NY Times v United States
Prior Restraint— Government restricting publication of material before it is published.
The US does NOT have this
Per Curiam— Court order issued in the name of the Court rather than specific justices.
Opinion offered unanimously rather than one justice writing the opinion
There are still concurring and dissenting opinions with this
Pentagon Papers— Reports on the government’s involvement in Vietnam, including things that were being covered up by the government.
NY Times was prohibited from printing the story, but the Washington Post was allowed to by their respective courts
Because of the discrepancies, the case was taken to the Supreme Court
SCOTUS ruled in favor of allowing the newspapers to continue printing as the story was not helping an enemy or undermining the government, but informing the people
Prior Restraint— Government restricting publication of material before it is published.
The US does NOT have this
Per Curiam— Court order issued in the name of the Court rather than specific justices.
Opinion offered unanimously rather than one justice writing the opinion
There are still concurring and dissenting opinions with this
Pentagon Papers— Reports on the government’s involvement in Vietnam, including things that were being covered up by the government.
NY Times was prohibited from printing the story, but the Washington Post was allowed to by their respective courts
Because of the discrepancies, the case was taken to the Supreme Court
SCOTUS ruled in favor of allowing the newspapers to continue printing as the story was not helping an enemy or undermining the government, but informing the people