Speech Acts: Locutionary, Illocutionary & Perlocutionary

Overview of Speech Acts

  • A speech act = any utterance that fulfils a communicative function (e.g.
    apology, greeting, request, complaint, invitation, compliment, refusal).

  • May be:

    • A single word (e.g. “Sorry!”) or

    • Several sentences (“I’m sorry I forgot you were coming today…”).

  • Goes beyond grammar; hinges on culturally appropriate use of language.

  • Mastery (communicative competence) = knowing:

    • When to speak, what to speak about, with whom, where, and how.

  • Once competent, speakers can participate in broader speech events.

Communicative Competence & Culture

  • Correct form ≠ successful communication; pragmatic appropriateness is crucial.

  • Cultural differences can yield misunderstandings, e.g.

    • “How are you?” usually = “Hello,” not literal health inquiry.

    • Indirectness varies by culture; non-native speakers must learn English norms.

  • Example:

    • John: “I couldn’t agree with you more.”

    • Maria (L1 transfer): thinks John disagrees; shows pragmatic misinterpretation.

The Three Layers of a Speech Act

Speech Act=Locutionary,Illocutionary,Perlocutionary\text{Speech Act} = { \text{Locutionary}, \text{Illocutionary}, \text{Perlocutionary} }

1. Locutionary Act (Locution)

  • Basic act of producing a meaningful linguistic expression.

  • Contains a proposition formed by:

    • A referring noun/verb phrase + a predicate (Nordquist, 2015).

  • Content can be explicitly stated or implied.

  • Example: Saying “It’s hot in here.” (literal, factual statement).

2. Illocutionary Act (Illocutionary Force / Function)

  • The speaker’s intended social function while uttering.

  • Defined by social conventions; always intentional.

  • Listener must interpret correctly via contextual cues.

  • Same wording can carry different illocutionary forces:

    • “Where are you leaving?” → request for a ride or hint to depart.

    • “How are you?” → greeting, not health inquiry.

  • Illocutionary force = psychological attitude expressed (belief, desire, regret…).

3. Perlocutionary Act (Perlocutionary Effect)

  • Real-world consequence or mental state produced in the hearer ‫—‬
    persuading, angering, inciting, comforting, inspiring, etc.

  • Distinct yet intrinsically linked to the prior illocution (Gelber, 2002).

  • Examples:

    • Shouting “Fire!” induces evacuation → audience convinced of danger.

    • Judge declaring “Guilty” → accused believes incarceration is imminent.

Distinguishing Meanings (Austin, 1962 → Jaworowska, 2004)

  • Locutionary Meaning = literal propositional content.

  • Illocutionary Meaning = intended social function.

  • Perlocutionary Meaning = hearer’s actual response.

  • Composite illustration – “It’s hot in here”:

    • Locution: temperature statement.

    • Possible Illocutions:
      • Indirect request to open a window.
      • Indirect refusal to close a window.
      Complaint that window is shut.

    • Perlocution: someone opens window (or ignores complaint, etc.).

Success Conditions for Speech Acts

  • A speech act succeeds when audience correctly identifies the attitude
    the speaker intended.

  • Communication entails expressing an attitude:

    • Statement → belief

    • Complaint → displeasure

    • Request → desire

    • Apology → regret

Common English Speech-Act Formulas (U.S. usage)

  • Greeting: “Hi, Lizzie. How are things going?”

  • Compliment: “Hey, I really like your dress!”

  • Complaint: “We were told the refrigerator would be delivered in three days, but it’s been two weeks.”

  • Refusal: “I’d love to go to that concert, but Sunday just won’t work.”

  • Invitation: “Martha’s having friends over Saturday. Would you like to join?”

Pragmatic Difficulties for Non-Native Speakers

  • Lack of idiomatic knowledge or differing cultural conventions → pragmatic
    transfer from L1.

  • May interpret literal meaning and miss illocution (e.g., Maria’s confusion).

  • Importance of learning culturally bound expressions and indirect forms.

Speech Act Theory: Core Aims

(a) Explain how speakers use language to accomplish intended action.
(b) Explain how listeners infer those intentions from what is said.

  • Underlying assumption = Communicative Presumption:
    Whenever X addresses Y, X intends an illocutionary act.

  • Listeners therefore search for intended illocution beyond locution.

Summary Equation

Communication=Locution (what is said)+Illocution (what is meant)+Perlocution (what is achieved)\text{Communication} = \text{Locution (what is said)} + \text{Illocution (what is meant)} + \text{Perlocution (what is achieved)}