Federalist no.10 VS Brutus no.1
FEDERALIST 10
Main argument is concerning the “mischief of factions”
Factions: groups of people who believe their interests are more important than any other interests.
If the majority always prevailed, then the minority would never be represented.
If too many protections were provided for the minority, then the common good would never prevail.
The solution is to create a republican style government.
With so many factions, they would have to debate and compromise in order to get any laws passed.
Majority rules and minority rights are upheld.
BRUTUS 1
History had never seen a republican style government govern a population and land mass as large as the United States.
The necessary and proper clause and supremacy clause of the Constitution would create a powerful central government and render state government unnecessary.
Thus squashing the interests of the states.
If liberty was to be maintained, the Constitution with all its centralized power should not be ratified.
FEDERALIST 10
Main argument is concerning the “mischief of factions”
Factions: groups of people who believe their interests are more important than any other interests.
If the majority always prevailed, then the minority would never be represented.
If too many protections were provided for the minority, then the common good would never prevail.
The solution is to create a republican style government.
With so many factions, they would have to debate and compromise in order to get any laws passed.
Majority rules and minority rights are upheld.
BRUTUS 1
History had never seen a republican style government govern a population and land mass as large as the United States.
The necessary and proper clause and supremacy clause of the Constitution would create a powerful central government and render state government unnecessary.
Thus squashing the interests of the states.
If liberty was to be maintained, the Constitution with all its centralized power should not be ratified.