Introduction to Sociology - Week Eight Day One

SOCL 1101: Intro to Sociology Week Eight - Day One

Instructor: JD Foster (he/him/his), PhD Candidate, Northeastern University


Today's Tentative Agenda

  • What is stratification?

  • Historic views of inequality

  • Modern theories of inequality

  • Perceptions of Equality

  • Standards of Equality

  • Forms of Stratification


Stratification

Geological Metaphor

  • “Strata” means layer

  • Societies are similar to the earth in that they are:

    • Organized into strata

    • Though they seem solid and unmoving, they are often fluid

    • Subject to upheavals that can restructure the landscape (e.g., Occupy Wall Street, MAGA)


Social Stratification

  • STRATIFICATION (Book Definition):

    • The hierarchical organization of a society into groups with differing levels of power, social prestige, status, and economic resources.

    • Socially constructed distinctions between the privileged and the deprived.

    • Mobility: Individual and collective mobility occurs, but these are shaped by social contexts.

    • Variability: Stratification varies across space and time, but usually follows predictable patterns.

    • Questions posed:

      • How?

      • Why?

      • What effects does it have on our lives?


Socioeconomic Status

  • SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS (SES): An individual’s position within a stratified social order.

  • In the U.S., SES categories include:

    • Upper class

    • Middle class

    • Working class

    • Poor

Definitions

  • INCOME: Money received by a person from work, transfers (gifts, inheritances, government assistance), or returns on investments.

  • WEALTH: An individual’s or family’s net worth (total assets minus total debts).


Social Mobility

  • SOCIAL MOBILITY: Movement between different positions within a system of stratification.

Types of Mobility

  • Horizontal Social Mobility: Transition from one social status to another on the same rung of the ladder.

  • Vertical Social Mobility: Refers to the rise or fall from one social stratum to another and can be:

    • Upward/ascending

    • Downward/descending

  • Vertical mobility can occur at the individual or group level.


Structural and Exchange Mobility

  • STRUCTURAL MOBILITY: Mobility caused by changes in the economy (e.g., expansion of high-tech jobs in the past 20 years).

  • EXCHANGE MOBILITY: Results from job swapping among individuals or groups.


Political Implications of Stratification

  • Political rhetoric often fueled by stratification and class inequality including:

    • Labor market uncertainty contributing to anti-immigrant sentiment

    • Populist movements opposed to Wall Street

    • The concept of the 1% vs. the 99%

  • Broader implications include:

    • The shape of society

    • Access to rewarding jobs

    • Impact on health, longevity, and family stability


Testing Class Inequality: SAT Scores




  • SAT: Student Affluence Test



  • Average scores on each SAT section correlated with parental income:


    Parental Income Bracket

    SAT Writing

    SAT Reading

    SAT Math

    Combined Average



    $0-$20k

    400

    300

    100

    800



    $20-40k

    500

    400

    200

    1100



    $40-60k

    600

    500

    300

    1400



    $60-80k

    700

    600

    400

    1700



    $80-100k

    800

    700

    500

    2000



    $100-120k

    900

    800

    600

    2300



    $120-140k

    1000

    900

    700

    2600



    $140-160k

    1100

    1000

    800

    2900



    $160-200k

    1200

    1100

    900

    3200



    $200k+

    1300

    1200

    1000

    3500














    Sociological Questions on Stratification

    • Key inquiry areas include:

      • Social influences on who gets ahead and their access to elite positions

      • The meaning of “class” and changes in the class structure over time

      • Class inequality's influence on public policy-making and implications for democracy

      • The U.S.'s status as an open society compared to European societies


    Four Key Propositions on Stratification

    1. Individual attributes alone cannot explain stratification; systemic aspects or institutionalized systems of inequality must be examined.

    2. Physical differences have socially constructed meanings (e.g., height, beauty, racial identity).

    3. Almost any marker can exclude individuals from privilege (e.g., religion, language, speech).

    4. The same features can have different meanings across societies or times (e.g., body image).


    Historic Views of Inequality

    Rousseau vs. Scots

    • Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Argued that private property creates social inequality which leads to conflict.

    • Adam Ferguson and John Millar: Acknowledge inequality creation by private property but argue it leads to progress/innovation.

    Malthus: Man Is Destined to Starve

    • Thomas Malthus viewed inequality as necessary for controlling population growth, fearing equal distribution would lead to unsustainable population levels.

    • Malthusian Theory: Belief that population growth surpasses means of subsistence, requiring checks through disasters or moral restraint.

    Hegel's Dialectic

    • DIALECTIC: Two-directional relationship where thesis is countered by antithesis leading to synthesis.

    • Hegel believed history is evolving towards greater equality.

