EXAM 2: PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING

Introduction to Classical Conditioning

  • Classical Conditioning
    • Definition: A learning process that involves associating two stimuli. One stimulus evokes a response typically elicited by the other stimulus.

Components of Classical Conditioning

  • Unconditioned Stimulus (US)

    • Definition: A stimulus that naturally and automatically elicits a reflexive or innate response without prior learning.
  • Unconditioned Response (UR)

    • Definition: The unlearned reflexive or innate response elicited by the US without prior learning.
  • Conditioned Stimulus (CS)

    • Definition: An originally neutral stimulus that, after being associated with the US, elicits a conditioned response (CR).
  • Conditioned Response (CR)

    • Definition: The learned response that occurs in reaction to the conditioned stimulus after conditioning has taken place.

Process of Classical Conditioning

  • The process begins with an innate unlearned response:
    • US: Food
    • UR: Salivation
  • A neutral stimulus (CS) is presented before the reflex is triggered, leading to a new learned response:
    • CS: Bell
    • CR: Salivation
  • This relationship illustrates how classical conditioning prepares an organism for future events (e.g., the bell signals food).

Varieties of Classical Conditioning

  • Protozoans: Do not demonstrate capability for classical conditioning.
  • Apetitive Conditioning: When the arrival of the US is a positive event (e.g., food).
  • Aversive Conditioning: When the arrival of the US is a negative event (e.g., shock).
  • Conditioned Emotional Response (CER): CR is an emotional response (e.g., fear/anxiety).
  • Classical Excitatory Conditioning: CS elicits a response (CR) similar to the UR.
  • Classical Inhibitory Conditioning: CS elicits a response (CR) different or opposite to the UR.

Aversive Conditioning Example

  • Stimulus: Puff of air to the eye (US) induces eyeblink (UR).
  • CS: Tone or light, which leads to gradual eye closure (CR).
  • This conditioning method is effective in both rabbits and humans but requires many trials.

Eyeblink Conditioning

  • Initial Response: The CS (tone) initially elicits no response.
  • Effectiveness Over Time: The effectiveness of the CS builds gradually with numerous pairings with the US.
  • Training Graphs:
    • Plots show the percentage of CS exposures that produce a CR (anticipatory eyeblink).
    • Initially, the CS exposure does not produce a CR, but over time, nearly every CS produces a CR.

Conditioned Emotional Responses

  • Example: "Little Albert" study (1929) exemplifies conditioned fear responses.
  • Before Conditioning: Albert sees a white rat without fear.
  • After Conditioning: Albert develops fear towards the rat and even similar stimuli (like Santa Claus).

Acquisition in Classical Conditioning

  • Definition: The process of establishing and strengthening the CR through repeated CS-US pairings.
  • Graphical Representation: Shows the drops of saliva elicited during acquisition and extinction phases, highlighting the strength of CR over trials.

Extinction in Classical Conditioning

  • Definition: The process in which the CS is presented without the US, leading to a weakening and eventual disappearance of the CR.
  • Notable Points:
    • Initial strong CR gradually diminishes with repeated CS presentations alone.
    • Extinction inhibits the CS-CR performance rather than erasing the CS-US connection.
    • Factors such as stress or changes in context can revive the CS-CR association following extinction.

Spontaneous Recovery

  • Definition: The reappearance of a previously extinguished CR after a rest period, typically weaker and extinguishing more rapidly upon return.

Generalization and Discrimination

  • Stimulus Generalization: Similar stimuli to the initial CS elicit a CR, aiding in survival.
  • Discrimination: The CR occurs to one stimulus but not another, allowing for differentiation between stimuli.

Contingency in Classical Conditioning

  • Positive Contingency: Presence of one stimulus predicts the occurrence of another.
  • Negative Contingency: Presence of one stimulus predicts the absence of another.

Variables Affecting CS-US Relationship

  • CS-US Order:
    • Forward Delay: CS precedes US.
    • Simultaneous: Both appear at the same time.
    • Backward: US comes before CS.
  • CS-US Interval: Optimal interval is typically 200 msec – 2 sec for conditioning effectiveness.
  • # CS-US Pairings: More pairings generally improve learning up to a maximum learning threshold.

Intensity and Familiarity of Stimuli

  • Intensity: The strength and salience of a stimulus can influence conditioning.
  • Familiarity/Previous Experience: Prior exposure to a CS can inhibit learning and lead to latent inhibition, where animals ignore known CS as it becomes irrelevant.

Associative Bias and Preparedness

  • Associative Bias: Indicates that some associations are easier to form than others based on biological relevance.
  • Studies by Garcia and Koelling (1966) demonstrate how animals are predisposed to associate tastes with sickness and sounds with pain based on evolutionary history.

Overshadowing and Blocking

  • Overshadowing: When a more salient stimulus in a compound CS overshadows the learning of a less salient stimulus.
  • Blocking: Occurs when a previously conditioned stimulus prevents the learning of a new stimulus when both are presented together. This suggests that previous knowledge interferes with new learning.

Applications of Classical Conditioning

  • Conditioned Fear Responses: Used in therapies for treating fear and anxiety.
  • Aversion Therapy: Pairs an unwanted behavior-triggering CS with a noxious US to condition an aversion (e.g., pairing a food with nausea).
  • Exposure Therapy: Techniques like systematic desensitization and flooding to extinguish conditioned responses by exposing patients to feared stimuli without US.

Conclusion on Classical Conditioning

  • Classical conditioning involves innate reflexes where a neutral stimulus is conditioned to elicit a response, helping organisms prepare and respond to their environment.

Important Theories and Models

  • Pavlov’s Contiguity Theory: Conditioning occurs due to the temporal association between the CS and US.
  • Rescorla-Wagner Modified Contiguity Theory:
    • Key points: Conditioning occurs based on the surprise of the US, and the extent of conditioning relates to the surprising correlation between CS and US.
    • Formula:
      ΔVa=αβ(λVax)\Delta V_a = \alpha \beta (\lambda - V_{ax})
    • Variables:
    • α\alpha: CS salience
    • β\beta: US intensity
    • λ\lambda: Total potential conditioning the US can support
    • VaxV_{ax}: Total conditioning in previous trials.