Malignant Breast Lesions
High-Level Content Map
Pre-malignant lesions
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Lobular Carcinoma in Situ (LCIS)
Invasive epithelial tumours (Carcinoma of the Breast)
Paget Disease of the nipple
Malignant stromal tumour – Phyllodes tumour
Types of Breast Carcinoma
Virtually all are adenocarcinomas that originate from the terminal duct–lobular unit (TDLU).
Historical “ductal” vs “lobular” labels now reflect tumour genetics/biology rather than cell of origin.
Broad groups (by ER / HER2 status):
Luminal = ER + / HER2 -
HER2-enriched = HER2 over-expressed, ER variable
Triple Negative = ER - / PR - / HER2 - (TNBC)
Premalignant Breast Lesions
Concept – Carcinoma in Situ
Malignant epithelial cells are confined by basement membrane → no metastatic access to lymphatics/blood.
Share many molecular events with invasive counterparts.
1. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Key Features
Clonal proliferation limited to ducts/lobules; myoepithelial layer preserved (often attenuated).
Can track widely through duct system → entire quadrant/sector involvement.
Detection: almost always on mammography –
Coarse/linear calcifications from necrotic debris or secretions.
Occasionally density or nipple discharge.
Architectural subtypes (usually mixed):
Comedo – pleomorphic high-grade nuclei + central necrosis.
Cribriform – round "cookie-cutter" spaces ± calcifications.
Micropapillary – complex bulbous protrusions, no fibrovascular core.
Papillary – true papillae with fibrovascular cores, absent myoepithelial layer.
Natural history:
Untreated low-grade DCIS → invasive cancer risk \approx 1\%\text{/year}.
High-grade/extensive lesions carry higher progression risk.
Breast-cancer death after DCIS diagnosis 1!–!3\% (often from later invasive foci).
Management
Mastectomy → cure >95\%.
Breast-conserving surgery ± radiotherapy acceptable but recurrence risk higher; of recurrences \approx 50\% are invasive.
Major recurrence predictors:
High nuclear grade/necrosis
Large extent
Positive surgical margin.
Post-op radiation and/or tamoxifen for high-risk cases.
2. Lobular Carcinoma in Situ (LCIS)
Key Features
Dyscohesive, uniform cells fill ducts/lobules; loss of E-cadherin (CDH1) → lack of adhesion & signet-ring forms.
Incidental finding – rarely causes calcification/density ⇒ detection unchanged by screening.
Bilateral in 20!–!40\% (vs 10!–!20\% for DCIS).
Immunophenotype: ER+ / PR+ / HER2-.
Clinical Course & Management
Serves as a risk marker for invasive carcinoma in EITHER breast (rate \approx 1\%\text{/year}).
Subsequent invasive cancers are 3× more likely lobular.
Options: close surveillance, tamoxifen, or prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in selected high-risk patients.
DCIS vs LCIS – rapid comparison
Both non-palpable; DCIS often micro-calcifies, LCIS rarely.
Both lead to invasive cancer in about one-third of cases.
LCIS has greater contralateral-breast risk (20!–!40\%).
Invasive (Infiltrating) Breast Carcinoma
Incidence & Epidemiology
Most common malignant tumour of women worldwide; lifetime risk \approx 1:8\;(12\%).
Mean diagnostic age 64\;\text{yrs}; rare <25\;\text{yrs}; incidence climbs after 30\;\text{yrs}.
Major Risk Factors
Female gender (99\% of cases).
Age – risk rises with advancing age.
Prolonged oestrogen exposure:
Early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity.
Post-menopausal obesity (↑ aromatisation → estrone).
Unopposed oestrogen HRT.
Family / Genetics:
First-degree relative → risk doubled.
Germ-line high-penetrance genes <10\% of cases: BRCA1/2, TP53 (Li-Fraumeni), PTEN, CDH1, RB1, ERBB2.
Environment – organochlorine pesticides, plastics (xeno-oestrogens).
Lifestyle – post-menopausal obesity, alcohol, smoking, inactivity.
Risk-Reducing Factors
Pregnancy <20\;\text{yrs} & prolonged breastfeeding.