      Hegel's Dialectic Structure:

      • Thesis

      • Antithesis

      • Synthesis


    Modern Theories of Inequality

    Functionalism

    • Core Argument: Modifying stratification disrupts social order, requiring limitation of change.

    • Assumptions:

      • Institutions cultivate human skills, rewards correspond to functional importance.

      • Assumes no alternative motivations exist.

    Davis and Moore's Theory of Stratification (1945)

    • Stratification persists across societies including Soviet states; exists for a reason.

    • Claims inequalities arise as a device to fill critical positions in society with qualified persons.

    Critiques of Davis & Moore
    • The theory presumes ideal conditions over reality.

    • Positions are often filled without merit, influenced by inequitable advantages.

    • Doesn’t account for the actual range of societal inequalities.

    • Rejects relevant individual motivations or value of non-competitive high-paying roles.

    Marx and Weber

    • Marx’s Dialectic Materialism: Change resultant from struggles over control of economic resources.

    • DIALECTIC MATERIALISM: History defined by conflicts over material resources.

    • Marx divided society into PROLETARIAT (working class) and BOURGEOISIE (capitalist class).

    Weber's Critique of Marx
    • Weber emphasized the importance of ideas as factors influencing class and socioeconomic status.

    • Class identity relates to common life chances in the market rather than just economic class.


    Marx and Weber (Continued)

    Petit Bourgeoisie

    • Marx's View: Viewed as aspiring capitalists.

    • Weber's View: More complex; suggests multifaceted identities.

    Marx Predictions on Capitalism

    1. Capital accumulation leads to class polarization.

    2. Growth of the proletariat through urbanization and unions.

    3. Deepening economic crises.

    4. Growing class consciousness leads to revolutions, suggesting that working-class action would be more effective than parliamentary methods.

    Benefits of Marx's Theories

    • Challenges classlessness myth; promotes a critical view of ideologies.

    • Argues that in capitalism, virtually everything is commodified.

    Critiques of Marx's Theories

    • Underestimation of the expansion of intermediate classes and political reforms.

    • Neglects other sources of conflict, such as racial, ethnic, and nationalism issues.

    Neo-Marxist Views

    • Class defined by control over production and labor dynamics introduces ambiguity in class relations.

    • Women and minorities remain disadvantaged.


    The Gig Economy

    • Defined as markets that match providers to consumers on a job basis, facilitating on-demand commerce (e.g., Uber).

    • Gig workers have autonomy and choose their work schedule, reflecting aspects of individual freedom.


    Status-Attainment Model

    • STATUS-ATTAINMENT MODEL: Ranks individuals by socioeconomic status, focusing on income and educational attainment as predictors of career success.

    • Observations indicate parental education and net worth are primary predictors of children's outcomes.


    Critique of Status-Attainment Theory

    • Emphasis on mobility without addressing why class structures change over time.

    • Increasing data shows declining social mobility in the U.S. compared to Europe.


    Cultural Theories of Stratification

    • Recognition that class is influenced by cultural tastes and lifestyles rather than just wealth.

    • Exposure to cultural capital influences status and can serve as a marker of classification.

    • Pierre Bourdieu theorizes that tastes both reflect and reinforce social class positions.


    Perceptions of Equality

    Perception versus Reality

    • Group discussions on perceived versus actual CEO compensation highlights disparity between public perception and reality.

      • Average perception of CEO to worker pay gap is perceived as 36 to 1, ideal should be 7 to 1.

    • Actual ratio (top 350 firms, 2017) is 312 to 1.


    Standards of Equality

    Definitions

    • EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY: Everyone should have equal chances to achieve wealth and status; depicted by antidiscrimination laws.

    • EQUALITY OF CONDITION: Implies equal starting conditions for all individuals.

    • EQUALITY OF OUTCOME: Ensures that everyone ends up with the same amount regardless of fairness in the process.

      • Under equality of outcome, motivations for effort are transformed (altruism).

      • FREE RIDER PROBLEM: When group responsibilities are shared, individuals may shirk efforts, relying on others.


    Forms of Stratification

    Types

    1. Estate System: Characterized by limited mobility, politically based.

    2. Caste System: No mobility, stratified by hereditary elements.

    3. Class System: Economically based but with some mobility.

    4. Status Hierarchy System: Based on social prestige.

    5. Elite-Mass Dichotomy System: Features governing elites vs. masses; reflects meritocratic ideals.

    Critiques of Elite-Mass Dichotomy

    • C. Wright Mills argues against its naturalness or societal benefits.

    • Claims that decision-making power is increasingly centralized in economic, political, and military institutions.


    Conclusion

    • Understanding the multifaceted dimensions of stratification is crucial for analyzing social relations and inequalities.

    • The discourse is continually evolving, influenced by economic, sociopolitical, and cultural factors.


    NOTE:

    Participate for grade points by scanning the QR Code provided in class.