judicial decision I

Overview of Legal Architecture

  • Shift from general architecture of law to the application of legal rules.

  • Hardware vs. Software:

    • Hardware: Courts, Parliament, Executive, Legislature, Constitution.

    • Software: Legal rules, reasoning, application of rules in practice.

Legal Method

  • Focus on how judicial processes work, which rules guide reasoning and decisions.

  • Importance of legal rules in upholding the rule of law.

  • Preparation for case notes relies on understanding legal method and theory.

  • Importance of critique in understanding legal methods and advancing legal principles.

Encouragement for Assignments

  • Support and practice are crucial for success in assessments.

  • Automatic extension policy allows three extra days without loss of marks.

  • Recommended resources include:

    • Tracy Booth’s email for additional information on extensions and support.

Practical Study Tips

  • Don’t overthink the process; focus on practice to understand how to apply legal rules.

  • Suggested approach:

    • Start with easy guides to understand formatting and referencing.

    • Cross-reference findings with law journal articles for clarity on citations.

Jurisdiction

  • Jurisprudence defined as governance of governance (Mariana Valverde).

  • Original Jurisdiction vs. Appellate Jurisdiction:

    • Original: First hearing of a case.

    • Appellate: Review of cases from original jurisdiction.

  • Geographical jurisdiction may vary (e.g., federal vs. state).

Court Hierarchy in Australia

  • Lowest Courts: Magistrates’ Courts handle everyday offenses, resolutions for conflicts.

  • Intermediate Courts: District or County Courts deal with more serious offenses.

  • Highest Courts: Supreme Courts and Supreme Court of Appeal.

  • Federal Courts: Address national matters (e.g., immigration, constitutional conflicts).

    • Federal laws applied at a higher level than state laws.

Importance of Legal Precedents

  • Stare decisis: Decisions of higher courts bind lower courts ensuring consistency and predictability within the law.

  • Advantages:

    • Fairness and consistency in judicial decisions.

    • Reduces litigation due to predictability in outcomes.

    • Adaptability of law to contemporary circumstances.

Disadvantages of Precedents

  • Outdated precedents can become unjust over time, making it challenging to change.

  • Judges may distinguish current cases from past cases to avoid binding precedents.

  • Risk of inconsistencies in interpretation by different judges.

Ratio Decidendi vs. Obiter Dicta

  • Ratio Decidendi: The binding legal reason for a court's decision; governs future cases.

  • Obiter Dicta: Comments made in a judgment not essential to the decision, may be persuasive but do not carry binding weight.

Practical Considerations in Case Notes

  • Material facts should be concise and relevant to the legal issue.

  • The legal issue must be clearly identified along with the ratio.

  • Understanding the context of legal principles through case analysis is essential:

    • Use examples to illustrate the application of specific legal rules.

  • Focus on articulating the ratio clearly to reflect the overarching legal principles involved.

Case Example - McCarty v. Davis

  • Question of entitlement to the engagement ring upon breaking off the marriage:

    • Ratio:

      • If a party breaching a marriage agreement cannot demand the return of gifts given conditionally (i.e., the engagement ring).

  • Evaluating context (who broke off engagement) is critical in determining legal rights over conditional gifts.

robot