Chemoprevention with ER antagonists (↓ ER+ cancers).
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (risk ↓ \approx 90\%).
Pathogenesis Highlights
Multistep accumulation of driver mutations within a permissive hormonal milieu.
Familial pathway: germ-line BRCA1 → TNBC phenotype; BRCA2 → ER+ cancers.
Sporadic pathway: oestrogen-driven proliferation + mutagenesis (↑ TGF-α, PDGF, FGF).
Three molecular tracks:
ER+ luminal (most common).
HER2 amplification.
ER/HER2 negative (TNBC, often p53-driven).
WHO / Histologic Classification (invasive)
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, NST 70!–!80\%.
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma \approx 10\%.
Special types – tubular/cribriform (\approx 6\%), mucinous (2\%), medullary (2\%), papillary (1\%), etc.
1. Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC)
Presents as hard, irregular, radiodense mass ≥ 2!–!3\;\text{cm} with desmoplastic reaction (gritty cut surface).
May tether skin or pectoralis → dimpling / fixation / nipple inversion.
Modified Bloom–Richardson (Nottingham) Grade (each scored 1!–!3):
Tubule formation
Nuclear pleomorphism
Mitotic count
Sum =3!–!5 → Grade 1; 6!–!7 → Grade 2; 8!–!9 → Grade 3.
2. Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC)
Biallelic CDH1 loss → dyscohesive single-file ("Indian file") cells; scant desmoplasia → mammographic occult.
Often bilateral & exhibits unusual metastases: peritoneum, leptomeninges, GI tract, uterus/ovary.
Germ-line CDH1 carriers also predisposed to diffuse gastric signet-ring carcinoma.
Special Invasive Subtypes
Medullary pattern (IBC-NST with medullary features)
Age 45!–!54; >50\% of BRCA1 tumours.
Syncytial sheets >75\%, dense T-lymphocyte infiltrate, pushing border, no tubules.
ER/PR negative; prognosis better than grade suggests.
Tubular carcinoma – small angulated tubules, myoepithelium absent, excellent outcome; multifocal/bilateral.
Papillary carcinoma – fibrovascular cores, older women, dx requires lack of myoepithelium.
Mucinous (colloid) carcinoma – gelatinous pools of mucin, median age 71, slow-growing.
Patterns of Spread
Direct – skin, underlying muscle.
Lymphatic – axillary most common; internal mammary for medial tumours.
Haematogenous – lungs, bone, liver, brain, adrenals.
Tumour topography: upper outer quadrant \approx 50\%; subareolar \approx 20\%.
Nipple / Cutaneous Manifestations
Retraction, distortion, bloody discharge, Paget eczema-like rash, skin dimpling, peau d’orange, ulceration/erythema.
Prognostic & Predictive Factors
Biology + stage drive outcome.
Fatal outlook when distant metastasis or inflammatory carcinoma present.
Major Prognostic Indicators
Axillary lymph-node status – single best factor if M0.
Sentinel node biopsy guides need for full dissection.
Distant metastasis – presence ⇒ cure unlikely; ER+ may achieve long remissions.
Tumour size – node-negative <1\;\text{cm} → >90\% 10-yr survival; >2\;\text{cm} → 77\%.
Local advancement – skin or muscle invasion.
Lymphovascular invasion – correlates with node mets & local recurrence.
Inflammatory subtype – 3-yr survival 3!–!10\%.
Molecular subtype & grade – triple-negative poorest, special histologic types (e.g., tubular) very favourable.
Gene-expression assays – help spare chemo in low-risk ER+ tumours.
Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemo – strong good-prognosis signal in TNBC/HER2 groups.
AJCC 8th Edition Staging (simplified)
Anatomic (T, N, M 0–IV) + Prognostic (adds Grade, ER, PR, HER2, multigene score).
Examples:
Stage 0 = DCIS; 10-yr survival 97\%.
Stage IV = any T/N with M1; 10-yr survival \approx 5\%.
Therapeutic Principles
Local control: breast-conserving surgery + radiation; mastectomy for large/multifocal or risk-reduction.
