Chapter 2: Citizenship, Demographic Change, and Diversity

America's Competing Origin Stories

  • Idealized Account: Depicts the nation through European exploration (Leif Ericson in the 10th10^{\text{th}} century, Christopher Columbus in 14921492, and English settlements in Virginia and Massachusetts) and founding political milestones (Declaration of Independence in 17761776, Constitution in 17871787) rooted in liberalism and civic republicanism.

  • Settler Colonialism: Accounts for the nation's emergence through territorial conquest and the violent displacement of indigenous populations (such as the Powhatan and Wampanoag). Infectious European diseases and warfare reduced the indigenous population in North America from nearly 4,000,0004{,}000{,}000 in the late 15th15^{\text{th}} century to approximately 228,000228{,}000 by 18901890.

  • Chattel Slavery: Recognizes the abduction, commodification, and exploitation of African labor as foundational to the American economy. Slave-produced cotton became the pre-Civil War nation's primary export, generating capital that underpinned Northern industrialization and modern capitalism until emancipation via the Thirteenth (18651865), Fourteenth (18681868), and Fifteenth (18701870) Amendments.

  • Nation of Immigrants: Highlights successive influxes of global migrants seeking refuge and economic mobility, though consistently qualified by racial and nativist exclusions.

Historical Waves of Immigration and Exclusionary Laws

  • First Wave (Colonial Era to Early Republic): Dominated by English, Scottish, German, French, and Irish arrivals. The 17901790 Census recorded over 3,900,0003{,}900{,}000 people, including over 750,000750{,}000 Black people (over 690,000690{,}000 enslaved). The Naturalization Act of 17901790 restricted naturalization exclusively to "free white persons" of "good moral character" who completed 2 years2\,\text{years} of residence.

  • Second Wave (1830s1830\text{s}–1850s1850\text{s}): Included over 152,000152{,}000 arrivals between 18201820 and 18301830, 599,000599{,}000 between 18301830 and 18401840, and 1,700,0001{,}700{,}000 between 18401840 and 18501850, heavily driven by Irish famine refugees and German political migrants. It sparked anti-Catholic nativism led by the "Know Nothings" (American Party).

  • Third Wave (1880s1880\text{s}–1920s1920\text{s}): Brought over 20,000,00020{,}000{,}000 immigrants, primarily from Southern and Eastern Europe, peaking in 19071907 with 1,300,0001{,}300{,}000 arrivals at Ellis Island and reaching a foreign-born population peak of 14.7%14.7\% in 19201920.

  • Statutory Racial Restrictions:

    • Page Act of 18751875: Barred recruitment of Asian laborers and effectively blocked Chinese women under the pretext of preventing prostitution.

    • Chinese Exclusion Act of 18821882: Imposed a 10-year10\text{-year} moratorium on Chinese labor, barred Chinese immigrants from citizenship, and required internal identity certificates; extended by the Geary Act of 18921892 and made permanent in 19021902.

    • Immigration Act of 19241924 (Johnson-Reed Act): Imposed national quotas capped at 2%2\% of each group's 18901890 U.S. census baseline, established the "Asiatic Barred Zone," created the U.S. Border Patrol, and established the legal status of "illegal immigrant."


Immigration stocks and flows in the United States from 1850 to 2010

Legislative Reform and Post-1965 Demographic Transformation

  • Hart-Celler Act (19651965): Abolished national-origin quotas in favor of preferences for family reunification and occupational skills, unintentionally transforming national demographics.

  • Shift in Immigrant Origins: In 19601960, 84%84\% of the foreign-born population originated from Europe or Canada. By 20102010, this figure fell to 15%15\%, while Latin America (Mexico at 29%29\%, other Latin America at 24%24\%) and Asia (25%25\%) became dominant sources.


Shifts in the geography of immigration to the United States between 1960 and 2010
  • Majority-Minority Projections: The U.S. is projected to transition to a majority-minority population by 20452045 (49.7%49.7\% White, 25%25\% Latino, 13%13\% Black, 8%8\% Asian American, 4%4\% multiracial). The 20202020 Census confirmed that Americans aged 1818 and under are already majority-minority (47%47\% White).

  • Census Identifiers and Multiracial Growth: The 20202020 Census recorded a 127%127\% surge in the multiracial population (growing from 9,000,0009{,}000{,}000 in 20102010 to 33,800,00033{,}800{,}000 in 20202020) alongside the first absolute decline in the "White alone" count (falling 8.6%8.6\%).

