Ableism: Understanding Human Differences and Disability Rights
Definition and Scope of Ableism
Definition of Ableism:
Refers to the process of determining an individual’s internal and external abilities based on their disabilities.
Encompasses any policy or practice that promotes the belief that a disability justifies discrimination against people with disabilities (Linton, 1998).
People with Disabilities as a Minority Group
Reasons for Classification as a Minority Group:
Possessing a disability significantly influences an individual's sense of identity and has a direct impact on daily life.
Able-bodied individuals frequently exhibit negative reactions toward a person’s disability.
These negative reactions often lead to personal rejection and systemic discrimination similar to the experiences of members of other minority groups.
Cultural Ableism and Historical Perceptions
Cultural Ableism:
Refers to the societal tendency to portray people with disabilities as "deviant."
Promotes negative beliefs and imagery that present people with disabilities as inherently inferior.
Historical Perceptions of People with Disabilities:
Subhuman Organism: The belief that people with disabilities do not possess the same level of intelligence, emotions, or human value as others.
Diseased Organism: Viewing a disability as a defect that requires a medical cure.
Object of Dread: Viewing the person as defective or as a form of punishment from God.
Object of Pity: Perceiving the individual as helpless, dependent, and fundamentally incapable.
Object of Ridicule: Subjecting individuals to name-calling (e.g., "retard") and humor centered on their disability (e.g., "moron jokes").
Holy Innocent/Eternal Child: The belief that a person with a disability can never become a capable or functioning adult.
Menace to Society: Perceiving individuals with disabilities as inherently violent; often portrayed as villains in media (e.g., Captain Hook).
Concepts of Disability Culture
Definition: Disability culture exists when people with a common disability share the following:
A historical knowledge base.
A common language.
A cultural identity characterized by specific norms for behavior.
A network of specialized social organizations.
Example: Deaf Culture is a primary example of this phenomenon.
Individual Ableism and Negative Assumptions
Individual Ableism:
Refers to the negative attitudes and behaviors directed at individuals based on the assumption that their disability makes their level of ability "deviant" from what is considered the "norm."
Reflection in Language: Negative words and phrases propagate negative attitudes, including:
Crippled
Handicapped
Impaired
Afflicted with…
A victim of…
Confined to a wheelchair
Negative Assumptions Commonly Made:
A disability is viewed strictly as a biological problem needing a "fix" rather than a societal problem.
Any problem a person with a disability encounters is assumed to be a direct consequence of their disability.
The assumption that "victims" of a disability can never lead productive lives.
The belief that being disabled is the most significant factor in how these individuals view themselves and compare themselves to others.
The assumption that every person with a disability will consistently require assistance.
Misuse of Labels and Current Educational Controversies
Misuse of Legitimate Labels:
Individuals diagnosed with severe or profound "mental retardation" (intellectual disability) were historically viewed as incapable of independent living and were subsequently institutionalized.
Experts previously assumed that up to of people with cerebral palsy were also mentally retarded; however, newer tools and testing strategies have refuted this claim.
Current Controversies in Labeling Children:
Children of color are over-represented in special needs populations.
White children are more likely to receive labels associated with less social stigma, such as ADHD.
Students with a disability are twice as likely to face suspension from school compared to their non-disabled peers.
Strategies for Changing Attitudes
Language Shifts:
Eliminating offensive words like "crippled" and "handicapped."
Implementing "PEOPLE FIRST" language, which emphasizes the person before the condition.
Examples:
People with epilepsy
People with cerebral palsy
People with disabilities
Institutional Ableism and the History of Institutionalization
Institutional Ableism:
Refers to established laws, customs, and practices that systematically discriminate against people with disabilities.
Historical Placement in Institutions:
In medieval Europe, children with disabilities were often placed in monasteries.
Communities confined "deviants" in available structures, such as leprosaria (leper colonies).
These buildings eventually evolved into mental asylums or "lunatic hospitals."
In the United States, this practice continued because individuals with physical, psychological, or developmental problems were not wanted within the general community.
Establishment in the U.S.:
Following the Civil War, communities turned to institutions to address societal problems.
People with disabilities were institutionalized in hospitals administered by individuals with medical degrees.
While these facilities were intended to "rehabilitate" clients, they often merely "took care" of (warehoused) them.
Evidence of Negative Attitudes:
The Eugenics Movement: This movement singled out people with mental or physical disabilities for institutionalization.
Many institutions were exposed for failing to provide for basic human needs.
states enacted laws that permitted the involuntary sterilization of those labeled as "feeble minded" or "mental defectives."
Deinstitutionalization and Community Living
State Responses:
Many states have passed "deinstitutionalization" laws to close large-scale institutions.
States now promote moving institutionalized individuals into community-based placements.
Alternatives to Institutions:
Most people with disabilities prefer living in communities.
Living options include family homes and group homes.
Note: Some communities still resist the establishment of group homes in residential areas.
Economic Costs and Government Support
Annual Cost of Care:
The minimal cost for institutional care is approximately each year.
Moving individuals from institutions to community settings has been shown to save between and .
The maximum cost for community placement is per person.
Taxpayers fund over of the expenses for people with disabilities living in institutions or nursing homes.
Government Legislation:
Social Security (1935): Initially did not include people with disabilities; coverage was expanded to them in the .
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, 1990): Passed by Congress to address discrimination, though it has been criticized as being ineffective in some areas.
Supplemental Security Income (SSI, 1973): Created to provide financial assistance to people with disabilities, but only if they could prove financial need.
ABLE Act (2014): Passed by Congress to increase the amount of allowable assets a recipient can hold while maintaining eligibility for benefits.
Barriers in Employment, Accessibility, and Health Care
Employment Statistics:
Two-thirds (\text{ approx.}$) of people with a disability want to work.
However, only of people with a disability are currently employed.
The majority of those who are employed work in "sheltered workshops."
Among those unemployed, report that employers were unwilling to provide the necessary accommodations for successful performance.
Mobility and Accessibility:
Individuals with disabilities are less likely to participate in community activities due to lack of accessibility.
Investigation found that of polling places had one or more physical impediments for a person with a disability.
Health Care:
Difficulty in obtaining private health insurance makes Medicaid an essential resource.
One-third (\text{ approx.}$) of people with disabilities choose not to work to avoid jeopardizing their Medicaid coverage.
Medicaid is the primary provider for over people under the age of who have disabilities.
Education and Legal Rights
Mainstreaming vs. Inclusion:
Federal legislation mandates Mainstreaming, meaning students must be taught in the "least restrictive environment."
Despite this, many students are still segregated.
Advocates prefer the Inclusion Model, which requires the full integration of students with disabilities into regular classrooms.
Legal Precedent: Honig v. Doe:
The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right to public education for all students with disabilities.
The court ruled that emotionally disturbed students cannot be suspended or expelled for behavior that stems from their disability.
Student placement cannot be changed without parental consent.
Educational Outcomes:
Only of students with a disability graduate on time, compared to of non-disabled students.