Systemic:
Endocrine therapy (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, oophorectomy) for ER+ tumours.
HER2 antagonists (trastuzumab/pertuzumab) for HER2+.
Chemotherapy for high-grade, highly proliferative cancers (esp. TNBC).
Failure of local control may progress to carcinoma en cuirasse (diffuse chest-wall infiltration).
Male Breast Cancer
Incidence \approx 1\% of female rate.
Risk factors: age, BRCA2 (≈6\% carriers develop), Klinefelter, oestrogen exposure, obesity, radiation.
Usually luminal type; TNBC & HER2 rare.
Presents as sub-areolar mass 2!–!3\;\text{cm} and/or nipple discharge; early skin/chest-wall invasion.
Axillary nodes positive in \approx 50\% at dx; metastasis pattern mirrors women.
Treatment: mastectomy + node dissection; systemic therapy per female guidelines.
Paget Disease of the Nipple
Unilateral, eczematous, pruritic, erythematous nipple/areola lesion.
Paget cells migrate from underlying DCIS along lactiferous ducts into epidermis (do not breach basement membrane).
Lesion oozes as barrier disrupted → crust.
Palpable mass in 50!–!60\% → almost always invasive carcinoma (ER-, HER2+).
No mass → usually pure DCIS. Prognosis → features of underlying carcinoma.
Stromal (Mesenchymal) Tumours
Phyllodes Tumour
Origin: intralobular stroma (like fibroadenoma) but presents 10!–!20 yrs later (peak 6th decade).
Gross: large, lobulated, leaf-like clefts.
Histology criteria vs fibroadenoma: ↑ cellularity, mitoses, pleomorphism, stromal overgrowth, infiltrative margins.
Behaviour:
Low-grade (most) – local recurrence possible; no metastasis.
Borderline / High-grade – local recurrence common; \approx 1/3 haematogenous mets (only stromal component).
Lymph-node spread rare → axillary dissection contraindicated.
Malignant Interlobular Stroma – Angiosarcoma
Rare; may be sporadic (young women, mean 35 yrs, poor prognosis) or post-radiation/chronic oedema (latency 5!–!10 yrs, incidence 0.3\%).
Other Breast Malignancies
Primary/secondary lymphomas (mostly B-cell; rare implant-associated T-cell).
Cutaneous sarcomas identical to skin counterparts.
Metastases to breast uncommon; melanoma & ovarian most frequent.
Key Take-Away Connections & Clinical Pearls
Screening mammography excels at finding calcific DCIS; lobular lesions often invisible ⇒ pathologist awareness crucial.
E-cadherin loss is both morphologic clue (dyscohesive cells) and a genetic hallmark of lobular pathogenesis; same mutation links to gastric signet-ring carcinoma (precision medicine implication).
Host immune response (T-cell infiltrate) modulates prognosis in medullary-pattern cancers, foreshadowing current immunotherapy paradigms.
Sentinel-node biopsy exemplifies personalized surgery – balancing staging accuracy with morbidity avoidance.
ER / HER2 status are simultaneously prognostic and predictive, guiding endocrine or targeted therapies.
Inflammatory carcinoma represents clinical–pathologic synergy: dermal lymphatic tumour emboli produce redness/warmth akin to mastitis but signify dismal outlook.
Paget disease teaches the importance of full breast imaging when facing “eczema” limited to nipple.
For phyllodes tumours, remember “leaf-like but seldom lethal” – excise with margins, spare the axilla.
Quick-Reference Numerical Nuggets
Lifetime female risk \approx 12\% (1 in 8).
DCIS/LCIS → invasive risk \approx 1\%\text{/year}; one-third ultimately invade.
Bilaterality: LCIS 20!–!40\% vs DCIS 10!–!20\%.
BRCA1/2 carriers: lifetime breast risk 40!–!85\%; ovarian risk (BRCA1 higher, BRCA2 10!–!20\%).
Inflammatory ca 3-yr survival \le 10\%.
Axillary node negative, tumour <1\;\text{cm} → >90\% 10-yr survival.
Mastectomy cures >95\% of isolated DCIS.