  • Black Foreign-Born Expansion: Foreign-born shares of the U.S. Black population grew from 3.1%3.1\% (816,000816{,}000) in 19801980 to 8.7%8.7\% (3,793,0003{,}793{,}000) in 20102010.

Boundaries of Citizenship and Racial Prerequisite Cases

  • Dimensions of Citizenship: Earl Warren characterized citizenship as "the right to have rights" (Perez v. Brownell, 19581958), encompassing civil liberties, political rights (voting, running for office), and social/economic welfare protections (T. H. Marshall).

  • Constitutional and Statutory Status: Article 1 of the Constitution excluded "Indians not taxed" and counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person. The Naturalization Act of 18701870 added "aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent" to naturalization eligibility. Native Americans gained full birthright citizenship only through the Indian Citizenship Act of 19241924.

  • Racial Prerequisite Litigation (18781878–19441944): Across 5252 cases defining "Whiteness" for naturalization eligibility:

    • In re Ah Yup (18781878): Held that Chinese petitioners were neither White nor Black, denying naturalization.

    • Ozawa v. United States (19221922): Denied citizenship to Takao Ozawa by equating "White" strictly with Caucasian ancestry based on the scientific consensus of the period.

    • United States v. Thind (19231923): Denied citizenship to high-caste Indian petitioner Bhagat Singh Thind by abandoning scientific taxonomy in favor of the "common knowledge of the average man."

Mexican Immigration, Misperceptions, and Policy Debates

  • Historical Precedents: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (18481848) incorporated Northern Mexican territories and extended citizenship to resident Mexicans. The Bracero Program (19421942–19641964) issued 4,600,0004{,}600{,}000 agricultural contracts, creating long-term migratory channels and undocumented flows.

  • Empirical Realities vs. Common Misperceptions:

    • Legal Status: 77%77\% of the approximately 46,000,00046{,}000{,}000 foreign-born residents in the U.S. are legally documented (45%45\% naturalized citizens, 27%27\% lawful permanent residents, 5%5\% temporary residents); 23%23\% (10,500,00010{,}500{,}000) are undocumented.

    • National Origins: Mexican immigrants account for only 25%25\% (11,200,00011{,}200{,}000) of all U.S. foreign-born residents as of 20182018.

    • Undocumented Composition: From a 20072007 peak of 12,200,00012{,}200{,}000 undocumented immigrants (57%57\% Mexican), the population declined to 10,500,00010{,}500{,}000 by 20172017, with Mexican nationals representing 47%47\% (4,900,0004{,}900{,}000), Central Americans 18%18\% (1,900,0001{,}900{,}000), and Asians 14%14\% (1,500,0001{,}500{,}000).

  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): Executive policy initiated in 20122012 providing renewable two-year work authorization and deportation reprieves to more than 800,000800{,}000 undocumented youth, though offering no permanent pathway to legal citizenship.

Models of Immigrant Incorporation and Assimilation

  • Cultural Monotheism (Anglo-Conformity): Represented by the formula A+B+C=AA + B + C = A. Dictates that immigrant cultures must assimilate completely into the foundational Anglo-Protestant tradition, English language, and work ethic (Samuel Huntington).

  • Melting Pot: Represented by the formula A+B+C=DA + B + C = D. Posits that distinct immigrant traditions fuse into an entirely new cultural synthesis (Israel Zangwill).

  • Cultural Pluralism (Salad Bowl): Represented by the formula A+B+C=A+B+CA + B + C = A + B + C. Asserts that immigrant groups maintain distinct cultural identities while engaging cooperatively in civic society (Michael Walzer).

  • Straight-Line Assimilation: Envisions a steady fading of distinct minority ethnic traits across generations into mainstream Whiteness, designated as the "twilight of ethnicity" (Richard Alba).

  • Ethnic Disadvantage (Ethnic Resilience): Asserts that entrenched racial discrimination and structural barriers systematically prevent non-White immigrants from integrating or "passing" into Whiteness (Alejandro Portes and Robert Bach).

  • Segmented Assimilation: Posits divergent outcomes for immigrant cohorts based on human capital, socioeconomic class, racial discrimination, and specific local contexts of reception (Alejandro Portes and Min Zhou).