collective responsibility; “payroll vote”
Parliament (Legislature)
- House of Commons: 650 MPs, first-past-the-post, debates, motions, scrutiny
- House of Lords: ~750 peers (life, 92 hereditary, 26 bishops); revising chamber; can delay Bills; reform history (1911, 1949, 1999, 2014)
- Legislative stages: Pre-leg consultation → 3 Readings + Committee + Report → Ping-Pong → Royal Assent
- Delegated legislation: SIs, Orders; skeleton Bills; Henry VIII clauses (Public Law Project, Allister)
Judiciary
- Supreme Court (since 2009) independent of Parliament
- Judicial appointments removed from House of Lords; enhanced separation
- Lord Chancellor now political (Justice Sec) + duty to uphold judicial independence (CRA 2005 s3)
Parliamentary Scrutiny & Political Constitution
- Select Committees (Commons, Lords, Joint) examine departments, policies, topical crises
- Questions, debates, motions, no-confidence votes (FTP Act 2011 repealed)
- Backbench influence, free votes, Private Member Bills
- Political accountability complements limited legal justiciability
Multi-Layered Government & Devolution
- Referendums 1997 created new legislatures; no devolution in England (West Lothian question)
- Scotland (Holyrood): 129 MSPs, reserved-powers model; indy-ref powers need s30 Order (Lord Advocate Ref 2022)
- Wales (Senedd): evolved from executive to legislative powers; reserved model but narrower
- Northern Ireland (Stormont): power-sharing; suspended several times; border poll provision
- Westminster remains sovereign (AXA 2011); Sewel Convention = political not legal (Miller 2017)
- Section 35 Scotland Act: UK SoS can block devolved Bills (Gender Recognition decision 2023)
Parliamentary Sovereignty: Nuances & Limits
- Implied repeal (Ellen Street Estates) vs constitutional statutes (Thoburn, HS2, Allister)
- Manner-and-form entrenchment debates (Jennings; Commonwealth cases)
- EU membership & supremacy (Factortame; ECA 1972; Repeal via EUW Act 2018)
- Courts’ obiter on potential common-law limits (Jackson 2005; AXA 2011; Moohan 2014)
- Rwanda Asylum policy & Safety of Rwanda Act 2023 tested boundaries (repealed 2024)
Rule of Law in Action
- Access to courts fee case: UNISON 2017
- Ministerial veto on FOI quashed: Evans 2015
- Assisted suicide & moral questions: Nicklinson 2014
- Internal Market Bill 2020 & proposed breach of international law – political push-back
Conventions of the Constitution
- Non-legal rules guiding actors; identified via Jennings Test (precedent, obligation, reason)
- Examples
• Cardinal convention: Monarch acts on ministerial advice
• Choosing PM (confidence of Commons)
• Ministerial & collective cabinet responsibility (Ministerial Code; Nolan principles)
• Sewel Convention (legislative consent)
• Parliamentary votes on military action (post-2003 developing practice) - Enforceability: political sanctions, not courts (Jonathan Cape; Miller 2017 confirms)
Human Rights Act 1998 & ECHR
- Incorporates Convention rights; “bringing rights home”
- Section 2: courts must take into account ECtHR; mirror principle (Ullah) with dialogue (Horncastle, Elan-Cane)
- Section 3: interpret legislation compatibly “so far as possible” (Ghaidan) – cannot contradict statute’s “grain”
- Section 4: Declaration of incompatibility – no invalidation; prompts political response (Belmarsh, Steinfeld, Mercer 2024)
- Section 6: unlawful for public authority to breach rights; core vs hybrid authorities (Aston Cantlow)
- Proposed reforms (Bill of Rights 2022 – now shelved): restrict s3, s2, positive obligations; Illegal Migration Act 2023 dis-applies s3
Judicial Review
Purpose
- Uphold rule of law; ensure public bodies act intra vires; supervisory not appellate (Corner House)
Two-Stage Procedure
- Permission
• Timing – within 3 months (CPR 54.5)
• Standing – s31(3) SCA 1981 “sufficient interest”; liberal for public interest groups (World Development Movement) but narrower “victim” test under HRA s7
• Amenability – body performing public function (Datafin; Beer) - Merits (Grounds)
Grounds of Review (Diplock, GCHQ)
- Illegality – misuse of power, irrelevant considerations, improper purpose, delegation (Padfield; De Keyser; Carltona)
- Irrationality – Wednesbury unreasonableness; anxious scrutiny; super-Wednesbury (Smith; Nottinghamshire)
- Proportionality – EU & HRA contexts; four-stage Bank Mellat test; balance & “least intrusive” (Daly; Tigere)
- Procedural impropriety – natural justice (Ridge v Baldwin); right to be heard (Doody; Osborn); bias (Pinochet; Porter v Magill)
Ouster Clauses
- Courts interpret narrowly to preserve review (Anisminic; Privacy International)
- New statutory ousters: Judicial Review & Courts Act 2022 s11A (Upper Tribunal), Dissolution & Calling of Parliament Act 2022 s3
Delegated Legislation & Henry VIII Clauses
- Need for detail; risks of over-breadth
- Skeleton Bills; Re Allister 2023 confirms broad wording allows wide amendment
- Courts can quash delegated legislation (unlike primary Acts)
Ethical, Philosophical & Real-World Implications
- Democracy vs judicial oversight (Sumption in Nicklinson)
- International law tension (Internal Market Bill; Rwanda treaty)
- Devolution politics (indyref; NI protocol)
- House of Lords legitimacy vs expertise
- Rise of legal constitutionalism: courts hinting at ultimate rule-of-law limits on Parliament
Exam & Study Tips
- Always support arguments with authority (cases, statutes, scholars)
- Distinguish good vs bad evidence (lecture slide example)
- Use principle-case-application structure: state rule, cite authority, apply to facts
- Anticipate essay themes: separation of powers rigidity; political vs legal constitution; devolution complexity; sovereignty limits; rule-of-law content
- Problem questions: identify powers, source, potential illegality/irrationality etc.; discuss remedies (quashing, declaration, damages under HRA)
- Remember revision lectures & VLE resources for further readings