Ferriss-Hill_Varro's intuition of Cognate Relationship
Varro's Intuition of Cognate Relationships
Overview
Author: Jennifer L. Ferriss-Hill
Publication: Illinois Classical Studies, No. 39 (2014)
Focuses on Varro's understanding of cognate relationships in De Lingua Latina (DLL).
Argues that Varro perceived deeper relationships among languages beyond mere borrowing.
Key Arguments
Cognate Relationships
Varro demonstrates an understanding of language regularity.
Discusses relationships between Latin, Greek, and Sabellic dialects.
Contrary to traditional views, Varro showed awareness of genetic relationships among languages.
His observations are significant within the context of his time and intellectual environment.
Comparative Method
Analyzes Varro's concepts of analogia (regularity) and anomalia (anomaly).
Argues that Varro searched for structural parallels between Latin and Greek, indicating early comparative linguistics.
Highlighted how both languages exhibit similarities in grammatical structure.
Varro’s Methodology
Etymology and Language Change
Describes linguistic evolution by recognizing dialectal variations.
Observes systematic phonetic changes between urban and rural speech.
Acknowledges that not all origin of Latin vocabulary is from foreign words.
Use of Figurative Language
Utilizes metaphors (e.g., tree and roots) to articulate language relationships.
Illustrates the intertwining of language through kinship concepts, emphasizing a shared heritage.
Suggests language co-evolves rather than exists in isolation.
Evidence of Cognate Awareness
Formulaic Expressions in DLL
Varro employs specific formulas to denote words' origins, distinguishing between loanwords and cognates.
Uses terms like cognatio and societas highlighting genetic connections.
His categorization of the Latin lexicon into native, foreign, and obscure words reflects an intuition of complex relationships among languages.
Types of Formulaic Expressions
Varro categorizes foreign-derived words distinctively compared to cognate pairs.
Uses verbs indicating physical movements (e.g., uenit, sumpta) for loanwords, but extends etymologies for cognate pairs, showing depth of connection.
Employs relative pronouns and juxtaposition for cognates, emphasizing similarities.
Conclusion
Varro’s work in DLL reveals advanced thoughts on linguistic relationships in the context of ancient language studies.
His exploration indicates a step toward modern concepts of language families and cognate awareness.
Varro's insights suggest significant intellectual progress, positioning him as a precursor to comparative linguistics.